Posted: 8/29/2008 5:07:42 PM EDT
|
....when humans alter their environment, it's regarded as "unnatural". But when other species alter their environment it's "natural"? For example, if humans build a dam, flood a river and kill off a few dozen species of plants or animals it an abomination of nature. But when a colony of beaver build a dam, flood a river and kill of a few dozen species of plants or animals, it's "nature at work"? If, according to the evolutionists (which a majority of environmentalists tend to be) we evolved from ancient primates, and thus we are no more "special" than any other species of animal, why are our actions regarded as unnatural? I mean, if monkeys could build nuclear bombs, would the greenies regarded mushroom clouds as natural? RF |
Damn dirty Apes
I swear, we need a "rimshot" animation on this board.  As to the original subject, you don't truly expect radical leftist assholes to apply logic to anything, do you? |
Some of you guys crack me up.