Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/19/2017 11:24:26 PM EDT
I'm trying to help a friend solve this, and I think it's horribly written, but maybe I'm missing something obvious.  The irony is I work in a math heavy field.

The given information:

Your team's slot utilization has decreased from 85 to 82 percent.  You will have 1000 appointments this month.  If you stay at 82 percent:

1.  How many patients will not be served that would have otherwise?  This one is simple, it's 180 right?

2.  How many hours per provider per workday do these extra blocks represent? Is the wording for this question not ridiculous?

Info given:

Slot utilization = total number of slots available to patients
Blocks = visit slots
Total slots in schedule = 16

It just seems really odd, the way the second question is worded.  How many hours do these EXTRA blocks represent?  What extra?  The extras not used because of the 3 percent drop in utilization?  Argh!
6/19/2017 11:26:03 PM EDT
[#1]
87. 
6/19/2017 11:26:30 PM EDT
[#2]
I would think the answer to the first is 30, since the baseline was 85% and not 100%.

I have no idea what language the second question is written in.
6/19/2017 11:28:08 PM EDT
[#3]
Yea, some ambiguity there. Fail on whoever came up with that.
6/19/2017 11:28:20 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Quoted:
I would think the answer to the first is 30, since the baseline was 85% and not 100%.

I have no idea what language the second question is written in.
View Quote
No shit, right?  That's literally how it's worded.  It makes no sense from any perspective I can think of.  It's driving me nuts.
6/19/2017 11:28:29 PM EDT
[#5]
This shit is Chinese to me, but I would have thought the answer to question 1 was 30. The number of patients not served increased from 150 to 180.
6/19/2017 11:31:50 PM EDT
[#6]
6/19/2017 11:37:25 PM EDT
[#7]
I'm pretty sure the answer to both is repeal ObamaCare.
6/19/2017 11:40:28 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:
I would think the answer to the first is 30, since the baseline was 85% and not 100%.

I have no idea what language the second question is written in.
View Quote
Yup, your team went from 850 to 820 patients.
6/19/2017 11:41:14 PM EDT
[#9]
35 for q1

Need more info for q2.

How many work days in a month?
How many ppl on your team?
6/19/2017 11:47:43 PM EDT
[#10]
I got 180.......150 + new 30

Question 2 is unanswerable:  The #providers in your team is not given........Is it 5, 10, 20 ?
6/19/2017 11:48:23 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
35 for q1

Need more info for q2.

How many work days in a month?
How many ppl on your team?
View Quote
Exactly.  The only thing I could think of is that there can't possibly be enough information.

Thanks everyone for confirming.

And thanks for the help on number 1...I thought maybe from the way the question was worded they were asking for a baseline of 100 percent to 82.
6/20/2017 12:15:51 AM EDT
[#12]
If you have 1,000 appointments at the 82% utilization level, that means your maximum utilization level would be just over 1,219.5 appointments in a month (1,219 in reality since you can't see half a patient). At 16 appointment slots per day this would mean you will be seeing 62.5 (62 actual) patients per day.

The 85% utilization level would mean you are able to see 1036.5 patients per month, for a practical difference of 36. 16 appointments per day at this level would enable you to see 64.78 (64 actual) patients per day.

The other posters are right when they say there isn't enough information to answer Q2, but that difference of two patients per day would be able to help you solve the answer if you knew how many providers there were, and how long they spend with each patient.

The part of the question that claims there is "extra" time seems to be referring to the amount of time the provider will have outside of seeing a patient, assuming that 100% utilization means that they are with patients every minute of their workday. This is consistent with medical billing practices in that providers are expected to spend a certain amount of time with a patient, and another amount of time on documentation and related tasks. Thus, a drop in time with patients would necessarily lead to an increase in other available time; an "extra" even though the total time in a day remains unchanged.
6/20/2017 12:20:45 AM EDT
[#13]
I can see where you get the 180, but from the crappy wording it could also be 30.  I have no idea about the hours, because the question doesn't define what hours mean in this context. There's gotta be information available that isn't being given to us.
6/20/2017 12:21:22 AM EDT
[#14]
3% of 1000 is 30.
6/20/2017 12:25:11 AM EDT
[#15]
I think I misread the question (surprise, right?)  Total appointments is 1000. That's not slots, that's actual appointments.  If you are getting 82% slot utilization, you would have a total of 1219.51 slots available.  Why in the hell would they give you 0.51 of a slot?  So that can't be right either.   I give up.
6/20/2017 12:26:36 AM EDT
[#16]
Express the unknown variables for question 2 in an equation with known constants.  The equation is your answer.
6/20/2017 12:27:56 AM EDT
[#17]
This bullshit is why healthcare is so expensive, FYI.

"Managers" managing Physician schedules.
6/20/2017 1:02:50 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote History
Quoted:
This bullshit is why healthcare is so expensive, FYI.

"Managers" managing Physician schedules.
View Quote
Correct.  And yup, I was trying to help a friend answer this question for an officer manager position interview for a doctor's office.

That is literally all the information given for that, I looked over the sheet more than once seeing if something else was given.
6/20/2017 1:04:09 AM EDT
[#19]
196 is a VERY interesting number, probably not your answer, worth the research tho.
6/20/2017 1:17:03 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Quoted:
If you have 1,000 appointments at the 82% utilization level, that means your maximum utilization level would be just over 1,219.5 appointments in a month (1,219 in reality since you can't see half a patient). At 16 appointment slots per day this would mean you will be seeing 62.5 (62 actual) patients per day.

The 85% utilization level would mean you are able to see 1036.5 patients per month, for a practical difference of 36. 16 appointments per day at this level would enable you to see 64.78 (64 actual) patients per day.

The other posters are right when they say there isn't enough information to answer Q2, but that difference of two patients per day would be able to help you solve the answer if you knew how many providers there were, and how long they spend with each patient.

The part of the question that claims there is "extra" time seems to be referring to the amount of time the provider will have outside of seeing a patient, assuming that 100% utilization means that they are with patients every minute of their workday. This is consistent with medical billing practices in that providers are expected to spend a certain amount of time with a patient, and another amount of time on documentation and related tasks. Thus, a drop in time with patients would necessarily lead to an increase in other available time; an "extra" even though the total time in a day remains unchanged.
View Quote
What he said.