Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 626
Next Page
9/14/2026 12:54:01 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Chokey][Edited] [#1]
another video of the construction off of Hwy 4
9/14/2026 1:09:54 PM EDT
[#2]
and more
New SpaceX 444 Acre Site Drone Footage
9/14/2026 3:13:56 PM EDT
[#3]
What is that? Parking for starship?
Ego is the anesthesia that deadens stupidity.

"To every man upon this earth Death cometh soon or late. And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his Gods."
9/14/2026 4:47:49 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Originally Posted By shooter_gregg:
What is that? Parking for starship?
View Quote
They haven't said yet but that seems unlikely as a sole purpose, could be multi use area.

I'd speculate power generation.  They need more power before they can really fully utilize the Air Separation Unit that is nearing completion across Hwy 4 from Pad 1 to produce their own O2 and N2 for the tank farm.

A new 24" gas pipeline will go in supply this site, that is a MASSIVE supply of gas so assume gas turbines/generators

Data center while possible, just doesn't make much since.  

A liquefaction plant to make CH4 on this site seems a little unlikely.  It would require a highly insulated pipeline from this site all the way to the tank farm at the launch site.

It is on the Port Connector Road, which is the closest access to the port from Starbase.  About 12 miles down Hwy4.

This dirt work in the videos is along the west side of the port connector road is shaded on the left below.

They are also starting dirt work on that smaller strip between the port connector and Massey's test site and that is rumored to extend all the way north to the port as well.

Overall view of those 2 sites.



9/15/2026 11:27:12 AM EDT
[#5]
it's just passing Cape Town now.

9/15/2026 11:36:32 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Hadrian][Edited] [#6]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Chokey:
it's just passing Cape Town now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSPtPooX0AAOsZ_.jpg?name=orig
View Quote
Cool.  I was wondering about that this morning.

On a separate note, I was looking back at the beginning of this thread.  Chokey, I saw your post on page 1 - you've consistently kept us updated for nearly 8 years.

Thank you.  
9/15/2026 12:22:32 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Chokey:
it's just passing Cape Town now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSPtPooX0AAOsZ_.jpg?name=orig
View Quote

I don't see no Americans. I see trespassers.
9/15/2026 2:01:06 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Gamma762][Edited] [#8]


Starship is preparing to go to orbit. Flight 14 is targeting to launch as early as Tuesday, September 22, pending regulatory approval



SpaceX has just officially announced that they are targeting Tuesday, September 22nd at 8:15 AM ET for their 14th Starship test flight.

The upcoming flight is planned to be the first to send Starship into orbit around Earth, and will also mark the first time SplaceX plans to deploy Starlink V3 satellites into the constellation, delivering a payload that will dramatically expand connectivity speeds and reliability around the world.

Starship’s initial orbital mission is expected to fly at an altitude approximately 275 km above Earth and complete approximately six orbits around the planet over the course of a nearly 10-hour flight, with splashdown targeted in the Pacific Ocean to the west of Chile.

The booster’s primary test objective on Flight 14 will be executing a successful launch, ascent, stage separation, boostback burn, and landing burn at an offshore landing point in the Gulf of America. There have been several modifications to hardware and software to address issues seen on the previous flight.



SpaceX says they've made several upgrades to Starship's heatshield for test flight 14:

The upgrades include additional retention mechanisms added to tiles in areas deemed to be at highest risk of falling off during ascent, addressing recently discovered areas that offer flow paths behind tiles for plasma, and flying multiple areas with a curved tile design that has shown the ability to reduce heating in the gaps between tiles. Lastly, two tiles recovered from Ship 40 are planned to be reflown on Ship 41, marking the first tile reuse for Starship
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
9/15/2026 2:58:33 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cobalt135][Edited] [#9]
Official Flight 14 page.  https://www.spacex.com/launches/starship-flight-14

Flight 13 info and corrective actions for booster performance:

There have been several modifications to hardware and software to address issues seen on the previous flight.  After stage separation and flip on Flight 13, the Super Heavy booster was able to use all 33 engines on its boostback burn for the first time. In the terminal phase of the burn, the three center engines showed signs of ice clogging which triggered an early end to the maneuver. The booster went on to attempt a landing burn, with 8 of the 13 planned engines reigniting before the booster made a hard splashdown in the Gulf.

