[ARCHIVED THREAD] - WANT! (Page 1 of 2)
|
Quoted:
that magwell seems like it would make mag change times worse not better. exactly. while I am far from a fan-boy, I think the Magpul lower is the smartest blend of classic lower and smart updates. The KAC lower is nice, but too many options I don't need. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
that magwell seems like it would make mag change times worse not better. exactly. while I am far from a fan-boy, I think the Magpul lower is the smartest blend of classic lower and smart updates. The KAC lower is nice, but too many options I don't need. I agree, but anybody who knows ARs would not have it a primary defence weapon. I think it would be "something different" after getting a primary AR or 2 |
|
I like it! It's different but too pricey for me. Now if I won the lottery this weekend, I'd get one but only after I bought an M1A Loaded, a Garand (Collectors Edition) and a full auto Thompson. |
|
I like the integrated enlarged trigger guard. I like the raised portions.
I don't like the "swoopy" mag well. Make the magwell straight across from just in front of the farthest forward hole in the trigger guard and I would probably consider one for my next build. I'd also probably not want the full auto marking. I know some like them on their semi only lowers but not my cup of tea. I'll wait until the marking is their for a reason other than decoration. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Every swinging dick with a CNC is turning out lowers. This is a good thing, imo. Yet the ONE slightly innovative design is the one no one can get their hands on. ![]() Please elaborate.... which one are you talking about? Cav Arms would be my guess. |






