Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
7/26/2005 3:13:39 PM EDT
www.gunowners.org/a071405.htm


Thursday, July 14, 2005

Pro-gun Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is getting ready to introduce a bill that would block the United Nations from implementing gun control measures affecting U.S. citizens.

Entitled the "UN Second Amendment Protection Act of 2005," the bill does still not have a number, as Sen. Vitter is trying to get original cosponsors to join him.

Gun owners across America are increasingly victorious in legislative and elective battles at the local, state and national levels. Nevertheless, anti-gun internationalists, long burrowed in the UN headquarters, are planning, with some success, massive international gun control measures.

This entire week, the UN is holding the second biennial meeting of States to consider the implementation of the Program of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects.

Though couched in the flowery rhetoric of protecting victims of violence, the goal of the conference is nothing short of global gun control. The rabid gun banners to our north would seem to agree. "From Canada's perspective.... serious attention should be given to the regulation of civilian possession of small arms," said Tim Martin, head of Canada's delegation to the conference.

Sen. Vitter has meticulously documented and highlighted for his senate colleagues some of the most egregious proposals, including:

* A comprehensive program for worldwide gun control and a total ban on certain types of firearms;
* The establishment of an international tracking certificate which would be used to ensure UN monitoring control over the export, import, transit, stocking, and storage of legal small arms and light weapons;
* Worldwide record keeping for an indefinite amount of time on the manufacture, holding and transfer of small arms and light weapons;
* National registries and tracking lists of all legal firearms.
"The U.N. has no business interfering with our Second Amendment rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers," Sen. Vitter said.

Much of the UN's agenda was conceived in a 1995 proposal, and then adopted as a Program of Action in 2001. At that time, then-Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security John Bolton led the U.S. opposition to the Program. The United States has neither signed nor ratified the Program.

Sen. Vitter's bill will prohibit any U.S. funding to the UN unless the President certifies that the world body "has not taken action to restrict, attempt to restrict or otherwise adversely infringe upon the rights of individuals in the United States to possess a firearm or ammunition."

ACTION: Please contact your two senators and urge them to cosponsor the Vitter bill. You can visit the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators a pre-written e-mail message.


7/26/2005 3:19:12 PM EDT
[#1]






Any more questions?
7/26/2005 3:23:27 PM EDT
[#2]

"The U.N. has no business interfering with our Second Amendment rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers," Sen. Vitter said.



+ 1 million
7/26/2005 3:24:12 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:

"The U.N. has no business interfering with our Second Amendment rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers," Sen. Vitter said.



+ 1 million




Neither should OUR government!
7/26/2005 3:25:57 PM EDT
[#4]
This is definitely not going to sit well with the Brady Bunch at HCI/CPHV etc.
7/26/2005 3:26:40 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:

Quoted:

"The U.N. has no business interfering with our Second Amendment rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers," Sen. Vitter said.



+ 1 million




Neither should OUR government!



++

The UN can definately go fuck itself.
7/26/2005 3:26:56 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:

"The U.N. has no business interfering with our Second Amendment rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers," Sen. Vitter said.



+ 1 million




Neither should OUR government!



no doubt...but look how thats been going so far...
7/26/2005 3:30:18 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:


0cents.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/Stamp_Image_UN_Blue_Helmet.jpg


Any more questions?



Enough said.....

[Mel Gibson}ANd lord, About the UN, Help us blow those commie bastards straight to hell[/Mel Gibson]
7/26/2005 3:36:28 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
This is definitely not going to sit well with the Brady Bunch at HCI/CPHV etc.



Yeah, so?
7/26/2005 3:57:16 PM EDT
[#9]
Fuck the Communist UN and every horse or third world shit box they rode in on.
7/26/2005 4:00:16 PM EDT
[#10]


I do not recognize the authority of the U.N. to dictate what I will or will not do with my life. If they want my guns, they can come and get them.
7/26/2005 4:06:35 PM EDT
[#11]
BAD IDEA


1] Why do we need a law to preserve the Constitution

2] Enacting this will only legitimize the efforts of antis when they later have enough power to change the law. They'll say that even Republicans recognized that such a possibility was reasonable as they enacted legislation to prevent it.


Bad tactical move, looks good on the face of it but lacks vision.
7/26/2005 4:11:57 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
img127.imageshack.us/img127/7776/unhelmetsmall4rc.jpg

I do not recognize the authority of the U.N. to dictate what I will or will not do with my life. If they want my guns, they can come and get them.



My Sentiments EXACTLY
7/26/2005 4:14:03 PM EDT
[#13]
someone needs to point out to the un that it's despotic .gov that has killed more people than anything else in history.