Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/23/2009 9:00:59 AM EDT


I am interested in purchasing a P226 in 9mm sometime in the future. I am aware that early P226 frames had issues with cracking/fracturing. What I am wondering is if SIG has solved these issues, and if so when did they start producing the revised guns? I have heard that it was sometime in the mid 90's but I am unsure.



Thanks Guys,



Mike



3/23/2009 3:43:59 PM EDT
[#1]
The issue(s) have been resolved and it was actually '89-'90.  It was identified in ~'88-'89.  Hasn't been an issue for some time now.  Metalurgy, design and manufacturing processes have improved over the years.
4/5/2009 4:01:51 PM EDT
[#2]
is there a  serial number range I should be looking at to determine if my weapon is afflicted or at risk?
4/5/2009 6:59:33 PM EDT
[#3]
I've got a 226 .40sw in the U665XXX range. Its from 2006. Don't know if that helps. Its for sale in the EE btw. I want a 220!
4/6/2009 8:23:31 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
The issue(s) have been resolved and it was actually '89-'90.  It was identified in ~'88-'89.  Hasn't been an issue for some time now.  Metalurgy, design and manufacturing processes have improved over the years.



So I would venture to guess that a P-226 made in 1987 would be susceptible to the frame fractures as well?
4/9/2009 3:38:51 PM EDT
[#5]
Look at your frame rails and see if they have the "dust cutouts". If they are a solid rail like the newer ones you're fine.
4/9/2009 4:43:07 PM EDT
[#6]
Any pics or links to pics of the "dust cutouts"? I have a 1989 P226 s/n 168xxx and have been wondering if it is one of the susceptible ones.

I bought it used, but it has one of the tightest slide to frame tolerances I've ever seen on a production gun. No detectable play. That was one of the reasons I bought this particular pistol.



Quoted:
Look at your frame rails and see if they have the "dust cutouts". If they are a solid rail like the newer ones you're fine.


4/9/2009 9:17:51 PM EDT
[#7]
I have one that I think is a 91' KB. Also interested in what dust cutouts are.
4/10/2009 12:42:43 AM EDT
[#8]
They started with the new, improved frames at serial number 365,426. Even with the earlier guns there were only a very tiny percentage that ever cracked the rails.
4/10/2009 9:51:42 AM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
They started with the new, improved frames at serial number 365,426. Even with the earlier guns there were only a very tiny percentage that ever cracked the rails.


Interesting. According to a recent thread on SigForum, one of the armorers there has claimed that Sig updated the frames prior to serial number U141XXX. Who knows for sure?

4/10/2009 12:19:07 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Quoted:
They started with the new, improved frames at serial number 365,426. Even with the earlier guns there were only a very tiny percentage that ever cracked the rails.


Interesting. According to a recent thread on SigForum, one of the armorers there has claimed that Sig updated the frames prior to serial number U141XXX. Who knows for sure?



Mine is a U 565xxx so I guess I'm good. It's a KB (91').
4/11/2009 3:56:23 PM EDT
[#11]
From what I have read about it, it is more of a problem pretty much limited to the folded slide models.
Make sure you change your recoil spring every 5k-10k and make sure that the roll pins holding in the breach face don't become deformed from having a weakened recoil spring.

I think a search or two on sigforum.com should give you the info you need.