[ARCHIVED THREAD] - One step away from child porn . . . (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 2/20/2004 9:28:45 AM EDT
|
A short rant . . . I just received the March 2004 "Blue Press" (Dillion Precision). On the cover there is a provocatively dressed child. Now, there is nothing wrong with provocatively dressed women, but this chick looks like she is 15 years old. There IS SOMETHING WRONG with a senior citizen (Dillon) choosing such a young looking model for the catalog cover. Doesn't he realize that the antigunners can easily spin this, and make us all seem like child-ogling perverts?! If he wants to put some "motivation" on the cover, more power to him, but at least put someone older looking. This crap is sure to backfire at some point . . Just for the record, I've no beef with Dillion as a company, I've probably spent several hundred with them over the years, with no problems. |
|
I agree... what the hell. Gay marriage, child porn, tax-payer supported porn surfing at the library, public sex, beastiality. It all seems to be A-Okay, or soon-to-be sactioned from the state. So who cares? We need to "lighten-up" and be less puritanical and more like Europe. What I find interesting is that so many people who claim it's all going down the tubes quickly because of our legal system and political baggage have failed to see this little indicator of the up&coming SHTF and TEOTWAWKI. If you don't think that the World's soon-to-be extinct moral fabric has any effect on things heading south, then you are mistaken. BTW... I have no problem with ADULTS doing their ADULT things behind their bedroom doors and with consenting and willing parties. I am a guy. Therefore I am HORNY! It's part of my biological makeup. I like the WOMEN in the Blue Press. It's when the words moderation, discernment, and disgression disappear from the picture that things get nuts. |
|
ill post a scan if i get some time in a minute, but this chick definately doesnt look underage. she looks mid 20's at least. hell, she looks a little old for me and im 25. she does not have a "barely legal" look to her in any sense of the term. hell, i'll go out on a limb and say she doesn't look nearly as hot as the other girls in the catalogue. |
|
Quoted: I agree... what the hell. Gay marriage, child porn, tax-payer supported porn surfing at the library, public sex, beastiality. It all seems to be A-Okay, or soon-to-be sactioned from the state. So who cares? We need to "lighten-up" and be less puritanical and more like Europe. What I find interesting is that so many people who claim it's all going down the tubes quickly because of our legal system and political baggage have failed to see this little indicator of the up&coming SHTF and TEOTWAWKI. If you don't think that the World's soon-to-be extinct moral fabric has any effect on things heading south, then you are mistaken. BTW... I have no problem with ADULTS doing their ADULT things behind their bedroom doors and with consenting and willing parties. I am a guy. Therefore I am HORNY! It's part of my biological makeup. I like the WOMEN in the Blue Press. It's when the words moderation, discernment, and disgression disappear from the picture that things get nuts. I nominate you for the best reply of the day award!. SGtar15 |
|
looks like a 25 y/o from eastern europe to me. she's not wearing enough makeup or showing enough skin to be underage... that's the sad part. anyways, if you consider this cild pr0n, you obviously don't get out much these days. by todays standard this would be considered modest wear out to a teeny bopper club. |
|
I will agree colinjay. She doesn't look underage to me. Maybe "barely legal", but not underage. C'mon Dillon, let's see some chicky's with some more womanly curves once in a while. I am a MAN and I WANT A WOMAN... not a girl. Little girlz are for little boyz. Thanks sgtar15! |
|
Quoted: A short rant . . . I just received the March 2004 "Blue Press" (Dillion Precision). On the cover there is a provocatively dressed child. Now, there is nothing wrong with provocatively dressed women, but this chick looks like she is 15 years old. There IS SOMETHING WRONG with a senior citizen (Dillon) choosing such a young looking model for the catalog cover. Doesn't he realize that the antigunners can easily spin this, and make us all seem like child-ogling perverts?! If he wants to put some "motivation" on the cover, more power to him, but at least put someone older looking. This crap is sure to backfire at some point . . Just for the record, I've no beef with Dillion as a company, I've probably spent several hundred with them over the years, with no problems. The fact that you look at that pic and see child porn speaks volumes... |
| I will be 20 in a month. I can judge with out any doubt that she is around mid-twenties. Some of you old cantankerous goats might mistake her for being a teen, but fercryinoutloud, polish up those bifocals and quit your bitching already. Isn't there a golf game on TV? Or snotty neighbor kids to chase off your lawn? SHe most definitely isn't a teen. |
|
Quoted: I will be 20 in a month. I can judge with out any doubt that she is around mid-twenties. Some of you old cantankerous goats might mistake her for being a teen, but fercryinoutloud, polish up those bifocals and quit your bitching already. Isn't there a golf game on TV? Or snotty neighbor kids to chase off your lawn? SHe most definitely isn't a teen. [lolabove] When I was in my teens I could nail a woman's age within 8 or 9 months from zero to her thirties. Now that I'm an old cantankerous goat I can't tell a girl's age within five years let alone a woman's. I can tell under 12 pretty good but between 13 and 23 ... I'd have to check ID first. |
|
heres my current (circa 2002) rule for evaluating a womans age from 14-30. 14-22ish wears too much makeup and not enough clothes. 23-25 wears enough conservative clothes and little "natural" or no makeup (or at least no base or foundation) 26-30 doesn't wear enough makeup and dresses like a 14-22 year old trying to remember the days when her clotes were "stretch" and not "stretch[b]ed[/b]" and when her boobs actually fit in a tube top. either that or they dress like a schoolmarm in her 40's. they are the easiest to spot. as a rule of thumb from 14-30 the oldest "appearing" females in terms of makeup are the youngest. the ones who you think might look a little better with some more makeup/clothes are going to be the oldest. chicks like the one in the pic fit in the "natural" look bordering on too much makeup. (probably for the shoot) that's why id date her in the early to mid 20's |
| Any man that thinks that the cover girl is a "child"better work on cleaning his glasses or open up a Playboy. She is hot and looks about 23-26 to me.Although I am old enough to be her daddy...I'm not,and mid twenties is old enough for cheap meaningless sex. Wonder if she has any piercings? |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: brb on the nipple edit. Edit her right hand and everything will be within code. I also ask that all images and videos posted on this site be within full compliance of 18 U.S.C. Section 2257. eh? right hand? Yes. Her hand is suggestively caressing the scope, which is unquestionably being used as a phallic symbol in the pic. I am just trying to help bring peace. |