[ARCHIVED THREAD] - How much longer before UBC? (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 6/11/2017 11:03:03 PM EDT
With more and more of these cock suckers and all the fudds jumping on board with them, I don't think it'll be long before all the mindless zombies out there push harder for it. |
|
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/VrCmlFu.jpg With more and more of these cock suckers and all the fudds jumping on board with them, I don't think it'll be long before all the mindless zombies out there push harder for it. OP should check out the latest Presidential Election. The tl,dr is good news. Might also check out the latest SCOTUS appointment. More good news. Nation wide UBCs were dead in the water with Obummer in the White House. Getting a grasp on real Nation Wide issues is not hard OP. Just Sayin. 
|
| Ubc is one of the most dangerous concepts to the 2A. Ignoring the common sense issues such as letting your buddy use your shotgun to go dove hunting, It's inherently unenforceable without registration. Registration leads to confinscation, which is the real goal. Ubc is nothing but a long game scheme to confinscate guns. |
|
Just the look on his face, the arbitrary way he is holding the rifles... that in and of itself shows the absolute contempt "they" have for gun owners.
We are archaic and backwards to them, uncivilized and.... well deplorable. There is no winning that over, no reasoning with that level of contempt; we are at war with the left and they want nothing less than Australian style gun control. |
|
Quoted:
My bad- he's in favor of waiting periods. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.  I'm pretty sure I know who it is. |
|
Quoted:
OP should check out the latest Presidential Election. The tl,dr is good news. Might also check out the latest SCOTUS appointment. More good news. Nation wide UBCs were dead in the water with Obummer in the White House. Getting a grasp on real Nation Wide issues is not hard OP. Just Sayin. On the bright side, I'm quite certain that they can expand state bans on private sales all they like, and hardly anyone is going to give a shit. |
|
Quoted:
No mill needed just a drill and router https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/20856/IMG-0756-132971.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/20856/lowers-144962.jpg https://amodestpublication.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/ |
|
Quoted:
My bad- he's in favor of waiting periods. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea. |
|
can't be enforced, can't be done.
there are millions of guns out there that have changed hands many times since originally purchased. they cannot be tracked. unless ALL firearms are registered, it is a pipe dream. and Nobody is going to register all their guns. won't got through anywhere. |
|
Quoted:
Staff or a mod? Who is this mystery person? Do you have a link supporting that claim? I don't recall ever seeing site staff in favor or waiting periods either. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea. 
Edit: @brich2929 |
|
Quoted:
Just the look on his face, the arbitrary way he is holding the rifles... that in and of itself shows the absolute contempt "they" have for gun owners. We are archaic and backwards to them, uncivilized and.... well deplorable. There is no winning that over, no reasoning with that level of contempt; we are at war with the left and they want nothing less than Australian style gun control. http://maia.com.au/prohibited-weapons/ One of those prohibited weapons are tongfa, which are wooden sticks with handles on the side. Guns are a stepping stone to complete control. |
|
Quoted:
It's easy to make allegations if you don't back them up with proof. How about it, brich2929?
Edit: @brich2929 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.
Edit: @brich2929 see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 |
|
Quoted:
It's a MOD- see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.
Edit: @brich2929 see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 
Edit: Responding to your edited post. Your reading comprehension sucks. The only mod who posted on that page is John_Wayne777, and he is saying the opposite of what you think he is saying. In order to say what you THINK he said you would need a comma. Please reread and get back to us. While you are at it, read his SECOND post too, as it is VERY, VERY clear. Then you can apologize for posting an untruth about him--and the staff. |
|
Quoted:
It's a MOD- see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 Quoted:
It's a MOD- see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 I didn't come to my opinion on this lightly.
I don't intend to back off of it for anyone. ANYONE. Pat seems like a good dude. He's also dead fucking wrong. Deal with it. |
|
Quoted:
Not a single member of the staff posted on page one. WTF is wrong with you? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.
Edit: @brich2929 see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted: Quoted: Is this a thread where our feelings are hurt and safe spaces are required because someone has a different opinion than us? It's probably going to be a thread that demonstrates the utter ridiculousness of waiting periods. No matter who is arguing they are a good idea. In CA you have to wait 10 days for EVERY firearm you buy, which negates the whole "cooling off period" bullshit argument. |
|
Quoted:
It's a MOD- see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.
Edit: @brich2929 see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 |
|
Quoted:
did you read his posts? Quoted:
Quoted:
It's a MOD- see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 I didn't come to my opinion on this lightly.
I don't intend to back off of it for anyone. ANYONE. Pat seems like a good dude. He's also dead fucking wrong. Deal with it. Quoted:
Quoted:
. Quoted:
Quoted:
. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.
Edit: @brich2929 see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted: Quoted: Is this a thread where our feelings are hurt and safe spaces are required because someone has a different opinion than us? It's probably going to be a thread that demonstrates the utter ridiculousness of waiting periods. No matter who is arguing they are a good idea. In CA you have to wait 10 days for EVERY firearm you buy, which negates the whole "cooling off period" bullshit argument. 
|
|
Quoted:
It's a MOD- see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There's at last one Staff here that thinks they're a good idea.
Edit: @brich2929 see this thread (page 10: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2001242_Pat-MacNamara-Supports-Universal-Background-Checks-and-Waiting-Periods-.html page 1 |
|
Quoted:
If I'm misunderstanding, then my bad, but that is not how my "grade school mind" read it. Quoted:
Quoted:
You have misunderstood what J_W was saying. He was saying "no matter who thinks its a good idea, its not" not "its a good idea". Edit: Here's the important thing to remember--we are very protective of our volunteers here on the site. If you are going to make scurrilous accusations you need to have your ducks in a row. You didn't, so I'd suggest an edit of your post making the accusation in order to correct the record and not leave it out there, in case someone doesn't read to the end. 
|