The Super Heavy on this upcoming flight has hardware modifications to improve filtering to the engines and software changes to enhance relight reliability.
View Quote
00:00:00 - Liftoff
00:00:58 - Max Q (moment of peak aerodynamic stress on the rocket)
00:02:20 - Super Heavy MECO (most engines cut off)
00:02:22 - Hot-staging (Starship Raptor ignition and stage separation)
00:02:27 - Super Heavy boostback burn start
00:03:07 - Super Heavy boostback burn shutdown
00:06:35 - Super Heavy landing burn start
00:07:01 - Super Heavy landing burn shutdown
00:08:11 - Starship engine cutoff
00:25:28 - Starship orbital insertion burn start
00:25:47 - Starship orbital insertion burn shutdown
00:34:18 - Payload deploy start
01:04:50 - Payload deploy complete
08:52:18 - Deorbit burn start
08:52:29 - Deorbit burn shutdown
09:28:52 - Starship entry
09:47:30 - Starship is transonic
09:48:07 - Starship is subsonic
09:50:11 - Landing burn start
09:50:13 - Landing flip
09:50:21 - Landing burn 3 to 2 engines
09:50:22 - Landing burn 2 to 1 engine
09:50:30 - An exciting landing!







Initial orbit design


9/15/2026 3:59:52 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cobalt135:
Official Flight 14 page.  https://www.spacex.com/launches/starship-flight-14

Flight 13 info and corrective actions for booster performance:

00:00:00 - Liftoff
00:00:58 - Max Q (moment of peak aerodynamic stress on the rocket)
00:02:20 - Super Heavy MECO (most engines cut off)
00:02:22 - Hot-staging (Starship Raptor ignition and stage separation)
00:02:27 - Super Heavy boostback burn start
00:03:07 - Super Heavy boostback burn shutdown
00:06:35 - Super Heavy landing burn start
00:07:01 - Super Heavy landing burn shutdown
00:08:11 - Starship engine cutoff
00:25:28 - Starship orbital insertion burn start
00:25:47 - Starship orbital insertion burn shutdown
00:34:18 - Payload deploy start
01:04:50 - Payload deploy complete
08:52:18 - Deorbit burn start
08:52:29 - Deorbit burn shutdown
09:28:52 - Starship entry
09:47:30 - Starship is transonic
09:48:07 - Starship is subsonic
09:50:11 - Landing burn start
09:50:13 - Landing flip
09:50:21 - Landing burn 3 to 2 engines
09:50:22 - Landing burn 2 to 1 engine
09:50:30 - An exciting landing!


https://sxcontent9668.azureedge.us/cms-assets/assets/Test_Flight_14_Trajectory_090226_web_2_56b3b513b2.png




Initial orbit design

https://sxcontent9668.azureedge.us/cms-assets/assets/Orbital_Aborts_V3_3ae6b3cda5.png
View Quote
9/15/2026 4:06:49 PM EDT
[#11]
1st Re-entry NOTAM issued:



9/15/2026 4:23:50 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cobalt135:
1st Re-entry NOTAM issued:



https://i.imgur.com/3Kk3TGY.jpeg
View Quote


I'm guessing this means no catch attempt
Remorse is for the dead
9/15/2026 4:55:59 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Hadrian:
Cool.  I was wondering about that this morning.

On a separate note, I was looking back at the beginning of this thread.  Chokey, I saw your post on page 1 - you've consistently kept us updated for nearly 8 years.

