AR Sponsor
TRIJICON picture thread (Page 23 of 25)
|
LOVE THIS! |
"So I said to him, Look, buddy, your car was upside down when we got here. And as for your grandma, she shouldn't have mouthed off like that"
|
Originally Posted By MRW: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/5205/Scale_Adjusted_Actual_Image_seen_TA45_an-1382011.jpg fight me. The fight ended unfavorably for you before it even began. |
|
Originally Posted By Jonny1904: I don't like unneeded extra wide field of views which is why I prefer micro dots to full size. IDGAF about motion sensor on/off. And made in China, instant disqualifier. The fight ended unfavorably for you before it even began. Agreed, but the original post was disingenuous to begin with and best ignored. If you wanted a 1.5x ACOG with a wide FOV, the TA44 has a 39ft FOV, weighs half the Primary Arms prism, is made in the US and has an actually daylight bright reticle. Instead, one of the ACOGs with the narrowest FOVs was chosen as a comparison point. There are over 200 ACOG variants that allow the consumer to select their own tradeoffs (eye-relief, weight, brightness, reticle, color etc..). The Primary Arms lineup is shallow and optimized around being low cost. I intensely dislike the Primary Arms guerilla marketing strategy of posting stuff like this on other manufacturer threads and forums and argumentative comments on YT reviewers who don't like their products. |
Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out.
General education should not be mere job training, but training in how to be fully human.
https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/the-four-causes-of-classical-education/
General education should not be mere job training, but training in how to be fully human.
https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/the-four-causes-of-classical-education/
|
Originally Posted By MRW: You're factually wrong. I specifically said guerilla marketing: "These methods are often low- or no-cost and involve the widespread use of more personal interactions or through viral social media messaging." Sending free items to social media members who then go out and write promotional post like this on other manufacturer forums is guerilla marketing. |
|
Originally Posted By zcap: I specifically said guerilla marketing: "These methods are often low- or no-cost and involve the widespread use of more personal interactions or through viral social media messaging." Sending free items to social media members who then go out and write promotional post like this on other manufacturer forums is guerilla marketing. I'm in no way, shape, or form an agent of PA, marketing or otherwise. I owe them nothing. I am not being paid or otherwise compensated to promote them on arfcom. I have advocated for their product because I am personally impressed with the merits of the product, after being a vocal critic of previous products. To say that I am engaged in marketing for them is a false accusation. You are stating what you want to be true rather than what is. And by attacking the person rather than addressing the shortcomings that the ACOG has, that I pointed out with a photo, you make my point for me. The ACOG needs a serious update. The design has not changed in decades and they are being eclipsed by competitors. I still use a TA01 with an offset dot on my DM build. I'll dig out a photo of that one. |
Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out.
General education should not be mere job training, but training in how to be fully human.
https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/the-four-causes-of-classical-education/
General education should not be mere job training, but training in how to be fully human.
https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/the-four-causes-of-classical-education/
|
Originally Posted By MRW: PA sent me the GLx 2x for free with no obligation. I make no claims about how you feel about the product, or if you have any connection with Primary Arms, or as to the quality of the product in question. Do you know who footed the cost for your and others "free" PA prism? By your statement, it was PA, and it almost certainly came out of the PA marketing budget. The best guerilla marketing is done by unaffiliated parties who don't know they are doing it which is one of the reasons why it is so low cost. I am certainly not alone in becoming increasingly skeptical of PA due to forum and social media behavior of those pushing PA products, regardless of how genuine the posts are. |
|
Attached File Attached File |
Familiarity and prolonged exposure without incident leads to a loss of appreciation of risk.
|
Attached File Anybody with a ta02 on a block 1ish style rifle that can post some pictures? |
Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive.
