Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
4/23/2007 7:23:31 AM EDT
I have the choice to get either a Bushmaster AR-15 M4 a3 without the LE markings on it or one with LE markings on it for $100 more. Which would you choose and why?
4/23/2007 7:25:43 AM EDT
[#1]
I'd choose the cheaper one.  A "LEO ONLY" marking isn't worth 100 bucks to me.  If they're configured the same, choose the cheaper.
4/23/2007 7:26:34 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
I'd choose the cheaper one.  A "LEO ONLY" marking isn't worth 100 bucks to me.  If they're configured the same, choose the cheaper.


+1
4/23/2007 7:28:36 AM EDT
[#3]
Why would you want that crap on the side of your receiver anyways? and then to pay more for it also.
4/23/2007 7:29:53 AM EDT
[#4]
Do you think even with a possible BAN coming, the LE might become more valuable to collectors then the standard configuration?

I don't want to make this thread into a huge discussion about a BAN, its just a simple question.

Thanks
4/23/2007 7:29:54 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I'd choose the cheaper one.  A "LEO ONLY" marking isn't worth 100 bucks to me.  If they're configured the same, choose the cheaper.


+1


+2

hard to justify $100 for 7 letters.

4/23/2007 7:31:44 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
Do you think even with a possible BAN coming, the LE might become more valuable to collectors then the standard configuration?

I don't want to make this thread into a huge discussion about a BAN, its just a simple question.

Thanks




IMO, don't buy a current production AR15 for investment purposes.

4/23/2007 7:40:27 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Do you think even with a possible BAN coming, the LE might become more valuable to collectors then the standard configuration?

I don't want to make this thread into a huge discussion about a BAN, its just a simple question.

Thanks




IMO, don't buy a current production AR15 for investment purposes.



Yea my purchase isnt stickly for an investment, but If getting the LE marked version may become a little more valuable then the standard, I would like to get that one. Thats why im asking before I make the purchase.. Here are the tweo im looking at

LE marked:  

Item # RCWA3F-16M4-DCH

Mfg Bushmaster

Model E2S A3 M4 SOPMOD "DSC Exclusive"

Action: Semi-Automatic
Stock: 6-Position Telescoping Buttstock,Blk Pistol Grp
Receiver: Forward Assist Brass Deflector, LE/Govt Marked
Capacity: 30+1
# of Mags: 1
Safety: Manual Safety
Sights: A3 Sights
Barrel Length: 16" Chrome-Lined M4 Profile BBL
Overall Length: 32.5"
Weight: 6.7 lbs
Muzzlebreak: Birdcage Flash Suppressor
Add'l Features 1: A3 Removeable Carry Handle, 3 Long Rail Covers
Add'l Features 2: 4-Rail Free Floating Hand Guard, Bayonet Lug
Packaging: Black Hard Case

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Or...

Item # BCWA3F-16M4

Mfg Bushmaster

Model E2S A3 M4 Type Carbine

Action: Semi-Automatic
Stock: 6-Position Telescoping Buttstock
Receiver: Forward Assist Brass Deflector
Capacity: 30+1
# of Mags: 1
Safety: Manual Safety
Sights: Open Sights
Barrel Length: 16" Chrome-Lined M4 Profile BBL
Overall Length: 32.5"
Weight: 6.7 lbs
Muzzlebreak: Flash Suppressor
Add'l Features 1: A3 Removeable Carry Handle, Bayonet Lug,
Add'l Features 2: 1" Black Sling, Black Thermaplastic Pistol Grip
Packaging: Black Hard Case
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The first one is $1000 + tax (on sale) MSRP 1295.00
the second is $840+ tax (not on sale) MSRP 1230.00
4/23/2007 7:43:00 AM EDT
[#8]
Not worth it... go without the markings.

Besides, your rifle will look better
4/23/2007 7:44:50 AM EDT
[#9]
Is there supposed to be some difference in the quality of the parts used in the LE marked rifles?

It wouldnt be like a remington 870 police model comaparred to a Remington 870 express?
4/23/2007 7:49:23 AM EDT
[#10]
It sounds like you're waiting for someone to tell you to buy the LE. If that's what you want, go for it. It's not worth 100 words to me much less 100 dollars.
4/23/2007 7:51:38 AM EDT
[#11]
If you are trying to buy this rifle for investment purpose , buy a stripped lower
also with LEO markings.

I don't think any of that will make any price difference in case of a ban.

Every thing out there will be pre ban up until the date of the ban.
4/23/2007 7:52:38 AM EDT
[#12]
lol no no no. I just want to make the right choice. Im going to order one up today. I am now leaning towards the non LE marked...

I dont know much about AR's Can someone go through the specs above and tell me which is worth it for the price? I dont think they are configured the same..

