Posted: 1/4/2002 3:11:09 PM EDT
| Check out this site, my buddy learned about it from a guy passing out pamphlets on Nellis A.F.B. today [url]getusout.org[/url] |
|
Quoted: Man those Birchers are like really stinky farts- the smell just lingers on and on... So you are FOR the UN? I never thought I would see the day when a gun owner would support the UN. We need to get out of the UN, and the UN out of the US. The John Birch Society is one of the best groups there is. I don't know why people have such a problem with them, other then having been indoctrinated by liberals. |
|
There's nothing wrong with the John Birch Society in general! I spent many a golden childhood memory at JBS Meetings with my parents back in the early 60s. Remember 'None Dare Call It Treason' by John Stormer? That's what I grew up on. They have gone a bit over the edge of late, but, hell, who hasn't? They are to the Conservative Movement what snake handlers are to Christianity! You know they have a point, but it just doesn't make good sense! Eric The(HellBarryGoldwaterWasn'tConservativeEnough,BackThen!)Hun[>]:)] |
|
There's nothing wrong with the John Birch Society in general! I spent many a golden childhood memory at JBS Meetings with my parents back in the early 60s. Yes, but your parents named you "EricTheHun"... Let me guess, they were addicted to their PEZ dispensers..? To make this all a bit more clear, I've taken the time to break this down into a simple algebraic formula: ((( [whacko] + [8P] ) * [smoke] ) * [sex] ) = [>]:)] |
| JFPO is also very anti-UN. I think we should probably retain membership if only to monitor and perhaps influence the goings on. On the other hand, if the U.S. pulled out that would pretty much be the end of the U.N. and that would be a good thing, all things considered. Every positive thing the U.N. does could be (is being) done better by individual nations and various NGOs. |
|
I thought William F. Buckley had a great idea some while back when he suggested that the US never vote in the General Assembly (where we usually get clobbered by Third World countries) and, instead, vote only in the Security Council where we are a permanent voting member. It would save us from being humiliated each and every time they come up with a resolution condemning 'the events of Sept 11, [b]but....[/b]'! But can we please just move the headquarters to Nairobi, or Durban, or Monrovia? That'd take a lotta polish off the apple. Eric The(AndPutTheUNInProperPerspectiveAsWell-AThirdWorldDisneyland!)Hun[>]:)] |
|
Quoted: I once went to a Birch meeting. Plenty of conspiratorial nonsense. That week they talked about how "foreign" (i.e., jewish) bankers were in a conspiracy to take over the world as part of the NWO. I didnt stay long. [b] What do you know about the Federal Reserve Bank ??[/b] |
|
Yeah, they do seem to rattle nowadays about the Bilderbergers, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, etc., too much for my tastes. Which is why I said before: 'They are to the Conservative Movement what snake handlers are to Christianity! You know they have a point, but it just doesn't make good sense!' Eric The(Older,Wiser,Now)Hun[>]:)] |
|
Quoted: Quoted: I once went to a Birch meeting. Plenty of conspiratorial nonsense. That week they talked about how "foreign" (i.e., jewish) bankers were in a conspiracy to take over the world as part of the NWO. I didnt stay long. [b] What do you know about the Federal Reserve Bank ??[/b] Besides it being unconstitutional? |
|
Quoted: [b]Bearlaker[/b], it was more or less directed at[b] Avtomat[/b], but you are correct. It just amazes me the number of people who think that the [b]FED[/b] is part of the U.S. Govn'. I guess this would include congress, since they are supposed to be the only legal source of money i.e. gold and silver coin or certificates thereof. Article 1 Sec. 8 |
|
Quoted: They are to the Conservative Movement what snake handlers are to Christianity! You know they have a point, but it just doesn't make good sense! Actually the current conservative movement fits that description better. The certainly don't make sense. For example: The government shouldn't interfere with Americans lives, but should interfere with lives of other peoples. The JBS and libertarians are the one who makes sense. The conservatives are killing liberty, slower than liberals, but killing it nonetheless. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: They are to the Conservative Movement what snake handlers are to Christianity! You know they have a point, but it just doesn't make good sense! Actually the current conservative movement fits that description better. The certainly don't make sense. For example: The government shouldn't interfere with Americans lives, but should interfere with lives of other peoples. The JBS and libertarians are the one who makes sense. The conservatives are killing liberty, slower than liberals, but killing it nonetheless. I'm inclined to agree. A politician is a politician. Some are just worse than others. No offense to that literal handful who aren't "just playing the game...". I'm ALL for getting out of the UN. I say disband the whole thing, but that's not realistic at the moment. But getting out IS. As for staying in just to see what's going on, well there's ways to get around that right? |
|
Quoted: I guess this would include congress, since they are supposed to be the only legal source of money i.e. gold and silver coin or certificates thereof. Article 1 Sec. 8 There are other monitary units out there in the US, for example: [url]www.norfed.com[/url] though I have never seen any of these floating around. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: They are to the Conservative Movement what snake handlers are to Christianity! You know they have a point, but it just doesn't make good sense! Actually the current conservative movement fits that description better. The certainly don't make sense. For example: The government shouldn't interfere with Americans lives, but should interfere with lives of other peoples. The JBS and libertarians are the one who makes sense. The conservatives are killing liberty, slower than liberals, but killing it nonetheless. Gore would have meant [b]FASTRACK[/b] Dubya is an [b]IVDRIP[/b]. |
|
For example: The government shouldn't interfere with Americans lives, but should interfere with lives of other peoples. Absolutely! I've always considered the leaders of our country to be in the same situation as if they were our lawyers - I don't care if they do right for other folks, I just want them to do right for us! Period. Eric The(Amen!)Hun[>]:)] |
|
As long as we always remember the US comes first and the UN last, we shouldn't have a problem. Bush has done it right , relegated them to a role of HAND OUT FOOD, and did all the diplomacy outside the UN, US to Britain, US to Germany, US to Italy, etc. But Clinton was just the opposited and would have gladly handed American Soveriegnty over to the UN, if it made him look more "GLOBAL". Bush Sr. was bad about using the UN as well. I think Will Buckley was right on with his statemnet, but I would keep that Organization in the US so as to keep tabs on things a little. Even though the puppets from the third world countries we are fighting now have no real knowledge of the goings on in their own countries and are basically only a show of psuedo government. I have come to the conclusion that all Third World Countries are mostly and basically lawless lands and only form any sort of stable "Looking" governments for the handouts from the US. Benjamin |