Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
3/20/2012 10:34:13 AM EDT
Howdy Folks,

New member here, and I have a noob question I'm hoping someone can help me with.

I have searched the forums, and cannot find this info.

What are the differences in the 62gr ammo variations with the following designations:

XM855,  XM855F,  XM855LC,  XM855LC AC1,  XM855LC AC2, and the other 855 designations I have left out?

I know that one of them is lead core with a steel tip, and one is a steel core.  Which are which?

Thanks much for the help.
3/20/2012 10:50:49 AM EDT
[#1]
From Federal / American Eagle / Lake City?

I'm fairly sure the only difference is in the packaging, e.g. "box of 20", "box of 30 on stripper clips", "bulk 1,000 rounds in a bag", etc.  There may be QC differences, but ostensibly they're all the same round.
3/20/2012 12:12:38 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
From Federal / American Eagle / Lake City?

I'm fairly sure the only difference is in the packaging, e.g. "box of 20", "box of 30 on stripper clips", "bulk 1,000 rounds in a bag", etc.  There may be QC differences, but ostensibly they're all the same round.


^^^ Correct, just a difference in packaging.
3/20/2012 1:09:15 PM EDT
[#3]
OK thanks.

So is there a designation that differentiates the lead core w/steel tip round from the all-steel core round?

I am trying to avoid the all-steel core rounds.
3/20/2012 2:26:30 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
OK thanks.

So is there a designation that differentiates the lead core w/steel tip round from the all-steel core round?

I am trying to avoid the all-steel core rounds.


M855A1
3/20/2012 3:25:11 PM EDT
[#5]
I own lots of xm855. It is steal core. I cut one apart before to check.
3/20/2012 3:37:47 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
OK thanks.

So is there a designation that differentiates the lead core w/steel tip round from the all-steel core round?

I am trying to avoid the all-steel core rounds.


M855A1


I have seen a cross-section cut photo (I think from a link somewhere on this site) of the M855 that has a lead core, and a steel tip over the lead core.

Am I understanding correctly that there is also an M855 variant whose core is all steel?

Is this M855A1 the all-steel ?
3/20/2012 3:59:54 PM EDT
[#7]
All the m855 has a lead core with a steel penetrator.  The m855A1 is the new "green" lead free projectile.
3/20/2012 4:20:58 PM EDT
[#8]
M855A1 on right.

3/20/2012 5:46:13 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
OK thanks.

So is there a designation that differentiates the lead core w/steel tip round from the all-steel core round?

I am trying to avoid the all-steel core rounds.


M855A1


I have seen a cross-section cut photo (I think from a link somewhere on this site) of the M855 that has a lead core, and a steel tip over the lead core.

Am I understanding correctly that there is also an M855 variant whose core is all steel?

Is this M855A1 the all-steel ?


Yes, M855A1.  If you don't believe me, do an internet search of:    M855A1

3/20/2012 6:03:57 PM EDT
[#10]
Great, thanks guys, I appreciate the help.
3/20/2012 8:35:04 PM EDT
[#11]
BTW,
Welcome to the forum......
3/20/2012 8:55:01 PM EDT
[#12]
Thanks much Region

I've always been a pistol guy, The Job, competitions, etc, but a few years ago my dept put together a comprehensive carbine course, Ibought my first carbine, and came to realize a pistol is what you use so you can get to your rifle.

After a few years of shooting and carrying, I've learned a bit, but it is surprising how little some of our instructors know about specifics and details of the m4 carbine, especially on a dept our size.

I have learned quite a bit from this forum, although it has been as a "lurker"

Thanks to everyone for all the great info, I will continue to pass it on to my coworkers.
3/21/2012 8:25:25 AM EDT
[#13]
This is the second time I'm posting this this morning: I hope the people in charge of coming up with the stupid naming convention at Federal/ATK get a severe case of crotch-rot for the idiocy they're forcing us to deal with.
 
3/21/2012 8:29:19 AM EDT
[#14]
nvrmind
3/21/2012 10:21:52 AM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
This is the second time I'm posting this this morning: I hope the people in charge of coming up with the stupid naming convention at Federal/ATK get a severe case of crotch-rot for the idiocy they're forcing us to deal with.  




I here ya, Fed is just goofed up on the ammo naming.

3/21/2012 11:15:22 AM EDT
[#16]

Yep, I agree, confusing as all hells.

I've always bought the cheapest 55gr lake city for range training, and our dept. issues us Hornady TAP.

Only recently have i started looking at the M855 stuff, because I just don't trust TAP penetration through a barrier like vehicle glass.

Awfully confusing, with all of federal's numbers, letters, symbols and heiroglyphics.

And I'm still confused on the whole M855 tungsten core issue, etc etc.

Glad I found out from you guys that wikipedia is often wrong.

3/21/2012 12:26:13 PM EDT
[#17]
Quoted:

Yep, I agree, confusing as all hells.

I've always bought the cheapest 55gr lake city for range training, and our dept. issues us Hornady TAP.

Only recently have i started looking at the M855 stuff, because I just don't trust TAP penetration through a barrier like vehicle glass.

Awfully confusing, with all of federal's numbers, letters, symbols and heiroglyphics.

And I'm still confused on the whole M855 tungsten core issue, etc etc.

Glad I found out from you guys that wikipedia is often wrong.



The XM855... you buy from Federal, has a steel penetrator, lead core and a copper jacket.  The NEW US Army M855A1 has either a steel or tungsten penetrator tip and no lead(you probably will not see any of this on the commercial market for some time if at all) A couple of years ago, there was an experimental round that had all copper plus a tungsten powder/nylon penetrator inside, this is what I assume is at SG ammo listed as XM855LFB . Supposedly the tungsten powder got into the water table and it is toxic so it failed as an experimental round.
AR Sponsor