Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/8/2008 9:38:04 AM EDT
I have a hydramatic M16 serial 3244***

Need some quick info and don't have time to research

The lower receiver says M16A1
I assume that would be its original configuration

It now has:
A1 grip
M4 Stock
16inch 1/9 Hbar
Round midlength tapered grips
A1 upper without shell deflector
Tear drop assist

I also assume this is just a rebarreled upper and the stock was swapper.

Any insight what I could have on my hands here?
3/8/2008 9:41:23 AM EDT
[#1]
I hope you have a Form 4 to go with this.    Click on the Retro section for lots of info on the Vietnam-era M16 rifles.  Lots of pics there, too.  
3/8/2008 9:41:28 AM EDT
[#2]
I would hope it is NFA registered . These were originally A1 configured guns made during the Vietnam war. I had hydromatic issued to me when I was in the Army in 79-80.
3/8/2008 9:43:03 AM EDT
[#3]
...Greased lightning?
3/8/2008 9:43:12 AM EDT
[#4]
What they said.  Retro guys would know best I would think.  I don't think the GM receivers were ever made as semis.
3/8/2008 9:43:37 AM EDT
[#5]
If its registered properly, you are a lucky man.

Of not, hide your dog........NOW!!!!
3/8/2008 9:48:44 AM EDT
[#6]
It belongs to the Gov. hinking.gif

Its a true M16 FA receiver without the auto sear
3/8/2008 9:53:47 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
It belongs to the Gov.

Its a true M16 FA receiver without the auto sear


*post deleted because people here lack sarcasm*
3/8/2008 9:54:57 AM EDT
[#8]
Everything is legalJust struck me as odd given its current configuration so I asked here
3/8/2008 9:55:06 AM EDT
[#9]
I love the immediate assumption that he has an unregistered NFA item

Can't someone ask a question without getting a slew of comments telling him he'd better have a form 4?




Case in point:


Quoted:

Quoted:
It belongs to the Gov.

Its a true M16 FA receiver without the auto sear


wow you could be in trouble..



Some people here seriously need to grow up.
3/8/2008 9:58:27 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
Everything is legal

Just struck me as odd given its current configuration so I asked here


sounds to me like it's just a parts bin mongrel now


i like the hydramatic guns, don't get to see them very often anymore.

are you in a position that you can work on it and restore it, or is it set up the way it is as a duty gun?
3/8/2008 9:59:33 AM EDT
[#11]
If you find Hydramatic  3020774 say hello for me
3/8/2008 10:03:08 AM EDT
[#12]
Send your dog to a friend's house BATF will be around shortly to verify your story.
3/8/2008 10:03:17 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
I love the immediate assumption that he has an unregistered NFA item

Can't someone ask a question without getting a slew of comments telling him he'd better have a form 4?




Case in point:


Quoted:

Quoted:
It belongs to the Gov.

Its a true M16 FA receiver without the auto sear


wow you could be in trouble..



Some people here seriously need to grow up.


wtf is your problem? he gives a vague explanation and many of us done know what to think. What do you expect?

Now it sounds like its something built off a parts kit when he gave us an explanation of the lower.
3/8/2008 10:07:26 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:


wtf is your problem? he gives a vague explanation and many of us done know what to think. What do you expect?

Someone says they have a rifle that belongs to the government,

Your response:  "wow you could be in trouble".

Is it inconceivable that this man has been issued this particular weapon?  Why would you immediately assume that he is illegally in possession of said weapon?

It's pretty sad when someone comes here with a legitimate question and they have to deal with nonsensical accusations and other assorted bunk.
3/8/2008 10:10:53 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

It's pretty sad when someone comes here with a legitimate question and they have to deal with nonsensical accusations and other assorted bunk.




Welcome to the General Discussion Forum..................    
3/8/2008 10:11:30 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:

Quoted:


wtf is your problem? he gives a vague explanation and many of us done know what to think. What do you expect?

Someone says they have a rifle that belongs to the government,

Your response:  "wow you could be in trouble".

Is it inconceivable that this man has been issued this particular weapon?  Why would you immediately assume that he is illegally in possession of said weapon?

It's pretty sad when someone comes here with a legitimate question and they have to deal with nonsensical accusations and other assorted bunk.


I... WAS... JOKING....

i forgot to add my face..
3/8/2008 10:16:25 AM EDT
[#17]
Alot of M16A1's of that vintage are "loaned" to Police Departments.  Many of those are modified to semi only by removing the auto sear, or installing a block.  They are still owned by the US Govt and no permanent mods can be made because they have to be able to be returned to original condition if Uncle Same needs them back.  Yes, they are still MG's, as in once a MG always a MG.  

Many of these same rifles are modified by the PD with a different barrel, telestock, etc. to make them easier to handle from a patrol car.

My take on it is the OP is a cop, who has a M16A1 that has been transferred from the Army to the PD and the PD has modified it as required for their use, and only "reversible" mods due to the DoA regs.  

Perfectly legal.  They are basically "transferred" to the PD, but the Army still owns them.

ETA: the M16A1 John Wayne used in "The Green Berets" was a Hydramatic.  I was issued one as well in my younger days.  GM made a fine M16A1.
3/8/2008 10:19:30 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:

Quoted:


wtf is your problem? he gives a vague explanation and many of us done know what to think. What do you expect?

Someone says they have a rifle that belongs to the government,

Your response:  "wow you could be in trouble".

Is it inconceivable that this man has been issued this particular weapon?  Why would you immediately assume that he is illegally in possession of said weapon?

