Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/5/2004 6:05:02 AM EDT
What are these trucks like? What is the comparison to the S-10,Ranger,Tacoma Etc.I`ve only seen a few on the road but look okay.
6/5/2004 6:11:24 AM EDT
[#1]
Is that the new "mid sized" pickup?
6/5/2004 6:11:44 AM EDT
[#2]
All GM's have crappy HVAC and electrical systems. My niece and I have a game of when we drive around and one of us see's a GM with a daytime running light or a brake light out the first one to see it gets to slug the other one...my arm is bruised all the time.
6/5/2004 6:12:55 AM EDT
[#3]
For the money, you could just buy a full size pickup......
6/5/2004 6:19:10 AM EDT
[#4]
I`d rather drive a car but need an open cargo bed for my business.
6/5/2004 8:44:12 AM EDT
[#5]
I was thinking about a GMC Canyon but after I added up the price for what I wanted and how I was going to use it, I am now leaning towards a Ford Sports Track. The GMC has a little better gas milage but I like the Ford V6 over that inline 5.I look at trucks for a year before I buy so in 2005 I should be getting one but then again it may be 2006 so I can look at the new Honda SUT which will cost more than the ford.But hey as long as my 1996 chey runs with no problems why rush plus I am also plan on paying cash.
6/5/2004 9:48:46 AM EDT
[#6]
Lots of interesting new small/midsize trucks in the pipeline. Dodge is redesigning its Dakota, Mitsubishi will introduce a Dakota-based truck of its own, Nissan will offer a high-horsepower V6 for the Frontier, and Toyota will up the power output of its surpercharged V6. About the only company that isn't doing any major small truck changes is the one that probably needs some changes the worst: Ford...
6/5/2004 9:50:22 AM EDT
[#7]
Buy a japanese truck just to stick it to the unions.
6/5/2004 9:55:29 AM EDT
[#8]
The Fors SPort Trac has no balls at all.  It's a woman car,. to day the least
6/5/2004 9:58:08 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Buy a japanese truck just to stick it to the unions.

                                                                                                                                                                                          The majority of Jap trucks are made in the U.S. nowadays...
6/5/2004 9:58:50 AM EDT
[#10]
When I saw 'em come out I was all geeked about some competition for the Dakota.  'Course then I saw it didn't come with an optional V8 and it had a 5 CYLINDER!  WTF?!  a V5?!  Nope.  Not for me.

Rich
6/5/2004 10:00:01 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Buy a japanese truck just to stick it to the unions.

                                                                                                                                                                                          The majority of Jap trucks are made in the U.S. nowadays...




Are they made by union workers?
6/5/2004 7:46:16 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
When I saw 'em come out I was all geeked about some competition for the Dakota.  'Course then I saw it didn't come with an optional V8 and it had a 5 CYLINDER!  WTF?!  a V5?!  Nope.  Not for me.

Rich



It isn't a V5, but an inline 5.

Engine has a ton of pep, even more than the 4.3L in my Blazer.  Might just be due to the weight difference in the two.

Were I in the market for a new pickup, the Colorado or Canyon would be my first choice.
6/5/2004 8:03:03 PM EDT
[#13]
I just think it looks bad.

Not that I care for trucks much at all.  It just looks bad in the front.
6/5/2004 8:05:20 PM EDT
[#14]
They wanted to style it after the Silverado, which I think they did a decent job of doing.

I love the "angry" headlights.
6/5/2004 8:11:27 PM EDT
[#15]
No. To my knowledge the UAW has yet to be in any Japanese plant in the US.
6/5/2004 8:13:30 PM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
They wanted to style it after the Silverado



...except that they turned the front end upside down (headlights on the bottom, daytime running lights & turn signals on the top). It looks very funky on the road (moreso than in print)...definitely not a truck that I'd be proud to own.

The inline 6-cylinder that the Blazer/Envoy SUVs use is nice, but lopping one or two cylinders off it for the Colorado strikes me as typical GM cheapness. IMO, they still doesn't take small trucks seriously.
6/5/2004 8:30:44 PM EDT
[#17]
Dude, its a chevy. Buy anything else. 5 cylinders???? Does chevy even remember what torque is??? Revving to 4500rpm just to move the truck with relative ease is rather stupid. Look at ANYTHING else.
6/5/2004 8:36:17 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
I just think it looks bad.

Not that I care for trucks much at all.  It just looks bad in the front.





My thoughts as well
6/5/2004 8:42:04 PM EDT
[#19]
I've driven both the Dakota Quad Cab and the four door Colorado...

The Dakota wins hands down for power and fit and finish... 4.7L V8 in Dakota.
6/5/2004 8:46:20 PM EDT
[#20]
The I5 puts out slightly higher hp numbers then the 4.3, but when it comes to torque, the 4.3 cannot be beaten.

260-270 ft/lbs of torque out of a V6?
Those are Torque numbers out of a small V8 usually.
6/5/2004 9:06:55 PM EDT
[#21]
I just bought a Tacoma and love it.  For my needs it has plenty of power and plenty of cargo space.  I gets decent gas mileage and I feel as though I got a pretty good deal on it.  I looked at the Canyon/Colorado trucks and they are just plain ugly.  The front end looks upside down, and quite frankly, I was a little less than impressed with the quality of the fit and finish of the vehicle.  Body and trim panels that just didn't quite line up, loose trim panels on the inside of the doors, and when I test drove it, there were about 30 different rattles and squeaks inside.  I test drove the Tacoma and it was rock solid.  Again, before I get smoked by all the domestic supporters, this is just my experience.  

I'm sure someone will come along and point out just how and why I am wrong.



-REAPER2502
6/5/2004 9:08:26 PM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:
The I5 puts out slightly higher hp numbers then the 4.3, but when it comes to torque, the 4.3 cannot be beaten.

260-270 ft/lbs of torque out of a V6?
Those are Torque numbers out of a small V8 usually.



That is one thing I love about the 4.3 and one reason I was sad to see it go.

6000 lb. towing capacity isn't anything to sneeze at.