Posted: 1/1/2007 10:52:49 PM EDT
| Which holster brand do you prefer and why. If you have experience with either one and can provide feedback. This will be for a full size 1911. I'm particuarly interested in the OWB belt holsters to compare. |
+1 i have tried: 3 bladetechs and 8 comptacs over the last few yrs... still got: 1 bladetech and 7 comptacs why? well for several reasons: 1st, the bladetech injected molded sucks, so dont compare it to anything comptac has--its simply cheapo, bulky kydex like uncle mike's 2nd: the techlock, while pretty good, doesnt ride well on the holster--WAY too high imo 3: wait time on bladetech is/was too dang long 4: i'm satisfied (and i'm sure you will be too) w/ comptac's product, functionality, and CS |
See? You would still be waiting for the Bladetech. |
| Comp Tac for carry and Blade Tech for matches. I like the tech loc for easy changes between stages, but Blade Tech doesn't make a decent IWB. I have carried the Comp Tac shirt tucker for a couple years and still haven't found anything better. I would like to try the newer offerings from them, they look a little more stable. I don't actually use the shirt tuck function. |
|
Out of the two you have listed Comp Tac wins hands down. Another great one not listed is Urban Legend Speed Slide by Tucker |
