Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/31/2012 7:09:25 PM EDT
I am trying to run a TA11J / Offset T1 setup.

I just received my LT100 and started to mount it up when I noticed a few things:

- The mount I received is different to the one in all of the pictures on the Larue website showing the ACOG / T1 combo. The levers on the website are shown on the ejection port side facing the shooter. The one I received have them facing the muzzle.

- When mounted with levers on ejection port side, the ACOG body conflicts with the rear Troy BUIS body as shown below.

http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc218/mluning/LaRuePredatar556/Picture006.jpg
http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc218/mluning/LaRuePredatar556/Picture007.jpg
http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc218/mluning/LaRuePredatar556/Picture004.jpg

- When the levers are mounted on the other side, the TA11 sits forward. I do not own the Aimpoint T1 or LT724 yet, but I would imagine that this would not allow room for the offset mount and the lever would not latch because of the other lever from the LT100.

http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc218/mluning/LaRuePredatar556/Picture008.jpg
http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc218/mluning/LaRuePredatar556/Picture009.jpg

What gives? Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong? I have seen other peoples' setups on here with the levers facing forward, but their TA11s do not conflict with the rear Troy sight. Why the variation in LT100 mounts with the levers in different directions?

Thanks for any help,
Mike
10/31/2012 7:43:35 PM EDT
[#1]
The LT-100 with levers on the right is the LT-622.  That's what you are seeing in the pictures coupled with the LT-724.  I believe the LT-622 was made for a military contract.  When I've called to order one in the past they said they weren't available.  Occasionally I have seen them show up on the commercial market though.
10/31/2012 7:50:02 PM EDT
[#2]
So why do they advertise this TA11 with a 'LT100' with the levers on the right facing the shooter?

http://www.laruetactical.com/scopetrijicon-acog-35x35-illuminated-scope-green-crosshair-308-ballistic-reticle-and-lt100-acog-moun
11/1/2012 4:11:35 AM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
So why do they advertise this TA11 with a 'LT100' with the levers on the right facing the shooter?

http://www.laruetactical.com/scopetrijicon-acog-35x35-illuminated-scope-green-crosshair-308-ballistic-reticle-and-lt100-acog-moun


That picture is wrong, that's not the LT-100, it's the LT-622
11/1/2012 5:25:55 AM EDT
[#4]







Quoted:




So why do they advertise this TA11 with a 'LT100' with the levers on the right facing the shooter?
http://www.laruetactical.com/scopetrijicon-acog-35x35-illuminated-scope-green-crosshair-308-ballistic-reticle-and-lt100-acog-moun




Because they have the wrong picture up in that page. Look at the LT100's webpage and it's the mount you have.
http://www.laruetactical.com/larue-tactical-acog-mount-qd-lt-100






 
 
 
11/1/2012 6:08:48 AM EDT
[#5]
Those photos reflected a setup that the USMC desired.

LT100's have their levers on the left side. I believe you'll need to remove the rear sight to accommodate both the LT100 and the LT724 on the flat top. We'll clarify that on the web.
11/1/2012 11:42:56 AM EDT
[#6]
Well it's good to know that now after the fact that I have the goods and nothing is made clear anywhere on the website which have some misleading pictures and lack of information.

I hope I'm the last person that encounters this problem.

I'll keep the rear sight, mount, and TA11 and make it work by removing some of the ACOG body because I feel that this is a far more superior setup than anything out on the market right now.

No big deal. I appreciate y'alls help.
11/1/2012 1:09:01 PM EDT
[#7]





Quoted:



Well it's good to know that now after the fact that I have the goods and nothing is made clear anywhere on the website which have some misleading pictures and lack of information.





I hope I'm the last person that encounters this problem.





I'll keep the rear sight, mount, and TA11 and make it work by removing some of the ACOG body because I feel that this is a far more superior setup than anything out on the market right now.





No big deal. I appreciate y'alls help.
Before you start modifying anything, try the offset T1 on the rail right in front of the action. That's one of the purposes of the continuous rail system, that you can bridge the action and the rail, if needed. As for the pictures, I tend to look at both the combo page and the mount itself page, and I think I'd have noticed the pictures were different and asked about it.



Another option is take that rear sight off and get a LT103. Mount the LT 103 under the front rail and use it it like a hand stop. If you have to take the scope off, put the LT103 in it's place. That's one more step, but what's the odds of both the scope and the RDS going down and not having time to swap them. I've seen a few pics from the sandbox of our troops doing this.
 
 
11/1/2012 3:53:37 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Well it's good to know that now after the fact that I have the goods and nothing is made clear anywhere on the website which have some misleading pictures and lack of information.

I hope I'm the last person that encounters this problem.

I'll keep the rear sight, mount, and TA11 and make it work by removing some of the ACOG body because I feel that this is a far more superior setup than anything out on the market right now.

No big deal. I appreciate y'alls help.
Before you start modifying anything, try the offset T1 on the rail right in front of the action. That's one of the purposes of the continuous rail system, that you can bridge the action and the rail, if needed. As for the pictures, I tend to look at both the combo page and the mount itself page, and I think I'd have noticed the pictures were different and asked about it.

Another option is take that rear sight off and get a LT103. Mount the LT 103 under the front rail and use it it like a hand stop. If you have to take the scope off, put the LT103 in it's place. That's one more step, but what's the odds of both the scope and the RDS going down and not having time to swap them. I've seen a few pics from the sandbox of our troops doing this.

   


I agree, the last thing I would do is start grinding on the acog.  Even if the T1 mount is slightly on the handguard, I can't see that being an issue on your predatAR as the handguard is bolted to the receiver making it rock solid.

11/2/2012 11:21:33 AM EDT
[#9]
Would a rear KAC micro work instead of the Troy?

I would like to keep everything on the upper receiver and off the handguard, just personal preference.
11/23/2012 1:44:32 PM EDT
[#10]
Just an update.. The KAC micro does work.. and thank you Larue for updating your website on this topic.

http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc218/mluning/LaRuePredatar556/photo.jpg
11/23/2012 4:49:49 PM EDT
[#11]
When you get the T-1 mounted please post pics
11/24/2012 12:10:00 PM EDT
[#12]
Glad it worked out for you. For me your setup would end up giving me a black eye, because of the way I was taught to shoot a AR (M16A1) by the US Army.