AR Sponsor
AR15 High Quality Photos Pic Thread!! (Page 2 of 114)
|
Originally Posted By Munition:
For a long time now I've wanted to access a thread dedicated to high quality images. In other words, I would like to think maybe a better way for deciding if an image belongs here is weather or not the user took his/her time with the picture to make sure the lighting was right and the image was clear. I would expect photo's from Quib, stick, b3, Clasky, Mark, and others to appear here maybe. If not, all is well, I'll have fun looking at whats out there! To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. You guys are more than welcome to browse through my Flickr gallery and if you see something you feel meets the definition, to post it in the thread, but I would rather not say that anything of mine is overly special. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stickgunner/ |
Stick
[email protected]
www.rainierarms.com
(253) 218-2999 Office
(253) 218-2998 FAX
www.weaponevolution.com
www.stickgunner.com
[email protected]
www.rainierarms.com
(253) 218-2999 Office
(253) 218-2998 FAX
www.weaponevolution.com
www.stickgunner.com
|
Originally Posted By Stickman:
Originally Posted By Munition:
For a long time now I've wanted to access a thread dedicated to high quality images. In other words, I would like to think maybe a better way for deciding if an image belongs here is weather or not the user took his/her time with the picture to make sure the lighting was right and the image was clear. I would expect photo's from Quib, stick, b3, Clasky, Mark, and others to appear here maybe. If not, all is well, I'll have fun looking at whats out there! To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. You guys are more than welcome to browse through my Flickr gallery and if you see something you feel meets the definition, to post it in the thread, but I would rather not say that anything of mine is overly special. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stickgunner/ High Quality Pics and humble too... If you won't say it, I will. Stickman produces some of the "Highest Quality" pics I've ever seen. |
|
Originally Posted By Stickman:
Originally Posted By Munition:
For a long time now I've wanted to access a thread dedicated to high quality images. In other words, I would like to think maybe a better way for deciding if an image belongs here is weather or not the user took his/her time with the picture to make sure the lighting was right and the image was clear. I would expect photo's from Quib, stick, b3, Clasky, Mark, and others to appear here maybe. If not, all is well, I'll have fun looking at whats out there! To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. You guys are more than welcome to browse through my Flickr gallery and if you see something you feel meets the definition, to post it in the thread, but I would rather not say that anything of mine is overly special. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stickgunner/ What a modest man! All your work is high-quality, and it's always something to look forward to when it pops up on my news feed on Facebook. Keep up the good work. |
|
Originally Posted By BillyJack:
Originally Posted By Stickman:
Originally Posted By Munition:
For a long time now I've wanted to access a thread dedicated to high quality images. In other words, I would like to think maybe a better way for deciding if an image belongs here is weather or not the user took his/her time with the picture to make sure the lighting was right and the image was clear. I would expect photo's from Quib, stick, b3, Clasky, Mark, and others to appear here maybe. If not, all is well, I'll have fun looking at whats out there! To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. You guys are more than welcome to browse through my Flickr gallery and if you see something you feel meets the definition, to post it in the thread, but I would rather not say that anything of mine is overly special. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stickgunner/ High Quality Pics and humble too... If you won't say it, I will. Stickman produces some of the "Highest Quality" pics I've ever seen. Thankyou sir, I am flattered by your words. |
Stick
[email protected]
www.rainierarms.com
(253) 218-2999 Office
(253) 218-2998 FAX
www.weaponevolution.com
www.stickgunner.com
[email protected]
www.rainierarms.com
(253) 218-2999 Office
(253) 218-2998 FAX
www.weaponevolution.com
www.stickgunner.com
| Stick I don't think pictures of ARs get any more high quality. Maybe there is an argument that can be made that your images can be matched with other photographers, but I have yet to see what you can't do with AR pictures. Love my facebook feed of your stuff by the way |
|
Originally Posted By LeonC:
Originally Posted By Stickman:
Originally Posted By Munition:
For a long time now I've wanted to access a thread dedicated to high quality images. In other words, I would like to think maybe a better way for deciding if an image belongs here is weather or not the user took his/her time with the picture to make sure the lighting was right and the image was clear. I would expect photo's from Quib, stick, b3, Clasky, Mark, and others to appear here maybe. If not, all is well, I'll have fun looking at whats out there! To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. You guys are more than welcome to browse through my Flickr gallery and if you see something you feel meets the definition, to post it in the thread, but I would rather not say that anything of mine is overly special. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stickgunner/ What a modest man! All your work is high-quality, and it's always something to look forward to when it pops up on my news feed on Facebook. Keep up the good work. LOL, my recent picture of the Wolverine up on Mt Rainier wasn't very high quality, but thank you. I try to update the Facebook pics 5 or 6 times a week. |
