[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Jesusland map - wiki (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 10/25/2008 10:21:45 AM EDT
|
Is this where we are headed? Ok by me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesusland_map |
|
Quoted: I appreciate you allowing me an out by claiming it was sarcasm, however...Quoted: Quoted: Yes, because allowing your country to be governed by religious zealots worked out SO well for the Afghanis... You win the "Dumbest Post of the Day" award. +1 Agreed...idiotic post of the day...or my sarcasm meter broke...either one From the link in the OP: Holders of these values are characterized by a high degree of faith in Evangelical Christianity, Yeah, tell me a gov't based on evangelical beliefs wouldn't get out of hand in a hurry. LOTS of people would have a problem with that, including a lot of red staters. Polarizing a population like that leads nowhere good. Besides, the remainder of the citizens in "Jesusland" would immediately become part of another continuum, with the more liberal christians on one end, and the hardliners at the other. PRESTO! Lefties vs. Righties all over again! If you think that sounds good, you didn't think it through. |
|
While I certainly don't want a theocracy, I fail to see much that the two have in common. Violence? I wouldn't say that's routine for Christians in this day and age. Muslims....not so much. Intolerance? Maybe, but the Muslim will kill you for it if he has half a chance. The Christian will just bore you to tears quoting scripture to back up his views... As for having an agenda other than putting country first: Quakers––––-maybe Mormans––––-possibly Roman Catholics––––sometimes But I've never met a Fundamentalist Christian who wasn't rabidly patriotic... |
|
Quoted: This map is interesting. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/be/2004_US_elections_purple_counties.png I didn't know New Mexico and Texas are so "blue." Rural vs. urban. |
|
Quoted: Same situation here.Quoted: This map is interesting. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/be/2004_US_elections_purple_counties.png I didn't know New Mexico and Texas are so "blue." Rural vs. urban. |
|
I just don't like the whole Jesusland thing. The Jesus part, mainly. Nothing against Jesus, but my belief or lack thereof doesn't come into play in my political ideology either way. So...lets let Jesusland take the bible belt, the dems the northeast and cali, and we'll take the rest. ![]() |
|
actually the idea would work if we went back to the Constitution and the first 10 Amendments. Kind of the way it was when it was first written. No that wouldn't automatically mean we could own slaves, or that women couldn't vote. (but we really should take a look at women voting, they really are too stupid to make important decisions as a general rule) But it would get rid of the application of the word "Congress" to all levels of government, which was never intended in the first place. In other words, Utah could be a bunch of mormons, Tenn could be christian or what ever, Texas could be beered up high tech rednecks, Idaho is where you shoot things..... And we would do well to carve out the State of Jefferson and include them. Maybe make a deal with Mexico, and give California back up to the Mendicino border... |
|
While it is bullshit, it does highlight one of the major problems with American politics these days. It's a choice between the socialist party and the christian party, and as an agnostic conservative, neither fits me well. I would revile living in both in the Jesusland and the People's Socialist Republic of Canada. While I view socialism as a much greater evil than modern American christianity, it would be nice to have a major candidate with whom I actually agreed on most rather than some of the issues.
"There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution." -John Adams |
|
Quoted: Fact Religion holds society BACK. It's been that way for 1000's of years and it's not any different now. pfft- whatever... like religous supression caused the dark ages or something. The church has always supported scientific explanations and is at the forefront of scientific research. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Fact Religion holds society BACK. It's been that way for 1000's of years and it's not any different now. pfft- whatever... like religous supression caused the dark ages or something. The church has always supported scientific explanations and is at the forefront of scientific research. The Catholic Church is.... |
|
Quoted: In a small bit of irony - 'catholic church' chows up as an ad link. Quoted: Quoted: Fact Religion holds society BACK. It's been that way for 1000's of years and it's not any different now. pfft- whatever... like religous supression caused the dark ages or something. The church has always supported scientific explanations and is at the forefront of scientific research. The Catholic Church is.... ![]() |
|
Quoted: Leftists seem to hate Christians (and Jews and other people with any common belief that isn't Islam for that matter) and yet I don't see Christians running willy nilly up and down the streets burning symbols of those that mock their religion. Unlike some other religion...that get upset over a single cartoon. http://balder.org/muhammed/billeder-muhammed/Islamists-Anti-Cartoon-Protest.jpg There not much left that the christians didn't burn. They obliterated just about any other culture them came in contact with that they viewed as a threat. |






