[ARCHIVED THREAD] - LOL Gary Johnson (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 9/13/2016 8:08:47 PM EDT
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xlmU9LvtAs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcyLyVq-ef8 
What a SJW moron. |
|
Quoted:
Whats with all the statists around here lately? Or do election years bring them out of the woodwork? http://i.imgur.com/ugla12e.jpg Don't forgot... "Picks pro-AWB candidate" |
|
Quoted:
Don't forgot... "Picks anti-AWB candidate" Quoted:
Quoted:
Whats with all the statists around here lately? Or do election years bring them out of the woodwork? http://i.imgur.com/ugla12e.jpg Don't forgot... "Picks anti-AWB candidate" Better than a pro-AWB candidate 
|
|
Quoted:
Better than a pro-AWB candidate Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Whats with all the statists around here lately? Or do election years bring them out of the woodwork? http://i.imgur.com/ugla12e.jpg Don't forgot... "Picks anti-AWB candidate" Better than a pro-AWB candidate Duh. Corrected. 
|
|
Quoted:
Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? And there you are and there's that word again 
|
|
Quoted:
And there you are and there's that word again Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? And there you are and there's that word again Whats wrong with "statist"? |
|
Quoted:
Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? We're tired of your "Muh Principles require me to ride this chariot over this cliff" routine dude. Libertarianism is wonderful in theory, but to believe it will ever actually work is to have childlike naivete about human nature. |
|
Quoted:
Whats wrong with "statist"? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? And there you are and there's that word again Whats wrong with "statist"? Nothing, other than it's the "Libertian" version of calling someone a racist lol |
|
Quoted:
I don't doubt it, the Libertarian Party was been taken over and ruined by the pot movement. Quoted:
Quoted:
He looks stoned. No, the LP is disorganised because we cant decide on what is the perfect amount of government. Some are just shy of anarchy, others use the NAP to justify things like carbon tax. I think the less government the better, so Im voting for the candidate that is promising least amount. governemnt- Gary Johnson. |
|
Quoted:
No, the LP is disorganised because we cant decide on what is the perfect amount of government. Some are just shy of anarchy, others use the NAP to justify things like carbon tax. I think the less government the better, so Im voting for the candidate that is promising least amount. governemnt- Gary Johnson. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He looks stoned. No, the LP is disorganised because we cant decide on what is the perfect amount of government. Some are just shy of anarchy, others use the NAP to justify things like carbon tax. I think the less government the better, so Im voting for the candidate that is promising least amount. governemnt- Gary Johnson.
Just get it over with and vote for Hitlery then..... GJ for less government
|
|
Quoted:
We're tired of your "Muh Principles require me to ride this chariot over this cliff" routine dude. Libertarianism is wonderful in theory, but to believe it will ever actually work is to have childlike naivete about human nature. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? We're tired of your "Muh Principles require me to ride this chariot over this cliff" routine dude. Libertarianism is wonderful in theory, but to believe it will ever actually work is to have childlike naivete about human nature. I have more faith in humanity than you. However, socialism is the mechanism by which the opening scene of idiocracy can occur, so we are unintentionally using passive eugenics to create a nation of dependent people. Eventually you will be right unless we harness the power of the free market to save western civilization. |
| To be fair, anyone who advocates that the govt forcibly interfere with the voluntary exchanges of goods and services, and voluntary associations between individuals, is a statist. There are many here and as far as I'm aware, every presidential candidate is one, too. It's just a matter of degree. |
|
Quoted:
