CNN, MSNOW and Politico banned from White House (Page 9 of 9)
|
Originally Posted By Master_Blaster: The smart PR move would be to announce reassignment of press passes to, "...those orgs with predominant viewership ratings in order to reach the most Americans possible," because efficiency. What would be the counterpoint argument? Umm, it's those orgs with predominant viewership ratings that are the problem. They have become accustomed to being fawned over due to their ratings rather than held accountable for their content. |
I have no useful skills, therefore I supervise.
Call sign:Radio Silence
Call sign:Radio Silence
USPSA Master Race
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
27551
EE: 100% (49)
WI, USA
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: So, basically just another news source, but with the ability to fact check the fake post, unlike CNN et al.? Works for me. You sure seem to be a champion for liberal media. You can fact check any news source 
|
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: You can fact check any news source And those we checked from the likes of CNN and others show inconsistent and erroneous quotes, altered and missing content/context, as well as clearly falsified information from suspect documents passed on as legitimate "unconfirmed" sources in order to vilify this administration. They have had an agenda against this administration going back to Trump's first presidency, and have acted in the interest of liberal policies. Those news agencies have been clearly shown to not just have a liberal bias, but have in fact been repeatedly shown to be antagonistic towards this administration. Try as hard as you want, play the poor pitiful card for those agencies, but they have lost their credibility. COVID was a major turning point as far as media trust, they sold out for government propaganda (when it suited them) and rating points at the price of the American public. The fact that you're defending them speaks volumes about your political lean. Edit to add, forgot the  to add credence to my post. |
I have no useful skills, therefore I supervise.
Call sign:Radio Silence
Call sign:Radio Silence
|
Originally Posted By nightstalker: Zoom meetings, no pants Shame. THey still have no shame. |
Brought back from the beyond to be a half-dead short-bus riding seat warmer in the Dracula factory.
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
USPSA Master Race
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
27552
EE: 100% (49)
WI, USA
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: And those we checked from the likes of CNN and others show inconsistent and erroneous quotes, altered and missing content/context, as well as clearly falsified information from suspect documents passed on as legitimate "unconfirmed" sources in order to vilify this administration. They have had an agenda against this administration going back to Trump's first presidency, and have acted in the interest of liberal policies. Those news agencies have been clearly shown to not just have a liberal bias, but have in fact been repeatedly shown to be antagonistic towards this administration. Try as hard as you want, play the poor pitiful card for those agencies, but they have lost their credibility. COVID was a major turning point as far as media trust, they sold out for government propaganda (when it suited them) and rating points at the price of the American public. The fact that you're defending them speaks volumes about your political lean. Edit to add, forgot the to add credence to my post.What’s any of that got to do with your implication that they can’t be fact checked(which is utterly false)? I’m not defending them at all. In fact, I’ve done the opposite. You are reading what you want to read. Or just not understanding my position. |
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: What’s any of that got to do with your implication that they can’t be fact checked(which is utterly false)? I’m not defending them at all. In fact, I’ve done the opposite. You are reading what you want to read. Or just not understanding my position. Yeah, you are defending them, do I really need to do some screen caps from earlier in this thread? As to my “implications” as far as fact checked, quite the opposite, I’ve shown how consistently the main stream news sources have been antagonistic and verging on libel for the way they portray this president and administration. Never anywhere have I said they couldn’t be fact checked. Your idea of opposite and mine certainly do not agree, your whole argument has been in favor of returning them their credentials out of some misguided belief that what this administration has done is against the constitution. And let me remind you, those news sources are free to exercise their 1A constitutional rights, they can continue to post what they want, just not at the press briefings which is a privilege, NOT a right. Thank you for your attention in this matter. |
I have no useful skills, therefore I supervise.