This is my last question,  
4/23/2007 7:53:10 AM EDT
[#13]
Also I think a AR lower looks much nicer without that on there
4/23/2007 8:00:52 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
lol no no no. I just want to make the right choice. Im going to order one up today. I am now leaning towards the non LE marked...

I dont know much about AR's Can someone go through the specs above and tell me which is worth it for the price? I dont think they are configured the same..

This is my last question,  


The difference is the floated rail , if your going to want to mount a light or grip get the rail
4/23/2007 8:04:03 AM EDT
[#15]
Yes I do want a rail. But is it worth the extra money? or can I get the second choice for $840 and add a rail my self for cheaper?
4/23/2007 8:06:22 AM EDT
[#16]
Surefire rail $150-160
4/23/2007 8:08:13 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
Yes I do want a rail. But is it worth the extra money? or can I get the second choice for $840 and add a rail my self for cheaper?


$160 is not a bad price for a rail . already installed .
4/23/2007 8:08:57 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
Yes I do want a rail. But is it worth the extra money? or can I get the second choice for $840 and add a rail my self for cheaper?

The rail would cost more than $100...go that route.
4/23/2007 8:11:07 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
Surefire rail $150-160


So the LE model is probably is worth it right?

Ok, you guys are also saying the LE markings are ugly. Can someone show me a side by side picture or the difference?


Wouldnt it make sense to get the LE model for $1000 with he rail rather then spending $840 and adding a rail later on for $150? I mean you wouldnt disregard the LE just because it has LE on it right? Are the LE markings that bad?
4/23/2007 8:13:07 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
Is there supposed to be some difference in the quality of the parts used in the LE marked rifles?

It wouldnt be like a remington 870 police model comaparred to a Remington 870 express?


The LEO gun will be lighter



If I had the choice at the same price I would take the LEO gun , just for fun. For $100 more I'll take the cheaper rifle.
4/23/2007 8:14:13 AM EDT
[#21]
Got a direct link to the rifles in question?  

It seems that they're NOT configured exactly the same (FF rail, etc).
4/23/2007 8:18:08 AM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:
Got a direct link to the rifles in question?  

It seems that they're NOT configured exactly the same (FF rail, etc).


www.galleryofguns.com

Go to gun locator, then type in the specs "bushmaster ar-15, .223"  etc .etc.

The two models in question are

RCWA3F-16M4-DCH

and

BCWA3F-16M4

I cut and pasted the specs of both rifles above, did you see?
4/23/2007 8:21:41 AM EDT
[#23]
Nobody likes the LE markings? I would think they were kinda neat just to have..? no?
4/23/2007 8:24:16 AM EDT
[#24]
For the price considering the specs and markings and price which would you buy?


LE marked:

Item # RCWA3F-16M4-DCH

Mfg Bushmaster

Model E2S A3 M4 SOPMOD "DSC Exclusive"

Action: Semi-Automatic
Stock: 6-Position Telescoping Buttstock,Blk Pistol Grp
Receiver: Forward Assist Brass Deflector, LE/Govt Marked
Capacity: 30+1
# of Mags: 1
Safety: Manual Safety
Sights: A3 Sights
Barrel Length: 16" Chrome-Lined M4 Profile BBL
Overall Length: 32.5"
Weight: 6.7 lbs
Muzzlebreak: Birdcage Flash Suppressor
Add'l Features 1: A3 Removeable Carry Handle, 3 Long Rail Covers
Add'l Features 2: 4-Rail Free Floating Hand Guard, Bayonet Lug
Packaging: Black Hard Case

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Or...

Item # BCWA3F-16M4

Mfg Bushmaster

Model E2S A3 M4 Type Carbine

Action: Semi-Automatic
Stock: 6-Position Telescoping Buttstock
Receiver: Forward Assist Brass Deflector
Capacity: 30+1
# of Mags: 1
Safety: Manual Safety
Sights: Open Sights
Barrel Length: 16" Chrome-Lined M4 Profile BBL
Overall Length: 32.5"
Weight: 6.7 lbs
Muzzlebreak: Flash Suppressor
Add'l Features 1: A3 Removeable Carry Handle, Bayonet Lug,
Add'l Features 2: 1" Black Sling, Black Thermaplastic Pistol Grip
Packaging: Black Hard Case
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The first one is $1000 + tax (on sale) MSRP 1295.00
the second is $840+ tax (not on sale) MSRP 1230.00
4/23/2007 8:26:35 AM EDT
[#25]
For $160 more I would be paying for LE markings and a rail. Should I go for it?

4/23/2007 8:28:59 AM EDT
[#26]
height=8
Do you think even with a possible BAN coming, the LE might become more valuable to collectors then the standard configuration?