I have more faith in humanity than you. However, socialism is the mechanism by which the opening scene of idiocracy can occur, so we are unintentionally using passive eugenics to create a nation of dependent people. Eventually you will be right unless we harness the power of the free market to save western civilization. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? We're tired of your "Muh Principles require me to ride this chariot over this cliff" routine dude. Libertarianism is wonderful in theory, but to believe it will ever actually work is to have childlike naivete about human nature. I have more faith in humanity than you. However, socialism is the mechanism by which the opening scene of idiocracy can occur, so we are unintentionally using passive eugenics to create a nation of dependent people. Eventually you will be right unless we harness the power of the free market to save western civilization. If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. |
|
Quoted:
If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? We're tired of your "Muh Principles require me to ride this chariot over this cliff" routine dude. Libertarianism is wonderful in theory, but to believe it will ever actually work is to have childlike naivete about human nature. I have more faith in humanity than you. However, socialism is the mechanism by which the opening scene of idiocracy can occur, so we are unintentionally using passive eugenics to create a nation of dependent people. Eventually you will be right unless we harness the power of the free market to save western civilization. If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. Human history is filled with state sponsored terror and religious extremism. Show people the value of the individual and the influence of the ego will fade. |
|
Quoted:
Human history is filled with state sponsored terror and religious extremism. Show people the value of the individual and the influence of the ego will fade. Quoted:
Quoted:
If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. Human history is filled with state sponsored terror and religious extremism. Show people the value of the individual and the influence of the ego will fade. Those are just vehicles, so you basically just reinforced his point. Libertarianism is just another Utopian ideology with little relevance outside a college classroom discussion, the great irony being that it's continued existence if so, would have to be enforced and ensured by an authoritarian government/system. Otherwise, a libertarian society would not survive but a few election cycles....human nature and all. |
|
Quoted:
Those are just vehicles, so you basically just reinforced his point. Libertarianism is just another Utopian ideology with little relevance outside a college classroom discussion, the great irony being that it's continued existence if so, would have to be enforced and ensured by an authoritarian government/system. Otherwise, a libertarian society would not survive but a few election cycles....human nature and all. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. Human history is filled with state sponsored terror and religious extremism. Show people the value of the individual and the influence of the ego will fade. Those are just vehicles, so you basically just reinforced his point. Libertarianism is just another Utopian ideology with little relevance outside a college classroom discussion, the great irony being that it's continued existence if so, would have to be enforced and ensured by an authoritarian government/system. Otherwise, a libertarian society would not survive but a few election cycles....human nature and all. Those are vehicles that the statist uses to manipulate people. Without them we are just brothers and sisters. Sure, the world will always have a few evil individuals, but Libertarianism denies them a monopoly on violence. |
|
Quoted:
Those are vehicles that the statist uses to manipulate people.Without them we are just brothers and sisters. Sure, the world will always have a few evil individuals, but Libertarianism denies them a monopoly on violence. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. Human history is filled with state sponsored terror and religious extremism. Show people the value of the individual and the influence of the ego will fade. Those are just vehicles, so you basically just reinforced his point. Libertarianism is just another Utopian ideology with little relevance outside a college classroom discussion, the great irony being that it's continued existence if so, would have to be enforced and ensured by an authoritarian government/system. Otherwise, a libertarian society would not survive but a few election cycles....human nature and all. Those are vehicles that the statist uses to manipulate people.Without them we are just brothers and sisters. Sure, the world will always have a few evil individuals, but Libertarianism denies them a monopoly on violence. I think you mean the vehicles that people use to manipulate people. Like I said, naively Utopian. It is a nice thought, but that is all it is. |
|
Damn dude, do you ever think or post about anything else. You're life must fucking suck.