Thank you.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Hadrian:
Originally Posted By Chokey:
it's just passing Cape Town now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSPtPooX0AAOsZ_.jpg?name=orig
Cool.  I was wondering about that this morning.

On a separate note, I was looking back at the beginning of this thread.  Chokey, I saw your post on page 1 - you've consistently kept us updated for nearly 8 years.

Thank you.  
indeed
Tom Sawyer.

"If The Rules brought us to this, what use are they?"
9/15/2026 5:27:16 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cobalt135:
1st Re-entry NOTAM issued:



https://i.imgur.com/3Kk3TGY.jpeg
View Quote


Easter Island was a Space Shuttle contingency landing site... NASA lengthened the airport runway to 11,000+ ft.
Scepticism is an exercise, not a life; it is a discipline fit to purify the mind of prejudice and render it all the more apt, when the time comes, to believe and to act wisely. -- George Santayana

Never mistake a clear view for a short distance.
9/15/2026 5:34:21 PM EDT
[#15]
More splashdowns.  Have they given up on recovery/reuse?
Texas -
Bigger than France.

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
--RWR, 1964
9/15/2026 5:47:44 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Originally Posted By vmpglenn:


Easter Island was a Space Shuttle contingency landing site... NASA lengthened the airport runway to 11,000+ ft.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By vmpglenn:
Originally Posted By Cobalt135:
1st Re-entry NOTAM issued:



https://i.imgur.com/3Kk3TGY.jpeg


Easter Island was a Space Shuttle contingency landing site... NASA lengthened the airport runway to 11,000+ ft.

Yes, it would have been the TAL (Transoceanic Abort Landing) for polar orbit Shuttle launches from Vandenberg.

Since Vandenberg launches were cancelled these were the only TAL made fully mission ready.


9/15/2026 5:54:55 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Gloftoe:
More splashdowns.  Have they given up on recovery/reuse?
View Quote
This is only the 3rd flight of the V3 vehicle and engines, they have a few issues to work out with booster, and they want to prove out that Starship can spend more than 40 some minutes in space and still have properly functioning hardware.  Batteries, actuators, ice issues?, valving, and Raptor relight after the extended orbits.


9/15/2026 5:57:47 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Hesperus][Edited] [#18]
There’s a novel I haven’t read about a Shuttle launch out of Vandenberg diverting to Easter Island. Then for stakes, the Soviets try to steal it.

It had some pretty amusing cover art.

Attached File


That’s either some big assed Moai or a teeny X-37 sized Orbiter.

If it wasn’t for the lack of infrastructure I suppose Easter Island would make a good launch site. Kwajalein Atoll probably males more sense though.
Exaggerate the essential, leave the obvious vague.
9/15/2026 6:18:59 PM EDT
[#19]
I thought this flight was supposed to catch the ship after orbit. Is that not the current case? I went to the official page and it looks to be a splashdown for the booster and the starship.

8654
9/15/2026 6:47:55 PM EDT
[Last Edit: DK-Prof][Edited] [#20]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Gloftoe:
More splashdowns.  Have they given up on recovery/reuse?
View Quote


It wasn't until Flight 20 of Falcon 9 that they had a successful booster recovery/landing.

The entire point of Starship is reuse.  If they had given up on recovery/reuse, they probably wouldn't bother to ever launch the system again.


That said, I am as bummed as you are they they are not going to try to catch Starship on the next flight.  I guess they just want to be extra-sure, since it is such an unprecedented thing.
“A real man does not think of victory or defeat. He plunges recklessly towards an irrational death. By doing this, you will awaken from your dreams.” -- Tsunetomo Yamamoto
9/15/2026 6:53:33 PM EDT
[#21]
When you’re talking about a stainless steel object the size of a 15 story building that can travel at over 20 times the speed of sound, being extra careful seems wise.
Exaggerate the essential, leave the obvious vague.
9/15/2026 6:55:52 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Hesperus:
When you're talking about a stainless steel object the size of a 15 story building that can travel at over 20 times the speed of sound, being extra careful seems wise.
View Quote
Meh. Send it. What's the worst thing that could happen?
Life is about choices.
If you make a mistake once, it's a mistake.
You make the same mistake again, that's a choice.
9/15/2026 7:48:52 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cobalt135][Edited] [#23]
Ship 41 will go from the largest single item ever launched into space, to the largest single item to be placed into orbit around earth.

