Posted: 2/11/2017 11:21:01 AM EDT
| Why didn't the Democrat/media complex make a bigger deal of Republican's refusal to consider Garland? Sure, it was always there, but it was always a low-level whine, not a full throated tantrum. It's like they really didn't care all that much. |
|
Quoted:
I don't dismiss that theory, but there was a time when they were worried about Rubio winning the nomination and the likelihood he'd beat Hillary. Quoted:
Quoted:
They were SURE that Killary would be elected. I don't dismiss that theory, but there was a time when they were worried about Rubio winning the nomination and the likelihood he'd beat Hillary. Yea, not so much. |
|
Garland was nominated for one purpose only, to make republicans look bad in an election year. Obama and the media knew they'd never let him through hence why they put up a moderate to show how unreasonable republicans are.
They never thought Trump would actually win. |
|
Quoted:
Garland was nominated for one purpose only, to make republicans look bad in an election year. Obama and the media knew they'd never let him through hence why they put up a moderate to show how unreasonable republicans are. They never thought Trump would actually win. But that's my point. They just didn't beat on that issue like I would have expected. |
|
Quoted:
Garland was nominated for one purpose only, to make republicans look bad in an election year. Obama and the media knew they'd never let him through hence why they put up a moderate to show how unreasonable republicans are. They never thought Trump would actually win. Glad the Republicans held their ground |
|
Quoted:
Why didn't the Democrat/media complex make a bigger deal of Republican's refusal to consider Garland? Sure, it was always there, but it was always a low-level whine, not a full throated tantrum. It's like they really didn't care all that much. there was a lot of bitching about it, but there is also a bit of history about SC justice not being approved at the end of one presidents office when a new one was about to be elected, as for the noise maybe they assumed Hillary would get in and then it would happen for sure. |
|
Because they would have done the exact same thing if the shoe was on the other foot and everyone knows it.
Joe Biden in 1992 said that if a Supreme Court position opened up, there shouldn't be a nomination process started until after the presidential election was decided. |
|
Quoted:
They were SURE that Killary would be elected. FPNI Again! Their end-game was sooo close they could taste it. Replace a solid Constitutionalist with another bull dyke, or "wise latina"...then Ginsberg would graciously announce her retirement the day after the inauguration, and the USA would become full-blown communist forever and amen. |
|
Quoted:
I don't dismiss that theory, but there was a time when they were worried about Rubio winning the nomination and the likelihood he'd beat Hillary. Quoted:
Quoted:
They were SURE that Killary would be elected. I don't dismiss that theory, but there was a time when they were worried about Rubio winning the nomination and the likelihood he'd beat Hillary. Garland was a much more moderate candidate. They thought Hillary would win and they'd be able to install a straight up Marxist. Too bad their plan backfired. |
|
Quoted:
But that's my point. They just didn't beat on that issue like I would have expected. Quoted:
Quoted:
Garland was nominated for one purpose only, to make republicans look bad in an election year. Obama and the media knew they'd never let him through hence why they put up a moderate to show how unreasonable republicans are. They never thought Trump would actually win. But that's my point. They just didn't beat on that issue like I would have expected. Because they would have been bummed if he was confirmed and Hillary won. And they were very, very confident that she would win. He is pretty much a centrist conservative that LOATHES guns. Not too much of a leftist ideolog on the social justice, environmental and LGBT stuff. |
|
Quoted:
Why didn't the Democrat/media complex make a bigger deal of Republican's refusal to consider Garland? Sure, it was always there, but it was always a low-level whine, not a full throated tantrum. It's like they really didn't care all that much. The Biden rule: no appointments in a presidents last year once election cycle starts Dems invented it |