Posted: 1/20/2009 6:27:43 PM EDT
This may be playing semantics a bit, but according to Article II, Section 1 and Clause 8 of the Constitution the oath was not said correctly. Granted, Roberts screwed it up and then corrected himself but BHO repeated it incorrectly. 
ETA: Obviously you guys haven't read/paid attention to some of my subsequent posts. It is A JOKE. Boy, The general discussion crowd must take everything literally. I heard someone mention this earlier in the day... thought it was interesting but otherwise useless. I thought I would pass it along for the amusement of others but apparently the typed word doesn't translate sarcasm well. |
|
Quoted:
This may be playing semantics a bit, but according to Article II, Section 1 and Clause 8 of the Constitution the oath was not said correctly. Granted, Roberts screwed it up and then corrected himself but BHO repeated it incorrectly.  I knew if I read enough posts today somebody would be stupid enough to mention this. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
This may be playing semantics a bit, but according to Article II, Section 1 and Clause 8 of the Constitution the oath was not said correctly. Granted, Roberts screwed it up and then corrected himself but BHO repeated it incorrectly. I knew if I read enough posts today somebody would be stupid enough to mention this. I'm proud to say that I thought of it a couple of hours ago.  http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=818519&page=1&#-1
|
|
Quoted: He could have repeated everything that was said to him in ebonics and he would still have the job. The swearing in is just a formality. Fuck I am feeling screwed. He better not start his gun control shit. After that pre inaguration bullshit a swearing in done in ebonics would have fit in perfectly. As long as "whites embrace what's right", the world will be ok. |
|
Quoted:
You guys realize that Obongo opposed and voted against Justice Roberts' confimation, don't you? This afternoon was the first time in U.S. history where a president was sworn in (or not) by a Chief Justice he opposed. Interesting Maybe on the 23rd they will look at a birth certificate but I doubt it |
|
Now I need to change my sig line. Every time I see it I will think of this stupid thread.  |
|
Quoted: I thought it was funny. This may be playing semantics a bit, but according to Article II, Section 1 and Clause 8 of the Constitution the oath was not said correctly. Granted, Roberts screwed it up and then corrected himself but BHO repeated it incorrectly. ETA: Obviously you guys haven't read/paid attention to some of my subsequent posts. It is A JOKE. Boy, The general discussion crowd must take everything literally. I heard someone mention this earlier in the day... thought it was interesting but otherwise useless. I thought I would pass it along for the amusement of others but apparently the typed word doesn't translate sarcasm well.  And don't take it too personally. A couple threads from now someone will make the same semantical argument about a different subject, and they'll jump on anybody that doesn't agree.  |