Below image is the path of Ship 41 orbits for this launch.  The Ship goes initially into a suborbital trajectory just like always had.  If there is a problem then it will fall into the Indian Ocean without any assistance.

If OK, the orbit insertion burn will occur.  At that point, it could come down anywhere between the Northern and Southern latitudes of the orbit.  It would be a huge deal if they lost control and it re-entered in an unplanned manner, even bigger if it hits land.

SpaceX have to be satisfied with the predicted performance to send it on a re-entry over the southern US for a landing at Starbase without tons of parts raining down on people.

The FAA has to be satisfied with what they are seeing, and how SpaceX has handled corrective actions before they will grant a launch license to even do such a thing. <---I think this is part of the holdup, in addition to the following:

Pad 2 is the only functioning launch pad.  Pad 1 is a few months from being finished with the refit.  If the booster or ship have a failure in the final stages of the catch you are gonna trash the launch mount and tower.    That could be months of repairs.

B-22 and S-42 could easily be ready for Flight 15 in November.  




9/16/2026 12:14:15 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote History
Originally Posted By redoubt:
Meh. Send it. What's the worst thing that could happen?
View Quote


post_count += 1
PGP: 912E3E9A194DED4E47DA0BA9D593AD70C8C12B9C
9/16/2026 3:34:17 AM EDT
[#25]


Starship Flight 14:

-Morning launch (75 min. window opens at 7:15am CT)

-Will be the first Starship launch to go orbital!

-No booster or ship catch.

-Ship will orbit the Earth about 6 times over the course of nearly 10 hours!

-Ship will splashdown off coast of Chile in the Pacific Ocean, not the Indian Ocean

-Starship will deploy 26 Starlink V3 satellites that will be operational
This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
9/16/2026 7:45:42 AM EDT
[#26]
So, Ship 41 will be floated back through the Panama Canal?  
9/16/2026 12:41:40 PM EDT
[#27]
While catching both would be nice, I wonder if they're waiting for the second tower to be farther along until they go for a full catch. Having your only launch and retrieval platform nuked by your system coming in to hot would be a delay while they repair/rebuild it
9/16/2026 1:01:40 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Hadrian:
So, Ship 41 will be floated back through the Panama Canal?  
View Quote


They are going to be flying over Beijing while blasting Panama.  
9/16/2026 1:57:17 PM EDT
[#29]
Local Notice to Mariners is up.



NAVAREA IV / Space Operations / Hazardous Warning Area / Commercial (Hazardous)
  • Navigation hazards within the hazard areas may include free falling debris and / or descending vehicles or vehicle components under various means of control.
  • Free falling rocket launching components will land within the high risk hazard area.
View Quote


9/16/2026 6:05:15 PM EDT
[#30]
New video, not sure how to embed it.

https://www.spacex.com/content/starship/holy-grail-of-rocketry
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: 'In God is our trust.'
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
9/16/2026 6:52:41 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote History
Originally Posted By 7:
New video, not sure how to embed it.

https://www.spacex.com/content/starship/holy-grail-of-rocketry
View Quote


I love SpaceX films.
Seriously... unTex the Mex..
9/16/2026 7:04:11 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cobalt135][Edited] [#32]
New, video 3








Starship - The Holy Grail of Rocketry

9/16/2026 7:13:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: RarestRX][Edited] [#33]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cobalt135:
New, video 3






For the YT people (this link could break since it is someone posting a ripped version from X.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQCtXRtRuBc
View Quote


I'm not gonna lie, the space footage with that music gets me hard.



