Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
11/7/2007 6:51:37 AM EDT
Just took possession of a TAC 52.  I'd read that it's not a bad idea to disassemble before shooting it and coat the edges of the baffles and the threads with anti-seize compound to aid in future disassembly/cleanings.

Now that it's apart I see that the baffle stack can be set with each baffle set in the same direction, or you can alternate the baffles and have each one 90 degrees out of phase with the previous baffle.  Which setup is more quiet?

11/7/2007 7:45:17 AM EDT
[#1]
I think 180 apart might be the best, BUT  try different orientations.

Like 90 all the way down ...   or a few 90 a few 180 .... etc.

11/7/2007 1:38:37 PM EDT
[#2]
I asked the folks at TI the same thing and they said each one 90* from the next.
(in a spiral formation) but there is no harm in experimenting!
11/7/2007 3:32:21 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
I asked the folks at TI the same thing and they said each one 90* from the next.
(in a spiral formation) but there is no harm in experimenting!


That's kind of what I was thinking.

Thanks!  
11/7/2007 4:39:00 PM EDT
[#4]
The instructions for my TAC65 says to spiral the baffles every 90 degrees as you  install them.
11/9/2007 8:09:11 AM EDT
[#5]
It won't make any difference how those baffles are oriented.  There is nothing in one baffle that will affect how the next one operates.

In fact if you look closely at the baffles they are missing the forward mouse-hole that is part of the original Finn design.  The Finn patent actually shows all the baffles aligned.  

The K baffle has been around for so long and done by so many people it still astounds me that major manufacturers get it wrong.  
11/9/2007 8:20:19 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
The K baffle has been around for so long and done by so many people it still astounds me that major manufacturers get it wrong.  


Which suggests the hole is unimportant since the suppressors still work rather well.

Armory Sponsor