Stick
[email protected]
www.rainierarms.com
(253) 218-2999 Office
(253) 218-2998 FAX
www.weaponevolution.com
www.stickgunner.com
[email protected]
www.rainierarms.com
(253) 218-2999 Office
(253) 218-2998 FAX
www.weaponevolution.com
www.stickgunner.com
|
To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. For me, getting (back) into shooting is a somewhat recent hobby, but photography is something I've been into most of my life. Feel free to critique my website (pjmatthewsimages.com) as you wish. In my opinion, you are both a creative and highly talented photographer. Great photography is many things, but arguably mostly based on the control and use of lighting. Few others (there are a couple) who have posted photos here have used lighting in the way you do. I haven't had a lot of practice shooting my rifles, but you would certainly be the one photog I would emulate when I decide to compose, light, and shoot some for myself! |
|
Originally Posted By Stickman:
To be honest, I think it would be hard for me to post a picture saying that my images are "high quality". I've got a lot of work which is published in catalogs and magazines, but I think it is still highly subjective as to what is a high quality image, and what is not. You guys are more than welcome to browse through my Flickr gallery and if you see something you feel meets the definition, to post it in the thread, but I would rather not say that anything of mine is overly special. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stickgunner/ Got any tips for beginners trying to take pictures of their firearms? Without a doubt you take some of the best gun pictures any of us has ever scene. |
|
Originally Posted By DitchDr:
I think this one turned out nice. 6.8 SBR http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh159/ditchdr-photos/DSC02459.jpg Atom Ant....awesome!! lol |
|
Originally Posted By Captain_Howdy:
Natural lighting, natural environment, quality is subjective upon the viewer, I just added it because it is untouched and unenhanced but still looked good...to me anyway. Let me know if it doesn't fit and I will certainly pull it. http://i1119.photobucket.com/albums/k632/Captain_Howdy1/grass.jpg Edit: photobucket pisses me off....it looks way better on my pc 
if you don't pay them for the premium membership they lower the quality to like 25% 
|
WARNING MY GRAMMAR SUCK MY SPELLING SUCK
Justin Beeber didn't father her baby...System Message did. He climbin' in your windows, snatchin' your people up...
Justin Beeber didn't father her baby...System Message did. He climbin' in your windows, snatchin' your people up...
|
Originally Posted By Captain_Howdy:
Natural lighting, natural environment, quality is subjective upon the viewer, I just added it because it is untouched and unenhanced but still looked good...to me anyway. Let me know if it doesn't fit and I will certainly pull it. http://i1119.photobucket.com/albums/k632/Captain_Howdy1/grass.jpg Edit: photobucket pisses me off....it looks way better on my pc
The angle and composition are just boring, try to use natures natural contours the rifles straight forms to create composition and depth. |
|
Originally Posted By whoreable:
Originally Posted By Captain_Howdy:
Natural lighting, natural environment, quality is subjective upon the viewer, I just added it because it is untouched and unenhanced but still looked good...to me anyway. Let me know if it doesn't fit and I will certainly pull it. http://i1119.photobucket.com/albums/k632/Captain_Howdy1/grass.jpg Edit: photobucket pisses me off....it looks way better on my pc
The angle and composition are just boring, try to use natures natural contours the rifles straight forms to create composition and depth. ok thanks...I will pull it now. deleted pic....until next time 
|
Photoshopped by my wife!!
By jukeboxx13 at 2012-04-15 |
|
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Photoshopped by my wife!! http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/7710/ddm4v7.jpg By jukeboxx13 at 2012-04-15 You get yourself an optic recently? |
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
|
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Photoshopped by my wife!! http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/7710/ddm4v7.jpg By jukeboxx13 at 2012-04-15 You get yourself an optic recently? No this is an old pic i found with my brother in laws eotech. I have no rails a handstop, and troy sights on my current config. |
|
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
Originally Posted By jukeboxx13:
Photoshopped by my wife!! http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/7710/ddm4v7.jpg By jukeboxx13 at 2012-04-15 You get yourself an optic recently? No this is an old pic i found with my brother in laws eotech. I have no rails a handstop, and troy sights on my current config. Well maybe you'll eventually one up your brother in law and go with an Aimpoint. 
|
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
|
Originally Posted By Smithy:
Heres a few from a while back http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v305/ryan1105/CSC_0169.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v305/ryan1105/CSC_0171.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v305/ryan1105/knife2-2.jpg I'm glad people want to keep this thread alive! Its all great guys. Looking good! By the way, what tomahawk is that? I love it! |
You're only making it worse for yourself!
