Posted: 4/22/2008 7:20:51 AM EDT
|
Re: http://www.nrapublications.org/oj/nobullets.html This is a good article. And I'm reminded, by the article, of what Daniel Estulin tells us was a topic of heated discussion at the 2006 Bilderberger meetings. Namely, that the gun-totting, constitutionalists in the U.S. are the last, single, great obstacle in the way of their plans for a North Ameircan Union. Further, it was said at these meetings that armed conflict seemed inevitable against this U.S. political block of resisters. Sure, the Iraq war and inflation may be making ammo scarce and expensive, but there's likely more things at work now, or in the future, to limit ammo availabliity. A gun can only be used to fight back against tyranny if there's ammo for that gun. |
|
The Poll, the vote, Brother....a revolution is an utterly last resort and we know not what kind of Government would follow that, depending on who won...either a sicko socialistic mess or a iron fisted dictatorship... We must try to bring the one we have back to sanity as in older times....Clean house, so to speak, send pukes back to their palaces in Mass. and Kalifornia & elsewhere and keep them out of politics. 
|
BUY RELOADER and Black powder weapons |
|
so.....if it stamps a serial on the back of the brass, i guess those brass catching bags will be selling like hot cakes. I mean, if there is no brass left laying around, how will those detectives ever solve a crimehey Or, would there be a serial number on the box, and when sold the dealer would log that number into a database? Either way, the criminals will always figure it out and us law abiding citizens will always be fuked on way or another. |
I follow your thinking. My post contained information about the thinking of those attending Bilderberger. What I didn't say was that there was also discussion about initiating that conflict, as well. As far as my personal opinion goes, well, I didn't state any. It wouldn't be kosher for this most polite forum to discuss realities about which few are congnisant. But I will add that your idea is a perpetual back-stepping methodology. With a population that employs only your solution, the slow cook method is the easy way to win. Within a few generations you can't even recognise what was originally the makeup of that population. This is the same as the U.S., as this method has been applied here with scientific precision. Others like to compare this to the proverbial cooking frog on low heat. It is an obviously flawed solution to political crisis, and one that fails to understand the entire picture, as it only encompasses a narrow band of awareness about the problem. The current prez race is an example. To vote out a totally corrupt regime, you get three equally owned and operated candidates from which to choose. Oh, and let's be sure to keep in mind that votes are also controlled via electronic machinery. |