Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
8/12/2009 11:26:18 AM EDT
Anyone have any experiences with this light?

8/12/2009 10:48:48 PM EDT
[#1]
It's a great light but old technology and it's heavy. Kind of like the M900. That to was a great light and great idea but then you go and lug that bitch around for a few hours and it's not so great anymore. Trust me I had both lights and now have a SF Scout. Better light, better tech, far less weight.
8/12/2009 11:21:07 PM EDT
[#2]
Thanks for your reply.

What makes it's technology old and what's considered new tech these days?

I always knew it was going to be heavy but I just thought 225 lumens for an hour was a good trade off for my need of outdoor illumination to about 75 or 100yards.
Just how heavy is the thing to make those 225 lumens not worth it?


My other concern would be that it is SO bright. If I use it indoors I'd just temporarily blind myself.
So I thought I should use a red filter for indoors but would'nt that wash out the red reticule of my eotech?
8/21/2009 1:12:53 PM EDT
[#3]
bump
8/21/2009 7:46:24 PM EDT
[#4]
My M600C scout light performed roughly 90% as well in my opinion as a 971 using the 225L bulb. I would DEFINITELY run a M600C over this behemoth. With the F04 diffuser, the M600C is an awesome indoor light.

M600C:

roughly 5oz, around 185 lumens, works VERY well at 75 yards, and out to 100 yards if you have an awesome optic like an ACOG that drinks up the light, works great indoors with F04 diffuser, producing a very nice, diffuse beam losing only 11% total output to the diffuser.

Oh, it has a run time almost 2 hours long and no bulb to shatter under recoil or droppage.

*Yes, I whore this light as often as I appropriately can.
8/21/2009 9:38:25 PM EDT
[#5]
I am definitely considering the M600C.
Sounds like a good light.
8/21/2009 11:16:12 PM EDT
[#6]
Not only is the M600C lighter, you're using 2 batteries (instead of 3) with a longer run time. Yes, the M600C may cost more but the less batteries you change, the more you're saving in the long run. That's one of the reasons I sold my M971 and went with the M600C
8/21/2009 11:25:14 PM EDT
[#7]
M600C can be built for around $180-220.
8/21/2009 11:27:49 PM EDT
[#8]
Anyone know the water submersion ratings of surefire lights?
8/22/2009 7:53:07 PM EDT
[#9]
bump
8/23/2009 1:48:47 AM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Anyone know the water submersion ratings of surefire lights?


For which light? The X300 is waterproof to 22 meters. You'll find that info in the description of the light.
8/23/2009 10:47:01 AM EDT
[#11]
For the Millennium series.
I can't find their submersion ratings anywhere.
8/23/2009 10:53:24 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
For the Millennium series.
I can't find their submersion ratings anywhere.


Call Surefire and ask.
8/23/2009 1:38:02 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
For the Millennium series.
I can't find their submersion ratings anywhere.


The only one I found was the M952V Millennium Universal WeaponLight whoch says waterproof for 1 meter for 30 minutes.
8/23/2009 2:39:41 PM EDT
[#14]
Although the Millennium Series are designed capable of being tested and rated waterproof to "Navy" specifications (33 metres), only those that have been individually tested receive the "N" for the model number and are "waterproof to 33 metres".
Otherwise SureFires are highly water resistant unless clearly specified

SureFire type-test and have gained confidence to rate several specific models to lesser depths for example the X300 to 22 metres.

There is also the general move to use IP67 which when given with a time frame indicates waterproof up to 1 metre for 30 minutes.
Should the manufacturer wish to rate to a greater depth then IP68 is used. Again with a time frame (usually greater than 30 minutes).

AR Sponsor