Joined:
Jul 2008
Posts:
5485
EE: 100% (212)
TN, USA
|
Just finished my SBR today. Tax Stamp arrived a week ago. She is ready to rock and roll! I am so excited! I am glad to be part of the NFA family now! The craziest thing is that I absolutely hated the wait, but once I got that tax stamp in my hand I wanted more almost immediately... Suppressor next! This is my very first tax stamp so I have been fondling it for the last week....my wife keeps rolling her eyes when she sees me around the house with it (including the john..lol) but I just keep smiling. Here is what I have on the build so far:
Upper: VLTOR MUR-1 w/ assist and deflector Lower: Complete VLTOR VR lower with oversize magazine release Stock: VLTOR Mod Stock (Dark Earth) Pistol Grip: Tango Down Large Battle Grip (Dark Earth) Trigger Guard: Magpul Enhanced Trigger Guard (Dark Earth) Magazines: Magpul P-Mags of course...(Dark Earth) Buffer Tube: VLTOR 5 Position (Numbered in white) Buffer/Spring: Spikes Tactical Heavy Buffer Charging Handle: Bravo Co Gunfighter Large Latch BCG: Spike's Tactical Nickel Boron Bolt Carrier Group Hand Guard: VLTOR CASV-MT Carbine Free Float Hand Guard (Dark Earth) Barrel: Ballistic Advantage LLC.'s 7.5" Stainless Steel and Chrome Lined Muzzle Brake: Juggernaut Tactical Righthand Tactical CQB Brake Gas Block: Sadlak Industried .750 Low Profile Clamp on Gas Block Gas Tube: Spike's Tactical Pistol Length Forward Grip: Surefire Light/Vertical Grip Combo with I.R. Lens Cover (yes that is a hint at whats going on her next week) Selector: Battle Arms B.A.D.A.S.S. ambi selector Optic: EOTech XPS2-0 "CQB" Brownells Edition Reticle w/ QD mount Irons: Dueck Defense Rapid Transition Sights (Could not get a full co-witness with flip up sights, so had to go with the RTS sight) Rail Covers: Magpul XTM Covers (Dark Earth) and Magpul XT Covers (Black) Sling: Magpul MS3 Sling Mounts: One VLTOR QD Mount and One Magpul Rail Mount Attachment So here it is as it sits today. The only change that I may make is the muzzle brake. I have a Noveske KX3 in the mail to be delivered by UPS on Monday. I guess I will try both and see which one I like or my rifle likes and stick with that. I am leaning towards the Juggernaut brake as it really looks nasty on there! Here she is: 
|
|
Originally Posted By SAPPNASTY:
Just finished my SBR today. Tax Stamp arrived a week ago. She is ready to rock and roll! I am so excited! I am glad to be part of the NFA family now! The craziest thing is that I absolutely hated the wait, but once I got that tax stamp in my hand I wanted more almost immediately... Suppressor next! This is my very first tax stamp so I have been fondling it for the last week....my wife keeps rolling her eyes when she sees me around the house with it (including the john..lol) but I just keep smiling. Here is what I have on the build so far: Upper: VLTOR MUR-1 w/ assist and deflector Lower: Complete VLTOR VR lower with oversize magazine release Stock: VLTOR Mod Stock (Dark Earth) Pistol Grip: Tango Down Large Battle Grip (Dark Earth) Trigger Guard: Magpul Enhanced Trigger Guard (Dark Earth) Magazines: Magpul P-Mags of course...(Dark Earth) Buffer Tube: VLTOR 5 Position (Numbered in white) Buffer/Spring: Spikes Tactical Heavy Buffer Charging Handle: Bravo Co Gunfighter Large Latch BCG: Spike's Tactical Nickel Boron Bolt Carrier Group Hand Guard: VLTOR CASV-MT Carbine Free Float Hand Guard (Dark Earth) Barrel: Ballistic Advantage LLC.'s 7.5" Stainless Steel and Chrome Lined Muzzle Brake: Juggernaut Tactical Righthand Tactical CQB Brake Gas Block: Sadlak Industried .750 Low Profile Clamp on Gas Block Gas Tube: Spike's Tactical Pistol Length Forward Grip: Surefire Light/Vertical Grip Combo with I.R. Lens Cover (yes that is a hint at whats going on her next week) Selector: Battle Arms B.A.D.A.S.S. ambi selector Optic: EOTech XPS2-0 "CQB" Brownells Edition Reticle w/ QD mount Irons: Dueck Defense Rapid Transition Sights (Could not get a full co-witness with flip up sights, so had to go with the RTS sight) Rail Covers: Magpul XTM Covers (Dark Earth) and Magpul XT Covers (Black) Sling: Magpul MS3 Sling Mounts: One VLTOR QD Mount and One Magpul Rail Mount Attachment So here it is as it sits today. The only change that I may make is the muzzle brake. I have a Noveske KX3 in the mail to be delivered by UPS on Monday. I guess I will try both and see which one I like or my rifle likes and stick with that. I am leaning towards the Juggernaut brake as it really looks nasty on there! Here she is: http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3423.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3421.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3420.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3415.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3414.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3409.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3407.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3406.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3403-1.jpg http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f189/GLOCKSOLJ/DSC_3405.jpg what mag release is that i want. also i love my exps dont they just rock.
|
AR15 High Quality Photos Pic Thread!! (Page 2 of 114)
AR Sponsor