What kind of asshole wants to invest in something that represents a grossly unconstitutional law, in the unlikely event that they can turn a profit if our country ever passed another such law infringing upon a basic right? I guarantee if you buy it, you'll find yourself secretly hoping for another ban, just like all those assholes on gunbroker.
4/23/2007 8:31:32 AM EDT
[#27]
If that is what you want, then by all means go buy it.
4/23/2007 8:36:02 AM EDT
[#28]
My personal opinion: I don't like the markings. I prefer a "clean" looking receiver, but more than that I don't want to have my "Gov't/LEO/Military Only" marked AR15 questioned or confiscated by a LEO that doesn't understand the law. The same reason I personally don't use a selector switch that will move to the F/A position on a semi-only FAL rifle. Not worth the possible headache to me.
4/23/2007 8:39:43 AM EDT
[#29]
Are you a LEO ? ,  because if your not  , the rifle will not function correctly .
4/23/2007 8:42:23 AM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:

Do you think even with a possible BAN coming, the LE might become more valuable to collectors then the standard configuration?


What kind of asshole wants to invest in something that represents a grossly unconstitutional law, in the unlikely event that they can turn a profit if our country ever passed another such law infringing upon a basic right? I guarantee if you buy it, you'll find yourself secretly hoping for another ban, just like all those assholes on gunbroker.


Quote" Yea my purchase isnt stickly for an investment"


If im in the market for a AR for personal use and am researching what would be all around best bet for my money , what is wrong wioth that? Im not hoping for anything. Sorry if you took it the wrong way.

I hear what your saying but I am not in anyway supporting any BAN. Lets just stop at that. Please. Dont get mad at me for what might happen. I have as much control over any BAN as the next guy and trust me I am not for it..
4/23/2007 8:47:17 AM EDT
[#31]
It just sounds like you would no sooner have a problem with a nazi symbol, or "Hilary 2008" engraved on the side of your receiver... the "For Law Enforcement Use Only" is a sick representation of what this country has been slowly turning into : a police state. Do you really want a reminder of what kind of screwed up legislation we had for 10 years?  

I wouldn't risk it either - if you ever have to USE that thing, the DA will run up and down your ass for having "For LE Use Only" on the side, trying to make it look like you thought you were a commando or something.

There are plenty of rare firearms to invest in. Having 'For LE Only' is rare, in much the same way that having an AR used in a mass shooting is rare. It's not something you want your hands to be on.
4/23/2007 9:13:54 AM EDT
[#32]
You are paying for the rail, not the markings. As long as it doesn't say, "I like small boys" and functions properly, I could give a crap what's on the receiver.
4/23/2007 10:52:46 AM EDT
[#33]
height=8
As long as it doesn't say, "I like small boys"


So you're ok with, "I hate our constitution" ?
4/23/2007 1:41:28 PM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:
Are you a LEO ? ,  because if your not  , the rifle will not function correctly .


Why do you say that?
4/23/2007 2:32:41 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Are you a LEO ? ,  because if your not  , the rifle will not function correctly .


Why do you say that?


He is fucking with you, dasanii

If there are 2 side by side exactly alike in every way except the markings, I would take the blank one.

The marked one's are a holdover practice from the national AWB. Makers have continued it for a variety of reasons.

Just whip out the change to get a plain jane A3 and you will be glad you did.
4/23/2007 2:50:46 PM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:

Do you think even with a possible BAN coming, the LE might become more valuable to collectors then the standard configuration?


What kind of asshole wants to invest in something that represents a grossly unconstitutional law, in the unlikely event that they can turn a profit if our country ever passed another such law infringing upon a basic right? I guarantee if you buy it, you'll find yourself secretly hoping for another ban, just like all those assholes on gunbroker.


This is the kind of thing that deters people from posting on this forum.  If someone wants an LE marked lower for perceived CDI factor, so be it.  Just like some people have to have a pony or a snake on their rifle.    

That said, although I don't associate with any of those "a**holes" on Gunbroker or any other auction, the only reason people get away with charging extra for anything is because some people are willing to pay for it.  As much as it sucks for those of us who won't, that's the ugly reality of a free-market economy.  Hooray for those folks who make their living selling guns.  

Yes, I happen to have two LE marked guns.  No, I didn't pay extra for them.  And yes, the one with the pony did happen to increase in value overnight.  Rest assured, you won't see either one on Gunbroker.      
4/23/2007 2:57:16 PM EDT
[#37]
I would throw the extra $100 into mags, or put it towards a case of ammo from the Ammoman. I use iron sights anyway and could never understand why guys put so much gadgetry on their ARs.
4/23/2007 3:04:52 PM EDT
[#38]
No LEO.
4/25/2007 8:03:48 AM EDT
[#39]
alright, well im getting the non LEO version. I would like to get a few extra magazines, what brand or style do you suggest? I am in Nevada so high caps are not a problem

Thanks
4/25/2007 10:30:32 AM EDT
[#40]
height=8
Quoted:
What kind of asshole wants to invest in something that represents a grossly unconstitutional law, in the unlikely event that they can turn a profit if our country ever passed another such law infringing upon a basic right? I guarantee if you buy it, you'll find yourself secretly hoping for another ban, just like all those assholes on gunbroker.