Call sign:Radio Silence
Call sign:Radio Silence
USPSA Master Race
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
27553
EE: 100% (49)
WI, USA
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: Yeah, you are defending them, do I really need to do some screen caps from earlier in this thread? As to my “implications” as far as fact checked, quite the opposite, I’ve shown how consistently the main stream news sources have been antagonistic and verging on libel for the way they portray this president and administration. Never anywhere have I said they couldn’t be fact checked. Your idea of opposite and mine certainly do not agree, your whole argument has been in favor of returning them their credentials out of some misguided belief that what this administration has done is against the constitution. And let me remind you, those news sources are free to exercise their 1A constitutional rights, they can continue to post what they want, just not at the press briefings which is a privilege, NOT a right. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Didn’t read past “do you need me to screen cap them.” Do it then. You won’t post anything that says I’ve defended MSM bias. In fact I pointed it out and called it hack journalism. ETA yes you absolutely implied that they couldn’t be fact checked: Attached File Just forget it. I’m not wasting any more time on you. |
|
Originally Posted By t3ddt3ch: Welcome to state run media! Becoming more like China everyday. Yeah, CNN was already there. They are 100% the propaganda arm of the liberal political establishment, NOT "journalists". Just like in China. |
Beware the Liberal. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.
|
Originally Posted By HobbitHunter: Atrocious fucking timing. Esit to add: could've/should've done this long ago, not a month and a half before mid terms. You think anyone who isn't a far left loon cares about CNN or MSNBC? Anyone who thinks those are NOT far left leaning isn't voting for our country anyway... so no loss. |
Beware the Liberal. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him; drive him back into his jungle lair, for he is the harbinger of death.
Joined:
Jun 2024
Posts:
2483
EE: 100% (2)
SC, USA
USPSA Master Race
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
27559
EE: 100% (49)
WI, USA
Indelible in the Hippocampus, the Sylvan
Joined:
Nov 2000
Posts:
102254
EE: 100% (7)
CA, USA
|
Originally Posted By Colt1860: Wasn't this just about the end of the world when Obama did it? This shit is retarded B A N A N A S After what they just pulled with the other 3 banned networks, WaPo should also be banned |
"We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared so we may always be free." Ronald Reagan 1984
"Mitch the almost dead democrat bitch"
2026, the bigger better democrat election fraud
"Mitch the almost dead democrat bitch"
2026, the bigger better democrat election fraud
|
Originally Posted By Chaingun: Obama did it and Biden did it. No it barely made news. After what they just pulled with the other 3 banned networks, WaPo should also be banned No need. WaPo and Fox just self deported from the briefings. |
Bad things happen in isolated instances in an armed populace, horrific things happen to a disarmed populace. 20th Century Democide https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Didn't read past "do you need me to screen cap them." Do it then. You won't post anything that says I've defended MSM bias. In fact I pointed it out and called it hack journalism. ETA yes you absolutely implied that they couldn't be fact checked: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/578900/IMG_8783_jpeg-3831088.JPG Just forget it. I'm not wasting any more time on you. Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: Yeah, you are defending them, do I really need to do some screen caps from earlier in this thread? As to my "implications" as far as fact checked, quite the opposite, I've shown how consistently the main stream news sources have been antagonistic and verging on libel for the way they portray this president and administration. Never anywhere have I said they couldn't be fact checked. Your idea of opposite and mine certainly do not agree, your whole argument has been in favor of returning them their credentials out of some misguided belief that what this administration has done is against the constitution. And let me remind you, those news sources are free to exercise their 1A constitutional rights, they can continue to post what they want, just not at the press briefings which is a privilege, NOT a right. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Didn't read past "do you need me to screen cap them." Do it then. You won't post anything that says I've defended MSM bias. In fact I pointed it out and called it hack journalism. ETA yes you absolutely implied that they couldn't be fact checked: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/578900/IMG_8783_jpeg-3831088.JPG Just forget it. I'm not wasting any more time on you. A lie can travel half way around the world before the truth gets its shoes on. |
USPSA Master Race
Joined:
Feb 2023
Posts:
27561
EE: 100% (49)
WI, USA
|
Originally Posted By Whippet06: What's the point of fact checking them after the lie has already been spread to millions of people? So, a handful of people on some web forum will know it was BS. Wow, that really helps. More people will have heard the lie than the fact check. A lie can travel half way around the world before the truth gets its shoes on. A man can do his own research quite easily. The truth is most are too lazy to do it. Or, they don’t want the truth. They want their belief validated. That’s why Twitter links get posted all over GD all the time without verification. Twitter tards bank on those people for their engagement metrics. The days of honest and unbiased reporting are long behind us, unfortunately. Nobody just reports the facts. |
|
Originally Posted By gtsteve03: So...? Originally Posted By gtsteve03: Originally Posted By TheAvatar9265ft: And yet ZeroHedge is allowed... So...? (They’re a Russian propaganda/disinformation outlet) Not all fake news is created equal, I guess. That said, fuck CNN et al. |
Not fly enough to be halal....
