[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Strike-Hold

Posted: 6/23/2008 10:43:00 AM EDT

Is anybody else using the Strike-Hold CLP?

Posted: 6/23/2008 1:06:08 PM EDT

[#1]

I think it was determined to be not so good.....IIRC it is made of some nasty toxic stuff.

Posted: 6/23/2008 1:13:05 PM EDT

[#2]

Copy of Eezox which is a copy of G-96. A test on the web shows that it does not have the same rust protection as Eezox.

Posted: 6/23/2008 5:51:00 PM EDT

[#3]

Tempest - Can you reply with the link to the internet test? I always like to see these comparisons.

Thanks

Posted: 6/24/2008 1:12:44 PM EDT

[#4]

www.6mmbr.com/corrosiontest.html

Posted: 6/26/2008 6:57:41 AM EDT

[#5]

Tempest - Thanks the link.

Anybody know about how it works as a lube? I like the dry lube aspect for my farm equipment which pick up a lot of dust.

Posted: 6/26/2008 11:55:25 AM EDT

[#6]

I've been using strike hold on my Glocks for the past 6-7 years with adequate results. It leaves a nice, dry film, and on a Glock that's about all that's needed. I do still lube the stress points/rails with Weapon Shield. It's pretty good around the house as well, but for heavy duty jobs I use something like Eezox. (much more expensive though)

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Strike-Hold

AR Sponsor

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Strike-Hold

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Strike-Hold