Posted: 1/17/2005 2:09:17 PM EDT
|
Has anyone used one of these before? Any information would be appreciated. Thanks! www.wilsoncombat.com/a_22_conversion.asp Edited to add link |
|
I have one, and it's decent. I have to load the magazine with the slide locked back, otherwise it won't seat it fully and it won't strip a round off of the top of the magazine. It's not really accurate. At 20 yards I can put five shots with my Kimber in the space of a quarter a lot of times. With the conversion kit, my groups run 2 to 3 inches, and this is at only 20 yards mind you. I give it a 6 out of 10 on my useful and neat to have scale. |
|
What about Kimber's .22LR conversion (www.sportsmansguide.com/cb/cb.asp?a=148189)? Anybody have any experience with this? Thanks! |
|
Yes. The Marvel IS that much better... forums.1911forum.com/showthread.php?t=100924 Rich |
| I believe that both the Kimber and Wilson kits are made by Ceiner with a few minor differences (sights, markings, etc.). From what I've heard (and I have no first hand experience with any of them) the Marvel and Jarvis conversions are more accurate, better target guns. The Ceiner/Kimber/Wilson kits are more for training and plinking (i.e less accurate). But still should be fun and cheap to shoot. |