Quoted:
I wonder why Colt would not add these better features to the same time frame AR15's?
View Quote
Cost, it cost Colt nothing to not add it, and people would still buy the gun. The only reason they added it later was because they totally eliminated the SP-1 separate production line for the lower and used M16A2 lowers that were modified (or not, depending on how you look at it) for the civillian production which actually further reduced their cost. It's all about cost.
The VERY original AR-15 had a separate pin and no detent. Sort of like a HK pin. You punched it out and it was free to be lost in the grass. The M16/M16A1 had a ridge along the top of the lower that contained the retaining detent pin. They are all push-pin models. Later M16/M16A1s had the mag fence which was just an "appendix" on the ridge that came down and went around the perimeter of the mag release. Remember that there isn't a deirect linear advance of the M16 series. It didn't go M16, XM16E1, M16A1, M16A2, etc. Remember the USAF used M16 without using the A1 and had all the updated features on later rifles. While that's the timeline of use in the service, many of the features carried into various different models. There was an on going Product Improvement Program that incorporated things like trapdoor butstock, etc. Those items appear during production and are just added to new rifles during the production run. As older parts broke and were replaced, the new versions were also used. So if you were to find an XM16E1 out there, it may have round handguards, since that's all the Army has in the system now.
All the military lowers are push-pin with the same design. The mag fence is just an extension of the ridge for this. The two screw is strictly SP-1.
Ross