Trump tells CNN you shouldn't be here covering me.  Trump Arrives at UN with Melania For Speech as Infamous Escalator Works This Time Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By realwar: Trump tells CNN you shouldn't be here covering me.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWoNlLIvfCYhttps://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2026-09-22_at_07-57-05__5__Re-3831150.JPG Trump doesn't look 'as well' as usual here, but I confess to not watching anything with him in a video in a long time. |
"Some of the greatest dads I've ever seen weren't so much perfect as they were willing to work hard to overcome their failings. Does that make sense?"
Yes. Yes it does.
Yes. Yes it does.
|
JD Vance jokingly asks if CNN or Politico are here to ask any questions. Attached File
|
Joined:
Feb 2026
Posts:
8
EE: 0% (0)
OK, USA
Attached File
|
Joined:
Jul 2026
Posts:
481
EE: 0% (0)
TN, USA
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: And those we checked from the likes of CNN and others show inconsistent and erroneous quotes, altered and missing content/context, as well as clearly falsified information from suspect documents passed on as legitimate "unconfirmed" sources in order to vilify this administration. They have had an agenda against this administration going back to Trump's first presidency, and have acted in the interest of liberal policies. Those news agencies have been clearly shown to not just have a liberal bias, but have in fact been repeatedly shown to be antagonistic towards this administration. Try as hard as you want, play the poor pitiful card for those agencies, but they have lost their credibility. COVID was a major turning point as far as media trust, they sold out for government propaganda (when it suited them) and rating points at the price of the American public. The fact that you're defending them speaks volumes about your political lean. Edit to add, forgot the to add credence to my post.Yes, this is very true. - Thank You, for that summation - |
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: That's correct. What the law DOES do though, is prohibit revocation of access because "I don't like what you said." Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Chisum: No law requires the WH to grant access to every news outlet. That's correct. What the law DOES do though, is prohibit revocation of access because "I don't like what you said."
|
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in time when everyone stands around, and wise men are reloading."
-Somebody that's been there.
-Somebody that's been there.
Member
Joined:
Aug 2024
Posts:
2468
EE: 0% (0)
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By dukeofearl: Selectively banning news organizations sends a message to those remaining... say or report something I don't like or disagree with and you might be banned as well.  Anyway, Trump TV promises new groundbreaking broadcasting... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKhMP2r4XGk  |
|
Originally Posted By dukeofearl: Selectively banning news organizations sends a message to those remaining... say or report something I don't like or disagree with and you might be banned as well. Like what has been said over and over again, no one is stopping liberal media from publishing. Obama and Biden come to mind. Just for the record, there is no special 1A just for the news media that says 'libal' needs to be proven more so than for you and me. That was some SCOTUS made up BS that needs to be revisited. |
"Peace is that brief glorious moment in time when everyone stands around, and wise men are reloading."
-Somebody that's been there.
-Somebody that's been there.
|
Attached File
|