Posted: 10/21/2013 2:16:05 PM EDT
| Will the POD work on the RAT stock? If not, I'm looking for a POD-like device for using a sand sack with the RAT stock. |
|
Quoted:
I think it will work, the slot is there for it. I'll try mine when I get home to see if it works.. Quoted:
Quoted:
Will the POD work on the RAT stock? If not, I'm looking for a POD-like device for using a sand sack with the RAT stock. I think it will work, the slot is there for it. I'll try mine when I get home to see if it works.. I'll defer to your knowledge but I was told when I looked into it a while back that it doesn't work. ETA ... Just to be clear ... I'd love to find out that it does ... Hopefully, ya'll have better information. |
|
Quoted:
I'll defer to your knowledge but I was told when I looked into it a while back that it doesn't work. ETA ... Just to be clear ... I'd love to find out that it does ... Hopefully, ya'll have better information. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Will the POD work on the RAT stock? If not, I'm looking for a POD-like device for using a sand sack with the RAT stock. I think it will work, the slot is there for it. I'll try mine when I get home to see if it works.. I'll defer to your knowledge but I was told when I looked into it a while back that it doesn't work. ETA ... Just to be clear ... I'd love to find out that it does ... Hopefully, ya'll have better information. Checking with my contacts in Leander now... 
|
|
Does not work in current configuration.
1) The lower spine of the CTR/MOE stock is small at the rear and gains thickness as you go toward the muzzle direction. The RAT is a consistent thickness from the rear bottom toward the muzzle end. The POD is graduated in thickness from the rear to the front to accommodate the dimensions of the CTR/MOE, thus too wide for the RAT. 2) The slot in the CTR on the bottom spine is at a sharper angle than the RAT. Therefore the screw holes do not line up. YET
|
|
Quoted:
Does not work in current configuration. 1) The lower spine of the CTR/MOE stock is small at the rear and gains thickness as you go toward the muzzle direction. The RAT is a consistent thickness from the rear bottom toward the muzzle end. The POD is graduated in thickness from the rear to the front to accommodate the dimensions of the CTR/MOE, thus too wide for the RAT. 2) The slot in the CTR on the bottom spine is at a sharper angle than the RAT. Therefore the screw holes do not line up. YET Roger that. Thank you! |
|
Quoted:
Does not work in current configuration. 1) The lower spine of the CTR/MOE stock is small at the rear and gains thickness as you go toward the muzzle direction. The RAT is a consistent thickness from the rear bottom toward the muzzle end. The POD is graduated in thickness from the rear to the front to accommodate the dimensions of the CTR/MOE, thus too wide for the RAT. 2) The slot in the CTR on the bottom spine is at a sharper angle than the RAT. Therefore the screw holes do not line up. YET Exactly..
|
|
I got it, thank you.
I wonder how close the Battle line Industries SAM would fit? Anyone have a RAT and SOPMOD for comparison? http://www.battlelineindustries.com/site/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage-ask.tpl&product_id=23&category_id=5&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=1&vmcchk=1&Itemid=1 |
