Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/14/2004 8:33:18 PM EDT

M4 Sherman.  Atop it is a Japanese tank, to be transported back
for examination.  Marine's hand lies on another knocked-out
Japanese tank
12/14/2004 11:11:14 PM EDT
[#1]
Imagine the little jap tank next to a King Tiger!
12/15/2004 12:33:39 AM EDT
[#2]
Probably a Tankette Type 94.

Speaking of Japanese and Tiger tanks.  I have some pictures of when the Japanese were looking at the German tank factories in WW2 and have a photo of a Japanese soldier standing in the coplua of a Tiger Tank.  Very comical to me for some reason.

edit: spelled Japanese three different ways in that sentence
12/15/2004 2:15:20 AM EDT
[#3]
Yep, type 94.



GENERAL DATA
Other Designations Type 94 [Model 92 (1932) Tankette*]
Manufacturer(s) Tokyo Gasu Denki Kokyo, Mitsubishi, Jukogyo, Kobe Seikosho
Production Quantity n.a. Production Period n.a.
Type Tankette Crew 2
Length /hull (m) 3.08 Barrel Overhang (m) 0
Width /with skirts (m) 1.62 Height (m) 1.62
Combat Weight (kg) 3400 Radio Equipment n.a.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIREPOWER
Primary Armament 6.5mm Type 91 MG Ammunition Carried 1620
Traverse (degrees) (360°) Elevation (degrees) n.a.
Traverse speed (360°) n.a. Sight n.a.
Secondary Armament - Ammunition Carried -

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOBILITY CHARACTERISTICS
Engine Make & Model Type 94 No. of Links/Track n.a.
Type & Displacement In4 Track Width n.a.
Horsepower 32hp@1800rpm Track Ground Contact n.a.
Power/Weight Ratio 9.4 hp/t Ground Pressure  n.a.
Gearbox 4 forward, 1 reverse Ground Clearance (m) 0.29
Fuel Gasoline (Petrol) Turning Radius (m) n.a.
Range on/off road (km) 200 Gradient (degrees) 35°
Mileage (liters/100km) 53 Vertical Obstacle (m) 0.50
Fuel Capacity (liters) 106 Fording (m) 0.60
Speed on/off road 40 km/h Trench Crossing (m) 1.30


A tankette for sure.

The brewed up tank might be a Type 97.
12/16/2004 3:57:03 AM EDT
[#4]
tag
12/16/2004 4:11:02 AM EDT
[#5]
tag...tell me more!

SGatr15
12/16/2004 2:34:15 PM EDT
[#6]
I've seen pictures of Zhukov inspecting captured Japanese tanks after the Russians kicked them out of Manchuria. Needless to say after fighting the Germans he doesn't look impressed.
Read some story about Imo Jima maybe Tarawa about a Sherman taking a hit from a Japanese tank with 37mm and it turned the inside of the tank where the shell hit a lemon yellow, but didn't penetrate. The Sherman destroyed the Jap tank with one hit. For some reason I think the Sherman tank was called china gal. Maybe that will ring a bell with somebody.

12/16/2004 2:49:46 PM EDT
[#7]
It was at Tarawa
C Company, 1st Corps Tank Battalion ( M4A2 Sherman tanks)


interesting link if you want to read about the Shermans at Tarawa


Tarawa Shermans
12/16/2004 4:07:21 PM EDT
[#8]
A type 95 meets it's end.  Notice the small size of the tank.

12/16/2004 10:02:00 PM EDT
[#9]
It seems the japs were ahead of their time.   Already thinking about miniaturization.  

Probably learned the hard way it does not always work.    
12/17/2004 3:44:37 AM EDT
[#10]
better then the sherman slippin through a thick jungle
12/17/2004 4:05:18 AM EDT
[#11]
Except these tanks were developed after experiences in China.  Even the crappy Sherman might as well have been a Tiger tank to these things.
12/17/2004 5:12:28 AM EDT
[#12]
The Japanese just never got the whole mechanized/blitzkrieg thing. Of course alot of it had to do with the Armys mentality and Japan ability to produce heavy equipment.
12/17/2004 6:08:55 AM EDT
[#13]
I think some of it had to do with the terrain they were fighting in.  Heavy machinery would have been ineffective in most areas where the Japanese saw combat.  Even the U.S. relied mostly on Stuart tanks in the Pacific theater.  I think the Japanese were smart to focus a lot more of their resources on naval power early in the war.  They probably should have beefed up their air force more as the war progressed.  The army was not bad especially in defending and would have been more than adequate had the Japanese retained a pariety with the U.S. in the skies and water
12/19/2004 11:35:44 AM EDT
[#14]
The ultimate Japanese tank.



(These are Japanese envoys in Germany inspecting a Tiger I)
12/19/2004 3:03:38 PM EDT
[#15]
Look!  The Sherman is bringing home a new toy for itself!

Japanese tanks were effective when chasing underequipped, poorly trained Chinese footsoldiers who had no means of defense against armor.  It was a different thing when they fought Americans though.    BBQ human flesh, anyone?
12/22/2004 6:01:48 PM EDT
[#16]
Thats one reason they lost the war. and the Germans lost cause they were using horses.
12/22/2004 6:17:08 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
Thats one reason they lost the war. and the Germans lost cause they were using horses.