The long term future is a mash up of Idiocracy and 1984. "Ow, my balls" meets "He loved Big Brother". The boot on your face will likely be a big red clown shoe, but it'll be there regardless. - pmacb
9/16/2026 9:17:58 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Hadrian][Edited] [#34]
Quote History
Originally Posted By 7:
New video, not sure how to embed it.

https://www.spacex.com/content/starship/holy-grail-of-rocketry
View Quote
For anybody at all interested in the recovery of Ship 40, this is a must watch.  
9/16/2026 11:12:03 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cobalt135][Edited] [#35]
The primary issue with the booster is ice clogging the LOX feedlines to the engines during boostback and landing burns causing engines failing to light due to supply issues.  This is due to tapping off some of the hot gasses from the Raptor combustion to maintain positive pressurization within the propellant  tank.  They chose this route to reduce weight of carrying COPV tanks to keep positive pressure on the propellant tank as it is depleted during the launch.

If B-21 overcomes the internal LOX tank icing issues and clogging of the feed lines caused by the high temp autogenous gas pressurization of the tank by the Raptor combustion byproducts, CO2 and H2O, reacting to the the -290 degree LOX supply, then it can move on to catch attempt possibilities in the future.

The main corrective action has been to install strainers in the LOX tank to keep that ice formation from blocking the propellant flow the engines need to perform successful boostback and landing burns.

Until they can be confident that they have that issue under control there is no expectation that the booster will return for a catch.

On this launch, the ship will demonstrate the ability to remain in an actual orbit for an extended time period (nearly 10 hours vs under 2 hours so far) and can still perform a successful deorbit burn and splash down where they intended. (off the coast of Chile)

That should give the FAA the confidence to allow catch attempts of ships back at Starbase.

9/17/2026 12:17:21 PM EDT
[#36]
AI answer to "How much to the Starship tiles weigh? I got to handle a Shuttle tile once; it looked like a heavy ceramic block, about 8 x 12 x 1 inches, but it weighed about as much as a styrofoam cup!

At 20:21 of the above video he's handling one of these tiles.


An individual, standard intact Starship thermal protection system (TPS) tile weighs roughly 381 grams (about 13.5 ounces or 0.84 pounds). Because the hexagonal tiles (often called "star bricks") vary slightly in thickness and size depending on their placement on the vehicle's body—such as the nose cone or the flaps—their weights can vary, with some custom sections weighing up to 0.55 kg.Total Shield WeightWhen calculating the weight of the entire heat shield, the numbers scale up quickly:The Tiles Alone: A standard Starship is covered in approximately 18,000 hexagonal ceramic tiles. If every tile weighed exactly the baseline 381 grams, the total tile mass would be around 6.8 metric tons (approx. 15,000 lbs).The Entire System: The tiles do not sit directly on the steel hull. When you include the weight of the underlying flexible ceramic fiber insulation blankets, mounting clips, and thousands of stainless steel attachment pins welded to the ship, the entire thermal protection system is estimated to weigh between 5 to 10 metric tons.Because Starship is constructed from stainless steel, it can tolerate much higher temperatures (up to 800°C–1000°C) than the aluminum structure of the old Space Shuttle. This allows SpaceX to use thinner, lighter insulation layers overall, making Starship's total heat shield weight roughly 30% lighter per square foot compared to legacy spacecraft.
87% of the time, any question starting with "Why..." is answered with "Money."

“Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.”--Marcus Aurelius

"...and if you can't wait for dawn you can always light a fire."
9/17/2026 1:20:38 PM EDT
[#37]
9/17/2026 1:25:06 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cobalt135:
The primary issue with the booster is ice clogging the LOX feedlines to the engines during boostback and landing burns causing engines failing to light due to supply issues.  This is due to tapping off some of the hot gasses from the Raptor combustion to maintain positive pressurization within the propellant  tank.  They chose this route to reduce weight of carrying COPV tanks to keep positive pressure on the propellant tank as it is depleted during the launch.

