Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
9/29/2016 11:22:53 PM EDT
Cross Machine Tool - UHPR MOD 1 Handguard

*** Click on the link below for ordering info and pricing ***

Description:

Cross Machine Tool's Ultra High Precision Rails are engineered to Perform.

* Strength-  While not heavy, the UHPR series handguards shine in the strength department. Unlike competitor rails that are only marginally lighter, that feel spongy in the grip hand when squeezed or when side loads are applied to the forward rail, the UHPR stands firm.

* Accuracy- UHPR series products are machined to exacting tolerances,  by experienced toolmakers,  at our industry leading Multi-Axis CNC machining facility never outsourced to the lowest bidder.

* Function- The UHPR series products succeed in providing function that is demanded by professional users of todays Modern Sporting Rifles. No fluff or gimmicks,  just straight forward functional value in a great looking durable product.

* Value- As with any Cross Machine Tool product, value is engineered into the product.

* Design- UHPR series products are engineered to provide a durable, trouble free service life. UHPR series rails are compatible with Mil-Spec forged uppers & most billet uppers.

* Installation- UHPR series Rails are designed to also provide trouble free installation. Barrel nut does not require timing with gas tube, No shimming of barrel nut required.

* American Made- All Cross Machine Tool Products are manufactured Proudly in the U.S.A.


*** CLICK HERE to take me to the Rainier Arms website ***
















9/30/2016 9:11:37 AM EDT
[#1]
Looks nice. Do you have specs like weight, width/O.D. and I.D.?
9/30/2016 12:39:32 PM EDT
[#2]
Integrated qd points?
9/30/2016 2:11:54 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Quoted:
Integrated qd points?
View Quote


Was just thinking the same thing.
9/30/2016 3:17:44 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Quoted:
Integrated qd points?
View Quote

The holes at the front and rear of the 3 and 9 o'clock slots look like QD points.
9/30/2016 3:44:06 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Quoted:
Integrated qd points?
View Quote


Looks like it, plus they're anti rotation.

I would have liked to see MLOK on the diagonals too, but that might be too close to the URX 4
9/30/2016 4:47:15 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:

The holes at the front and rear of the 3 and 9 o'clock slots look like QD points.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Integrated qd points?

The holes at the front and rear of the 3 and 9 o'clock slots look like QD points.

Looks like it but that's why I wanted confirmation
10/2/2016 8:30:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:
Integrated qd points?
View Quote


Yes, front and rear QD points on the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions.
10/2/2016 8:31:36 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
Looks nice. Do you have specs like weight, width/O.D. and I.D.?
View Quote


Will have to pull some from stock and let you know.  
10/2/2016 8:58:05 PM EDT
[#9]
Is the 6.7"rail actually 6.7", or is that anot approximation.  Looking at this for my 9mm build....I like it and hope it will work.
10/8/2016 10:48:11 PM EDT
[#10]
I see you mention billet uppers, have you test specifically with a mega upper?
10/9/2016 8:47:49 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
Is the 6.7"rail actually 6.7", or is that anot approximation.  Looking at this for my 9mm build....I like it and hope it will work.
View Quote


6.7" is pretty exact.  
10/9/2016 8:48:27 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Quoted:
I see you mention billet uppers, have you test specifically with a mega upper?
View Quote


I haven't tested it on a Mega yet.  Obviously the CMT uppers work just fine.  
10/9/2016 1:14:50 PM EDT
[#13]
I'm really liking the looks of this rail. I think my Spikes upper might need one!
10/26/2016 12:14:50 PM EDT
[#14]
Does anyone have any photo's  the handgaurd installed to a upper receiver?
10/28/2016 9:47:32 AM EDT
[#15]
I like it for a LW build. Do you think CMT will offer a mod with full picatinny on top?
10/28/2016 11:53:24 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Quoted:
Does anyone have any photo's  the handgaurd installed to a upper receiver?
View Quote


10/28/2016 11:55:34 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Quoted:
I like it for a LW build. Do you think CMT will offer a mod with full picatinny on top?
View Quote


I don't know.  Perhaps if demand is high enough, but the idea is to save weight.  
11/19/2016 6:57:40 PM EDT
[#18]
I bought one of these and I think they need some improvements:

- It doesn't fit standard upper receivers without filing the anti rotation tabs
- The small amount of picatinny was out of spec (too wide)
- It would be helpful to have a tiny relief cut at the bottom rear of the tube to allow fitment with a wider range of lower receivers
11/21/2016 8:31:40 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Quoted:
I bought one of these and I think they need some improvements:

- It doesn't fit standard upper receivers without filing the anti rotation tabs
- The small amount of picatinny was out of spec (too wide)

- It would be helpful to have a tiny relief cut at the bottom rear of the tube to allow fitment with a wider range of lower receivers
View Quote




Wonder if you got a bad one; mine doesn't have any of those issues.
11/22/2016 7:25:50 AM EDT
[#20]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I bought one of these and I think they need some improvements:

- It doesn't fit standard upper receivers without filing the anti rotation tabs
- The small amount of picatinny was out of spec (too wide)

- It would be helpful to have a tiny relief cut at the bottom rear of the tube to allow fitment with a wider range of lower receivers
View Quote


http://i.imgur.com/RdH1lGUl.jpg

Wonder if you got a bad one; mine doesn't have any of those issues.
View Quote



what do you know.....
11/22/2016 11:25:03 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Quoted:


http://i.imgur.com/RdH1lGUl.jpg

Wonder if you got a bad one; mine doesn't have any of those issues.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I bought one of these and I think they need some improvements:

- It doesn't fit standard upper receivers without filing the anti rotation tabs
- The small amount of picatinny was out of spec (too wide)

- It would be helpful to have a tiny relief cut at the bottom rear of the tube to allow fitment with a wider range of lower receivers


http://i.imgur.com/RdH1lGUl.jpg

Wonder if you got a bad one; mine doesn't have any of those issues.


Well, I tried contacting them to find out and never could get a response.  It would not fit four different upper receivers, and the picatinny most certainly measures too wide (which I checked after finding that a couple different accessories didn't fit).
11/22/2016 11:30:52 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote History
Quoted:



what do you know.....
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I bought one of these and I think they need some improvements:

- It doesn't fit standard upper receivers without filing the anti rotation tabs
- The small amount of picatinny was out of spec (too wide)

- It would be helpful to have a tiny relief cut at the bottom rear of the tube to allow fitment with a wider range of lower receivers


http://i.imgur.com/RdH1lGUl.jpg

Wonder if you got a bad one; mine doesn't have any of those issues.



what do you know.....


*click*  
AR Sponsor