It just sounds like you would no sooner have a problem with a nazi symbol, or "Hilary 2008" engraved on the side of your receiver... the "For Law Enforcement Use Only" is a sick representation of what this country has been slowly turning into : a police state. Do you really want a reminder of what kind of screwed up legislation we had for 10 years?  

I wouldn't risk it either - if you ever have to USE that thing, the DA will run up and down your ass for having "For LE Use Only" on the side, trying to make it look like you thought you were a commando or something.

There are plenty of rare firearms to invest in. Having 'For LE Only' is rare, in much the same way that having an AR used in a mass shooting is rare. It's not something you want your hands to be on.


Pardon me? I'm a LEO & we don't run around checking the side of magwells to see if "LE/MILITARY USE ONLY" is stamped on the side of an AR owners rifle who does not fit either catagory. Actually, we've never had a suspect who has even used an AR in the commission of a crime where it would even matter. Although I'm not sure why a non-leo would want to have this stamp on his rifle, it's not illegal & the OP can buy what he wants. I don't sell my rifles so I'm not concerned with its markings to determine value. Mine are used for work/training & nothing else. They get banged up & continue to function so who cares.

No offense, but if you think this is a police state, then you quite possibly are more of a threat to society than a possible AWB. We have one of these types in my city who constantly posts on the local paper's web-site & yells this crap at us as we drive by. Down with the police state, cops are workers of the anti-christ, etc. He is a sick man. Your replies ring familiar with the crap we put up with from this metnally ill subject. Sorry for the thread jack, but I couldn't resist.
4/25/2007 10:58:07 AM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:
Nobody likes the LE markings? I would think they were kinda neat just to have..? no?


My LMT lower has the marking.  I like the looks of it.  Plus I shoot straighter and faster because of it
4/25/2007 12:00:44 PM EDT
[#42]
It's silly to think that a company would actually think they could get someone to pay anything (let alone $100) for a LEO-marked receiver.  I have an LMT LEO-marked lower and 2 non-marked LMT lowers.  I paid the same amount for all 3.  I would not have gotten the LEO-marked lower had they had non-marked ones in stock.  There are plenty of LEO's out there that have no clue about firearms laws and would still think it is illegal to have because of that marking.  I'd rather not go through the hassle of dealing with that if I can avoid it.
4/25/2007 1:10:33 PM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:

No offense, but if you think this is a police state, then you quite possibly are more of a threat to society than a possible AWB.


He did not say this is a police state, he said that  this country has been slowly turning into a police state. I know what he meant ... only police with LEO marked ARs will run around and enforce McCarthy's and Pelosi's gun laws.
He's not a threat to society. He's true American and supporter of Bill of Rights.
4/25/2007 1:15:20 PM EDT
[#44]
height=8
Quoted:
I have the choice to get either a Bushmaster AR-15 M4 a3 without the LE markings on it or one with LE markings on it for $100 more. Which would you choose and why?


I would get the one without the LE markings.
Sure, it looks cool, but I would worry that some law enforcement person who didn't have a full understanding of firearms laws, would mistakenly confiscate it from me.
Then I'd go through a hassle getting it back.
And after being thrown into a property room somewhere, how do I know I'll get it back in the same condition?
4/25/2007 1:22:15 PM EDT
[#45]
Well, if the LEO model comes with rails installed, I would go for it. Personally I dont mind the LEO only part, and it could at least be a conversation starter at the range. But really, I would go for it just because of the FF rails.
4/25/2007 1:35:12 PM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:

Quoted:

No offense, but if you think this is a police state, then you quite possibly are more of a threat to society than a possible AWB.


He did not say this is a police state, he said that  this country has been slowly turning into a police state. I know what he meant ... only police with LEO marked ARs will run around and enforce McCarthy's and Pelosi's gun laws.
He's not a threat to society. He's true American and supporter of Bill of Rights.


I would agree with you, Richard, but he did come on pretty strong by suggesting it would make you an asshole if you chose to buy a rifle with LE markings.

To each his own. But the fact that you have the option of buying one if you want one, proves our's isn't a police state.
4/25/2007 1:48:51 PM EDT
[#47]
Unless you need mags/ammo, take the $100 and buy a stripped lower.

Seydou

4/26/2007 3:52:26 AM EDT
[#48]
LEO ONLY  and if you are a CIVI


If you want to Pretend go for it
4/26/2007 5:19:36 AM EDT
[#49]
get both
AR Sponsor