If B-21 overcomes the internal LOX tank icing issues and clogging of the feed lines caused by the high temp autogenous gas pressurization of the tank by the Raptor combustion byproducts, CO2 and H2O, reacting to the the -290 degree LOX supply, then it can move on to catch attempt possibilities in the future.

The main corrective action has been to install strainers in the LOX tank to keep that ice formation from blocking the propellant flow the engines need to perform successful boostback and landing burns.

Until they can be confident that they have that issue under control there is no expectation that the booster will return for a catch.

On this launch, the ship will demonstrate the ability to remain in an actual orbit for an extended time period (nearly 10 hours vs under 2 hours so far) and can still perform a successful deorbit burn and splash down where they intended. (off the coast of Chile)

That should give the FAA the confidence to allow catch attempts of ships back at Starbase.

View Quote


I wonder if they could have microwave heaters to melt the ice at the pick-ups?
Preferred Pronoun: Space Lord Mutherfucker
9/17/2026 1:59:13 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote History
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:


I wonder if they could have microwave heaters to melt the ice at the pick-ups?
View Quote



It seems stupid to me that they would elect to dump exhaust gas back into the LOX tank for pad pressure. Why not just vaporize a slip stream of LOX instead? The current method is not for "rapid reuse" because you'd have continual ice/CO2 build up in the LOX tanks. Seems like a shortcut that has too many obstacles.

-ZA

derp...
9/17/2026 2:02:04 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote History
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:


I wonder if they could have microwave heaters to melt the ice at the pick-ups?
View Quote


I'm no rocket scientist, but when we wanted to keep our plumbing from freezing in the winter at the ranch we just let the tap drip a bit.

so why not a return line/pump with a check valve to keep the fluid circulating back to the tank?
9/17/2026 2:07:58 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote History
Originally Posted By HeavyMetal:


I wonder if they could have microwave heaters to melt the ice at the pick-ups?
View Quote
they had heat exchangers on Raptor 1 but not 2 or 3.  2 and 3 are the ones with the ice issues.
Coyote with 40 people crammed into a minivan gets into a chase with DPS, Paco over estimates his driving abilities and *whmmo!* the Astrovan of Immigration becomes a Pinata of Pain, hurling broken bodies like so many tasty pieces of cheap candy...
9/17/2026 2:10:07 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote History
Originally Posted By AgeOne:


I'm no rocket scientist, but when we wanted to keep our plumbing from freezing in the winter at the ranch we just let the tap drip a bit.

so why not a return line/pump with a check valve to keep the fluid circulating back to the tank?
View Quote
They are using a tap off from the pre-burners (iirc) to pressurize the tanks. One of the byproducts is water which condenses in the prop tanks and then freezes into ice.

Its rather annoying that they are having this issue again.
Coyote with 40 people crammed into a minivan gets into a chase with DPS, Paco over estimates his driving abilities and *whmmo!* the Astrovan of Immigration becomes a Pinata of Pain, hurling broken bodies like so many tasty pieces of cheap candy...
9/17/2026 3:11:55 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote History
Originally Posted By ZA206:



It seems stupid to me that they would elect to dump exhaust gas back into the LOX tank for pad pressure. Why not just vaporize a slip stream of LOX instead? The current method is not for "rapid reuse" because you'd have continual ice/CO2 build up in the LOX tanks. Seems like a shortcut that has too many obstacles.

-ZA

View Quote
I was wondering about dumping exhaust gases into the lox tank at all.  Seems like that's a big kaboom waiting to happen.  Should something in the system start leaking methane into the exhaust gases and now you're pumping fuel into the oxidized tank.
9/17/2026 3:14:30 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cypher15:
They are using a tap off from the pre-burners (iirc) to pressurize the tanks. One of the byproducts is water which condenses in the prop tanks and then freezes into ice.

