Posted: 10/4/2005 12:04:16 PM EDT
|
Sorry if its already been posted. I didnt see it. http://www.nbc5.com/travelgetaways/5053722/detail.html?z=dp&dpswid=1167317&dppid=65172 Not hot linked for a reason. |
|
Hit it Yes, I feel less safe now. 12588 57% Yes, I feel safer now. 4163 19% No, the law does not change anything for me. 5316 24% Those libtards have already fucked the issue over. They have split the vote between two questions of the RTKBA supporters, leaving the anti gunners with one choice. |
|
------------------------------------------------------------- Does Florida's "stand your ground" law change your opinion of the state? Choice Votes Percentage of 23318 Votes Yes, I feel less safe now. 13269 57% Yes, I feel safer now. 4498 19% No, the law does not change anything for me. 5551 24% |
I believe you are mistaken. "citizens no longer are obligated to retreat from an attack if they're somewhere they have a legal right to be, such as a public street" |
|
niceguymr, I recall hearing Andrew P. Napolitano comment on it this weekend and he said it only applies when you're on your own property. He ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the 5 minutes between my post and -Absolut-'s, the poll changed like this: Yes, I feel less safe now. +31 Yes, I feel safer now. +22 No, the law does not change anything for me. +14 Somewhere some libtard is having peeps hit the poll in the same manner that we are. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The 2005 Florida Statutes Title XLVI CRIMES Chapter 776 JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE View Entire Chapter 776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.-- (1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if: (a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person's will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and (b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred. (2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if: (a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or (b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or (c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or (d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer. (3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony. (4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person's dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence. (5) As used in this section, the term: (a) "Dwelling" means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night. (b) "Residence" means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest. (c) "Vehicle" means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property. History.--s. 1, ch. 2005-27 |
|
The only people who should feel less safe are those who are planning on attacking a fellow citizen, breaking into a private residence, carjacking, etc. Are there really that many rapists, murderers, carjackers, and other violent criminals out there that 50+ percent of the people on the poll reply "I feel less safe"? Jim |