Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Armory Sponsor
5/18/2002 6:04:31 PM EDT
Do please forgive my ignorance on this, since I live in Kalifornia and most of the guns this applies to are banned anyways.  Okay, the import ban says that only 10 parts (from a long list of particular parts) may be foreign made on particular firearms (those designated "non-sporting").  

Does this apply if the gun is not going to be in original configuration?  If not, then what's the point of all those thumbhole stocks I see for AK variants?  I would understand if it was related to the features-based ban, but I thought I heard someone mention it in regards to the import ban sometime back...
5/18/2002 6:39:59 PM EDT
[#1]
If you want to put a different style thumbhole stock onto one of these rifles it doesn't need to have the US made parts count to do so.
5/19/2002 1:12:25 PM EDT
[#2]
The "'89 Import Ban" really was just a change to the rules of the GCA68 for imported guns.  It changed the "sporting" definition to ban the import of semi-auto guns with "military features," such as:

- pistol grips
- bayonet lugs
- flash suppressors
- folding/collapsable stocks
- military bipods

For the purpose of THIS law, BATF ruled that thumbhole stocks were "sporting", so Uzis and AKs had thumbholes slapped on them and other offending features removed and were thusly imported.  These were guns that were still 100% imported parts, BTW.

Under Klinton, the importing of receivers, and later barrels, for "assault weapons" was banned by treaty or executive order.  Thus the "kit guns" began to show up, which, though largely made up of imported parts, had enough US-made parts to be considered "domestic."

Note: under the 94 Krime Bill, which covers both imports and domestics, BATF ruled that a thumbhole stock is still a pistol grip.  No more Uzis and MAK-90s.

-Troy
Armory Sponsor