Its rather annoying that they are having this issue again.
View Quote
I thought the ice issue was that they are building dry ice - CO2 is also an exhaust product which is getting pumped into the lox tank which is cold enough to create dry ice.
9/17/2026 3:17:14 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote History
Originally Posted By johnh57:
I thought the ice issue was that they are building dry ice - CO2 is also an exhaust product which is getting pumped into the lox tank which is cold enough to create dry ice.
View Quote

Theres water, CO2, CO, and NOx.  So probably both dry ice and water ice.
Coyote with 40 people crammed into a minivan gets into a chase with DPS, Paco over estimates his driving abilities and *whmmo!* the Astrovan of Immigration becomes a Pinata of Pain, hurling broken bodies like so many tasty pieces of cheap candy...
9/17/2026 4:24:39 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote History
Originally Posted By AgeOne:


I'm no rocket scientist, but when we wanted to keep our plumbing from freezing in the winter at the ranch we just let the tap drip a bit.

so why not a return line/pump with a check valve to keep the fluid circulating back to the tank?
View Quote


It's not that the LOX is freezing, it's that the combustion products used to pressurize the tank includes water vapor, which freezes at temps much higher than the OX L's at. Its water ice that's blocking the pipes.

At least, that's how I understand the issue.
9/17/2026 4:27:13 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote History
Originally Posted By tortilla-flats:
indeed
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By tortilla-flats:
Originally Posted By Hadrian:
Originally Posted By Chokey:
it's just passing Cape Town now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSPtPooX0AAOsZ_.jpg?name=orig
Cool.  I was wondering about that this morning.

On a separate note, I was looking back at the beginning of this thread.  Chokey, I saw your post on page 1 - you've consistently kept us updated for nearly 8 years.

Thank you.  
indeed

Hadn't seen these videos before:



This is...a clue - Pat_Rogers
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
9/17/2026 5:03:21 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Cobalt135][Edited] [#48]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Gamma762:

Hadn't seen these videos before:



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Gamma762:
Originally Posted By tortilla-flats:
Originally Posted By Hadrian:
Originally Posted By Chokey:
it's just passing Cape Town now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSPtPooX0AAOsZ_.jpg?name=orig
Cool.  I was wondering about that this morning.

On a separate note, I was looking back at the beginning of this thread.  Chokey, I saw your post on page 1 - you've consistently kept us updated for nearly 8 years.

Thank you.  
indeed

Hadn't seen these videos before:





Those are from SpaceX's Part 3 of the Starship series posted yesterday evening.


Starship - The Holy Grail of Rocketry

9/17/2026 6:36:46 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Gamma762:

Hadn't seen these videos before:



View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Originally Posted By Gamma762:
Originally Posted By tortilla-flats:
Originally Posted By Hadrian:
Originally Posted By Chokey:
it's just passing Cape Town now.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSPtPooX0AAOsZ_.jpg?name=orig
Cool.  I was wondering about that this morning.

On a separate note, I was looking back at the beginning of this thread.  Chokey, I saw your post on page 1 - you've consistently kept us updated for nearly 8 years.

Thank you.  
indeed

Hadn't seen these videos before:






"Sixteen to eighteen foot waves with 45 knot winds*..." It's hard to work with ANY inclement weather but with waves like he's talking about it's damned dangerous.
*45 knots is 51 mph. ON a wet, slippery deck.
87% of the time, any question starting with "Why..." is answered with "Money."

“Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.”--Marcus Aurelius

"...and if you can't wait for dawn you can always light a fire."
9/18/2026 12:11:47 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote History
Originally Posted By Cypher15:

Theres water, CO2, CO, and NOx.  So probably both dry ice and water ice.
View Quote
I expect so.  Dry ice is denser than LOX so it would tend to sink, water ice is less dense than lox so it would float.

Sign up to continue the discussion

Create a free account to share your thoughts, follow topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.

Already a member? Sign In

Previous Page
/ 626
Next Page