Posted: 12/9/2009 8:09:08 PM EDT
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Nice and simple. I really like the thumb safety but have never understood the K-frame rear sight. It was used at a time when few custom rear sights were available. I would assume that being a low adjustable sight that it was a good choice for a carry gun. ...and I bet most everyone on the planet had used S&W revolver sights so these would be a natural progression...nice pistol... |
|
Jason's posts just remind me how thankful I am to have had a pistol done by Heirloom Precision - back when I could afford it. Very nice job, as always.
Speaking for a lot of people here, we always look forward to seeing these beautifully crafted and beautifully photographed firearms. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I understand why someone might like hard chrome, but I don't get the hard chromed front sight. Maybe it offers visual contrast, the black rear sight and the silver front. Anyways...I love it. You want visible contrast between the gaps and the rear sight. I find silver sights (like on a stainless revolver) hard to use as as, I would think a black rear and front silver sight would be a tough sight picture. Given the target, maybe not though. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I understand why someone might like hard chrome, but I don't get the hard chromed front sight. "was re-serrated and finished in cold blue as Swenson would have done." So it's not a silver front sight on the visible surface in the sight picture. Missed that. Now that's detail to craftsmanship. |
|
Quoted: Call me crazy, but *I* prefer the original (?) two-tone look, myself. I also prefer the arched MSH over the flat as well. Still a beautiful gun though, no question about that! ![]() It's just one of those things. Pure fact: the arched MSH wil ALWAYS look 100 percent sweeter than flat.... BUT Some guys shoot better with the flat and others with arched.....for some guys, it makes no difference. I was forced to admit that, since I shoot predominately one handed, the flat MSH is an absolute for me....I am forced to carry the "not quite so attractive" sister......but it's what works. Back to the work at hand. Jason, an excellent refit of a classic gun. Those old Swenson safeties were very cool for the time frame. How did you like the feel and oepration of that safety?? |
|
Thanks so much for the kind words gents. Quoted:
Quoted:
Nice and simple. I really like the thumb safety but have never understood the K-frame rear sight. It was used at a time when few custom rear sights were available. I would assume that being a low adjustable sight that it was a good choice for a carry gun. Correct, back in the day the K-frame rear sight was the sight to have. There really weren’t that many options and certainly not the wide range of choices we have today. For a 1970’s era gun this was state of the art. Quoted:
Quoted:
I understand why someone might like hard chrome, but I don't get the hard chromed front sight. "was re-serrated and finished in cold blue as Swenson would have done." So it's not a silver front sight on the visible surface in the sight picture. Correct as well, the face and top of the front sight are “black” in just the same manner as they were on many of the Swenson gun‘s I‘ve had. On this pistol the serrations were cut and front sight cold blued after the hard chrome was applied. Again, state of the art for a gun of this era. Quoted:
Those old Swenson safeties were very cool for the time frame. How did you like the feel and oepration of that safety?? The safety was actually a bit stiff, however I re-worked the part and remedied that. I’ve never been a big user of extended safeties and on my personal guns I prefer the standard size Colt part. However, this original hand-made Swenson part is actually very trim and relatively unobtrusive. I think Swenson had a good idea on the overall size, just long enough to make it more useable but not so big to be in the way. |
|
Kick ass and Accurately re- done. You raise the bar by exhibiting the ability to not only have your own style, but understanding and executing a past masters authenticaly.
I have been around long enough to have seen only one or two Pistolsmiths exhibit that ability. I would guess your about half of that current crowd Jason. Just my .02 cents worth Chuck W |
|
Jason, Thanks for the reply...I, too am a fan of the orginal style safety, I thought it was cool that the Swenson safety was stiff, I always set mine up pretty stiff and use a heavy ( but crisp ) trigger......though I think one of these days I have to drop a pound off my Hi Power....it's a bit much. Anyhow, as usual, bang up job on that resto!!! +5 for the Super Vel box!!!! |