It's pretty sad when someone comes here with a legitimate question and they have to deal with nonsensical accusations and other assorted bunk.


+1
I find GD a little rough around the edges if you know what ii mean. You should post this in the Retro, or AR forums next time. Sorry i didnt even know Hydramatic made M16's.

BTW as a side note i work and live about 0.5 miles from the hydramatic plant here in Toledo Ohio.
3/8/2008 10:21:33 AM EDT
[#19]
I deleted my post because I fail at sarcasm, sorry guys.
3/8/2008 10:22:26 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
...Greased lightning?


heh..i just now got it. (from movie grease)
3/8/2008 10:30:14 AM EDT
[#21]
Hydramatic thread from earlier this week.


Proof the USN doesnt throw anything away.
3/8/2008 10:41:57 AM EDT
[#24]
Couldn't you slap a modern upper on that gun? It isn't a permanent modification as you can remove it and stick the original back on it if you have to return it. It just looks wrong with a shorty HBAR.

Or is that against the rules for whoever issued it?
3/8/2008 10:45:17 AM EDT
[#25]
The flagging is to mark it out of service

The prior armorer may have destroyed the lower, you can also see his handywork on the casltenut. It looks like he used vicegrips on it

height=8
Quoted:
Couldn't you slap a modern upper on that gun? It isn't a permanent modification as you can remove it and stick the original back on it if you have to return it. It just looks wrong with a shorty HBAR. hat
3/8/2008 10:50:14 AM EDT
[#26]
It still looks better than alot of transferable M16s in civvie hands. The pin holes aren't all mangled and the finish is all there.

If the previous guy didn't bust up all the insides you should be able to just slap a new upper on it and get a new castle nut, tube, and stock.  
Maybe get a new FA bolt-carrier group with improved extractor and a Colt extra heavy buffer to improve reliability over the original parts.
3/8/2008 10:55:25 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:

It's pretty sad when someone comes here with a legitimate question and they have to deal with nonsensical accusations and other assorted bunk.




Welcome to the General Discussion Forum..................    



thats no shit!!!
3/8/2008 10:59:49 AM EDT
[#28]
The last time it was assembled the buffer was able to creep out enough that the buffer retainer pin was able to unscrew itself and get struck by the bolt when the rifle was fired.

How this was able to happen I don't know, but where the retainer pin screws into the lower the metal is slightly deformed and has visible fatigue.

It is going back to the central cache.
3/8/2008 11:05:49 AM EDT
[#29]
Carried a Hydramatic as an Army grunt back in the 80's.
3/8/2008 11:10:09 AM EDT
[#30]
That's a shame, from the outside the lower doesn't look that bad.
3/8/2008 11:11:19 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
The flagging is to mark it out of service

The prior armorer may have destroyed the lower, you can also see his handywork on the casltenut. It looks like he used vicegrips on it



I was gonna ask about what butchershop you had that serviced at...LOL...
3/8/2008 11:14:08 AM EDT
[#32]
Sounds like a PD Gunplumber filed off too much of the receiver extension, now the buffer retainer pops out.  A new receiver extension and castle nut will fix that.  

You can get the trade discount at Brownell's if you register as LEO

10 82 A probably means was rebuilt at Anniston Army Depot, Alabama in Oct 82.
3/8/2008 11:17:56 AM EDT
[#33]
They were made in my hometown of Ypsilanti, MI. The Hydramatic plant is a real gem.
Across the street is a plant that was the B-24 plant built by Ford, later it was a GM plant that built tanks on the side. The Corvair was GM's product during the early years, later it was the Caprice.
3/8/2008 11:23:29 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:


wtf is your problem? he gives a vague explanation and many of us done know what to think. What do you expect?

Someone says they have a rifle that belongs to the government,

Your response:  "wow you could be in trouble".

Is it inconceivable that this man has been issued this particular weapon?  Why would you immediately assume that he is illegally in possession of said weapon?

It's pretty sad when someone comes here with a legitimate question and they have to deal with nonsensical accusations and other assorted bunk.


+1
I find GD a little rough around the edges if you know what ii mean. You should post this in the Retro, or AR forums next time. Sorry i didnt even know Hydramatic made M16's.

BTW as a side note i work and live about 0.5 miles from the hydramatic plant here in Toledo Ohio.
Wrong Hydramatic plant,the M16s were made up in Ypsilanti MI,same as the Corvair. You'd cry if you saw what was there,it's also(or it was)GM's junkyard.Corvettes,Caddy's,you name it,all junked there.

I carried a Hydramatic no-trap-door stock in basic,1986,Ft Leonard Wood.
3/8/2008 11:30:16 AM EDT
[#35]
Everything appears to be in order now, internally.

It passes all the function tests, but I'm told it wont cycle. (using frangible ammo, but that shouldn't make a difference)

It's out of service for now, but I will take it to the range and see how it does.

height=8
Quoted:
Sounds like a PD Gunplumber filed off too much of the receiver extension, now the buffer retainer pops out.  A new receiver extension and castle nut will fix that.  

You can get the trade discount at Brownell's if you register as LEO

10 82 A probably means was rebuilt at Anniston Army Depot, Alabama in Oct 82.
3/8/2008 11:34:36 AM EDT
[#36]
Bushmaster barrel.  Probably the PD wanted something more handy than the A1, and bought a bunch of Bushy "shorty conversion kits" that basically were the front end and back end.  Then assembled them on the original upper/lower combo.