AR Sponsor
Posted: 10/28/2002 3:59:10 PM EDT
| Does it really make the rifle more accurate using vortex? |
|
Well, this gun has the new Vortex installed, and it is a darn accurate gun considering the way its set up, but i cant say for sure if the Vortex has anything to do with it? www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=142144 |
|
Any accuracy gain of the Vortex is more than offset by the gigantic dust cloud it kicks up from the seated, kneeling, or prone position. At one of the first ASSweb vegas shoots one shooter had a Vortex equipped AR. Shortly after each shot and dust cloud about 4 feet around would rise up from the groud and then spread out like the ripples in a pond. It's really impressive to see. But no fun to be standing in the middle of it. |
|
I'm not too sure about the accuracy you gain from the Vortex. But I much rather have the Phantom on my battle rifle, that's just me though. With the Phantom your muzzle wont get hung up on brush, and if you are in a rough MOUT situation and your AR is getting banged up the tips if the phantom have more support to keep from getting bent. YMMV & Just my .02! |
|
Both phantom and Vertex have the ability not to interfere with accuracy unlike the bird cage hider, to improve accuracy is first claimed by the manufacture, and later confirmed by PK of SAR in one of his awesome article. I use both the phantom and also the vertex, my phantom equipped SPR rifle I have got 1/4MOA with TAP at 100yards. I had the rifle with out hider at first, I got a good 1/2 MOA consistently at 100, then I had my smith tap and thread on the Phantom, the group remain at 1/2 MOA consistently, but I occasionally have a group down to 1/4MOA. again, this doesn't mean anything, because I could be getting better as a shooter(what a joke :)), but I think the Phantom definitely do not diminish the accuracy on a rifle. and that plus the ability to subside the flash is the biggest advantage you cna have on a fighting rifle. As far as the dust cloud, the hider have to be set correctly, the prone openings has to be in the 2, 4, 8 and 10 o'clock position so as it will not kick up a storm such as the guy in Vegas. |
Wow, I did not know thats why my Vortex was mounted with the prongs in that position. Kurt asked me how I wanted the prongs positioned when he mounted it. I didnt know and told him to just do it however he thought best. Im glad he knew, Kurt's the best! |
| When the Vortex first came out I replaced the regular GI flash hiders on three ARs. I did not notice any change in accuracy, but the scope zero did change slightly on all three. This zero shift was repeatable in removing the Vortex and replacing the GI flash hider. Of no significance, but interesting. Watch-Six |
|
Re the Vortex The Vortex was designed to be a flash hider and in the capacity, I have never seen anything that compares. The fact that it kicks up dust etc from different positions has nothing to do with the design purpose however I am sure it could be rather annoying. I first the first Vortex designs on a variety of weapons(uzi, mac, full auto etc) with the designer, and I am here to tell you that for the intended purpose....I don't know of a design that is it's equal. read NO LIGHT AT THE MUZZLE when fired at a obtuse angle in your direction, in full darkness. Later called Nil-Flash as I recall but if it is the true Vortex.....it's a hell of a flash hider. The issues of dust etc. may or may not be a over riding issue depending on the value you place on it's primary intended purpose. Paul Prochko |
AR Sponsor