"my arms are so fucking enormous , come to me please." -sksAL 8-29-15
"my arms are so fucking enormous , come to me please." -sksAL 8-29-15
|
Attached File TA11 on a LT mount |
Carry it, shoot it. (repeat forever)
Swing Your Sword
Swing Your Sword
|
Attached File TA33 |
Carry it, shoot it. (repeat forever)
Swing Your Sword
Swing Your Sword
|
Attached File |
Carry it, shoot it. (repeat forever)
Swing Your Sword
Swing Your Sword
|
1x24 Reflex. The original ACOG. Attached File Attached File |
"Preferred pronouns in social media bios are like bright, vibrant colors on snakes and frogs. Its nature's way of telling you to stay the fuck away". -Grottski, '22
|
@edwin907 every time I see one of your pics, I start listing out justifications to buy that ACOG. |
¡Ahora sin chingas!
|
Originally Posted By m24shooter: @edwin907 every time I see one of your pics, I start listing out justifications to buy that ACOG. It's not for sale. LOL It is, despite the current craze on LPVO, a very capable optic. It's only 5.5X. But what a 5.5X. I'd be willing to bet it will out resolve many of the LPVO at 6X. And color, contrast, definition would be superior too. If BAC works for you, and it's easier on the TA55 than you'd think, it is an actual option. And the eye box is fantastic. Better than fantastic. |
¡Ahora sin chingas!
|
Originally Posted By windyhill: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/8698/IMG-0420__1__jpg-2822688.JPG Is that rear BUIS zeroed to that position in front? How's the sight radius with the peep that far out? I had ideas to mount a DD fixed rear in front of it like the Canadians do with their Elcans, then figured the zero would never work and I'd need all the time a screwdriver handy. I thought about using the Larue LT103 instead and it was giving me OCD issues with it being so close to the front lens. I ended up putting an RMR on top and shrugged
|
|
Originally Posted By ArizonaRifleman: Is that rear BUIS zeroed to that position in front? How's the sight radius with the peep that far out? I had ideas to mount a DD fixed rear in front of it like the Canadians do with their Elcans, then figured the zero would never work and I'd need all the time a screwdriver handy. I thought about using the Larue LT103 instead and it was giving me OCD issues with it being so close to the front lens. I ended up putting an RMR on top and shrugged ![]() Originally Posted By ArizonaRifleman: Originally Posted By windyhill: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/8698/IMG-0420__1__jpg-2822688.JPG Is that rear BUIS zeroed to that position in front? How's the sight radius with the peep that far out? I had ideas to mount a DD fixed rear in front of it like the Canadians do with their Elcans, then figured the zero would never work and I'd need all the time a screwdriver handy. I thought about using the Larue LT103 instead and it was giving me OCD issues with it being so close to the front lens. I ended up putting an RMR on top and shrugged ![]() The 25 yard notch above the apertures works ok. Elevation is too far off for the apertures themselves to be useful. It’s not ideal, but I prefer the ta-31 back farther than a rear mounted buis will allow. |
Joined:
Oct 2022
Posts:
347
EE: 0% (0)
The Last Bastion of Freedom has already Fallen
Joined:
Jul 2023
Posts:
64
EE: 0% (0)
|
Originally Posted By TBone556: How do you like the ten mile? Ten miles have been great so far. Pretty light for what you get (3-18 ffp 24.4 oz) but a little long. The 7rm tikka had a 4-20 atacr (35 oz) on it and the weight savings is really nice. The Niightforce did have better glass, but not enough to outweigh the weight and rotating ocular (not terrible just annoying to have to rotate the flip cap when changing mag to prevent the bolt from hitting it), and sequential push button illum. sold the atacr on the EE here and was able to buy two ten miles (they were on sale for ~$1000 but back up to $1700 on OP). It’s just one set of data but they do some durability testing on scopes on the hunting forum rokslide, and trijicons have done as well in durability tests as nightforce which is nice to know in case I accidentally knock it over or something during deer season |
|
Original "ACOG" for M4a1. Attached File |
...Amongst the 1911 poors...
|
2022 MRO with the factory mount. Attached File RM04, 6moa on a LTT . Attached File |
...Amongst the 1911 poors...
|
RMRcc, 6moa, Springfield RO Elite. Direct mill from CHPWS. Attached File |
...Amongst the 1911 poors...
TRIJICON picture thread (Page 23 of 25)
AR Sponsor































