AR Sponsor
Posted: 8/10/2005 6:35:19 AM EDT
|
So I got my TA31F a couple days ago from ebay (Wolf Businesses, Inc ebay store) Got a good price and love the scope. But does anyone else feel as if the scope cannot be mounted far enough back to get the proper eye relief (mounted on flattop)? I can collapse my stock but then I feel to scrunched up for a comfortable shooting position. Anyone know any mounts that might sit the scope back a little bit more? Btw the glass/plastic tube that protects the fiber optics appears to have like little stress cracks all the way along the top, like it was bent too much. Hard to describe without a pic. But is that normal? There also seems to be a lot of glue residue around the glass inside the aluminum tube and on top where the fiber is mounted |
|
I ended up mounting mine back at the second from the last aft rail. It does need to be back a bit. When you shoot, you'll learn to keep the old eye back a bit from the scope as well as adopt a firm grip on the rifle as it will punch back with the distance that is required from eye to scope. Mine hasd the same "cracks" from mew in box. I don't think that they are from stress. Regards, flap |
|
I've seen four new in the box TA31Fs and all of them had some of the cracks and glue residue you speak of and I was disappointed with the quality of the assembly. The cracks may be unavoidable but the sloppy glue job seems to be just that -- sloppy work. Having said that -- the functionality of the optics is flawless and I bought one of the four and it has performed very well. |
|
i mount my ta13f forward exposing only one rail spot and shoot nose to charging handle. i feel that its plenty of eye relief though. the cracks are normal, all of mine have it and the glue residue is gel coming out of the tube which isnt as normal but it happens one of mine did it for awhile but has stopped. i will note that all of mine did not have any of these "problems" till way after i bought them |
hum... can you take a pic of it? most people describe goo leaking from their acogs.. but its mainly around the fiber optic area... the liquid is used to lift the fiber optic in the air a little ... to keep it in the center of the tube... as for eye relief, are you shooting nose to charging handle? all u.s. military as far as i know are taught to stick the tip of your nose to the charging handle... this helps with having a consistant cheek weld.... if you want to be able to just place your head on your stock... a ta11 has more of the eye relief that your looking for... but i would seriously train with nose to charging handle... after you train enough... you'll think its weird not to go to the charging handle... when i first picked up my m16 in the army it felt weird to do nose to charging handle... but mainly because of the stock being so flip'n long... the a1 length is much better ... or shorter yet... thats why i like magpul stocks and such... |
|
I referred to that cracking as "Spider-webbing" in a post a while back and got many replies from long time ACOG owners who claim it is normal, as long as it isnt oozing material Mine ..... ![]() Link to Spider-webbing thread - from archives not sure if all can access the archive link |
one of mine was oozing for a short while but stopped, do not notice any change in illumination or performance |
mine had a light layer on the surrounding area just to make it look wet but other than that it did not goo out.
|
|
I have a TA01NSN & it has same eye relief as the other TA models. 1.5" I believe is what is listed in specs. Works perfect mounted all the way to rear on last rail, but that leaves no room for a BUIS. If a BAC model would help, I'd sell this one & buy one asap. HS |
|
HogSniper, I don't think there is any eye relief difference, as I think they are the same scope except for the reticle and the addition of BAC. The BAC version puts you on a different plane of existence and is significantly easier and faster because of the reticle, but eye relief is the same. The upgrade is worth it to me. It’s money well spent. I have a LaRue mount and a Troy rear sight and have no issues. Maybe the LaRue mount allows the ACOG to sit further back so the mount can be place further forward. |
Well, you know I never thought of that. One has to remove the scope to use the buis anyway. I need to try one of the BAC models out first chance I get. If I like it, then I may take the plunge. I sure like the looks of the TA31F chevron reticle. thanks, HS |
Straight from Trijicon's website... TA11 (the 3.5x model) Specifications: Magnification: 3.5X Eye Relief: 2.4in Exit Pupil: 10mm Field of View: 5.5 degrees Length: 203mm (8.0 in) Weight: 397g (14 oz) Field of View: 9.63m at 100m (28.9 ft at 100 yds) Adjustment: 15 Seconds of Angle per click Reticle: 4 MOA Outside Diameter / Tritium Activity: 100 milliCuries in one source TAO1/nsn (the 4x model) Specifications: Magnification: 4X Eye Relief: 1.5 in Exit Pupil: 8 mm Field of View: 7.0 degrees Length: 5.8 in Weight: 9.9 oz Field of View: 36.8 ft at 100 yds Adjustment: 3 clicks per inch at 100 yds. Tritium Activity: 100 milliCuries in one source |
AR Sponsor
