AR Sponsor
Posted: 9/26/2014 4:26:50 PM EDT
| Has anyone ever used these? Curious if they are good to go for a budget build? |
|
Quoted:
The lower should be fine. Matrix makes lowers for Ruger. I have a Factory Ruger 556 and a Matrix lower on my PSA Upper; no problems with either and the fit is very good. Quoted:
Quoted:
Has anyone ever used these? Curious if they are good to go for a budget build? The lower should be fine. Matrix makes lowers for Ruger. I have a Factory Ruger 556 and a Matrix lower on my PSA Upper; no problems with either and the fit is very good. Thanks. Is the Matrix lower identical to the one on your Ruger (aside from rollmark)? |
|
Quoted:
Thanks. Is the Matrix lower identical to the one on your Ruger (aside from rollmark)? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has anyone ever used these? Curious if they are good to go for a budget build? The lower should be fine. Matrix makes lowers for Ruger. I have a Factory Ruger 556 and a Matrix lower on my PSA Upper; no problems with either and the fit is very good. Thanks. Is the Matrix lower identical to the one on your Ruger (aside from rollmark)? Looks to be the same to me. |
| I just received a Matrix Aerospace upper and lower set. I haven't put a barrel on the upper but have outfitted the lower with a PSA pistol parts kit and everything fit fine. The machining looks top quality with no marks that I have seen on other vendors' receivers. |
|
It seems that almost all references to Matrix manufacturing receivers for Ruger trace back to an outfit that goes by "runnerrunner".
Not saying it isn't true but after all of the allegations that CMT manufactures all of Colt's receivers (which isn't true) I wondered why Ruger would farm out receivers when they manufactured them for years for DPMS, EA, and others makes you wonder. |
AR Sponsor