Posted: 12/10/2002 2:09:57 AM EDT
|
I cant decide which one would you chose and why? I am sticking with the 40 just cause I like it.. Thanks, Ropes |
| I carry a USPc in 40 and also have a 226. I've shot or held almost all of the other models. The trigger on the Sig is a world better than the one on the HK. Both are amazing handguns though. It's all personal preference. Either way, you can't go wrong. Best choice? One (or more) of each! |
|
I'd second the vote for a Sig, but it's based purely on ergonomics for me. I really wish the HK fit me better, as I'd carry it cocked & locked like a 1911 if it did. I just can't get to that safety very fast on the HK. Might be due to an injury to my right arm, I'm not sure. I can shoot a Sig better than almost anything else, except for that first shot. I guess I'm just too used to guns with a consistent trigger pull from start to finish. I used to practice with a Sig quite a bit and was getting better though, so I'm sure it would just be a matter of practice. |
|
buy both guns carry the sig strong handed, and the hk as a backup! nothing like surprising the crap out of a bad guy when you present with each hand full! hehehe just kidding, play with both and enjoy the one that feels good, and is easier for you to shoot. green |
|
We were talking about REAL guns, not toys, Hunter.... Just kiddin, Glocks are really nice, but I'd take a Mark 23 over anything, but it's just too damn big to carry. So I'd get the USP. I have a SS USP in 40, and love it. Just be sure to get a Hogue grip for it, those stock Polymers are hard on your hands! |