[ARCHIVED THREAD] - OA93

Posted: 2/8/2006 1:03:39 PM EDT

Opnion on the OA93? Is the fact that the buffer tube.gas tube is above the carrier-put any more stress on the unit? Is the Bushmaster a better design..

Posted: 2/8/2006 1:28:58 PM EDT

[#1]

I have no idea which design is better, but the OA93 sure looks better.

Posted: 2/10/2006 12:00:54 PM EDT

[#2]

I like mine....

More Stress?? Maybe....Non-issue with the warranty...

Which Bushmaster are you talking about??

Posted: 2/10/2006 12:10:35 PM EDT

[#3]

i think it looks jacked up

Posted: 2/12/2006 5:58:58 AM EDT

[#4]

I love my '93. It's probably more accurate than I am, has a good look without the buffer and generally looks extremely evil sitting atop a Beta-C 100 rd drum. hat
My own .02 worth.

-HK-

Posted: 2/12/2006 3:29:12 PM EDT

[#5]

This is mine I rebarreled to 7mmBR. Only problem I have had was with the charge handle block breaking,it is made of aluminum. It floats on the op rod and gets cocked sometimes,breaking the thin bottom part of it out.I made one out of 1/2in.steel bar stock,haven't had a problem since.
This pic is before I put the Leupold scope on it.
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e376/Dieseldr/7mmBRRside.jpg

Posted: 2/14/2006 2:40:18 PM EDT

[#6]

I have to say that there is something genuinely obscene about that adaptation of an OA93 - and I like it!-HK-

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - OA93

AR Sponsor

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - OA93

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - OA93