|
|
Quoted:
Those are vehicles that the statist uses to manipulate people. Without them we are just brothers and sisters. Sure, the world will always have a few evil individuals, but Libertarianism denies them a monopoly on violence. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you still have faith in humanity, you need some life experience or...even something as simple as picking up a history book. Humanity is a big ball of failure wrapped in bloodshead, rape, theft, violence, slavery, and death. That is the natural order of man. Peace, kindness, prosperity...those are the exceptions...not the rule. Johnson stands for the former, not the latter. His followers are too ignorant of history to see it. Human history is filled with state sponsored terror and religious extremism. Show people the value of the individual and the influence of the ego will fade. Those are just vehicles, so you basically just reinforced his point. Libertarianism is just another Utopian ideology with little relevance outside a college classroom discussion, the great irony being that it's continued existence if so, would have to be enforced and ensured by an authoritarian government/system. Otherwise, a libertarian society would not survive but a few election cycles....human nature and all. Those are vehicles that the statist uses to manipulate people. Without them we are just brothers and sisters. Sure, the world will always have a few evil individuals, but Libertarianism denies them a monopoly on violence. Again...totally naive. Bob and his brothers are going to kill and rape your sisters. They will enslave, ect and there isn't shit you and your Glock will be able to do to stop it...as that's how tribes form and work. Eventually, an Army forms...and someone has to be in charge of it...wonder how that goes...then Police are needed to keep order...then there are people in positions of authority... Humans are naturally violent animals. Groups of humans are naturally violent packs. Go study the American indians for plenty of examples...they were not the "noble savages" that Disney likes to sell in cartoons. See how that works? You are proving my point for me. |
|
LOL at the Liberal running as a Liberaltarian whose VP is a gungrabber |
|
The LP had a gigantic opportunity to make real inroads into the national political scene with this election. Nobody likes Hillary, and damn near nobody thinks much of Trump either. Everyone is just voting against the other side, even more so than usual.
But they pissed it away. Big time. Fuck, the GOP looks like a cadre of political geniuses next to the capital "L" gang these days. Like I said before, they could have picked some random person, John B. Noneoftheabovington, got him on the ballot and ran absolutely no campaign at all, and probably got more votes than Johnson will get. |
|
I like that cunt's "you or I would have done the same thing" argument.
Who cares? You could use the same argument to let in a few million from Africa, the middle east, South America, etc... There are two, and only two, points of consideration with respect to immigration. a) What helps US citizens (open borders do not) b) What is possible (deporting 11 million people isn't) So you seal up the borders and make it increasingly uncomfortable to be here illegally while ejecting the criminals and welfare system mooches. There is no other valid perspective. |
| Although I have few disagreements over Johnson's policies, he is my lesser of three evils and closer in touch with my view by far than the other two, ie non interventionist foreign policy, eliminate federal bureaucracies like the NSA and the FED, pro-liberty on would be states rights issues, consumption tax, etc. As for his experience in NM as Governor, I believe that he will become more liberty minded on the [Libertarian Party Platform] non aggression principle, due to his inclinations toward a voluntary society in his two terms of office. This former GOP checked out with Ron and Rand peace |
|
Quoted:
That is all the modern "libertarian" party cares about. It isn't about freedom. It is about them smoking weed. That's the entire platform for them at this point. Drugs are good...then...nothing. Quoted:
Quoted:
He looks high as fuck. That is all the modern "libertarian" party cares about. It isn't about freedom. It is about them smoking weed. That's the entire platform for them at this point. Drugs are good...then...nothing. You're leaving out 99% of his platform. Libertarians want *YOU* to pay for their weed and other necessities of life... |
|
Quoted:
Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? Quoted:
Quoted:
Statist in libertarian clothes. Will not vote for him. Less statist than the last 3 Republican presidential candidates. Why is it okay to vote for them and not Gary? At this point, because the Ds are out of control and there is a non-establishment candidate running on the R ticket. |
|
Quoted:
You're leaving out 99% of his platform. Libertarians want *YOU* to pay for their weed and other necessities of life... Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
He looks high as fuck. That is all the modern "libertarian" party cares about. It isn't about freedom. It is about them smoking weed. That's the entire platform for them at this point. Drugs are good...then...nothing. You're leaving out 99% of his platform. Libertarians want *YOU* to pay for their weed and other necessities of life... I would disagree wholeheartedly -- I don't want anyone to pay for anyone else's needs or wants, ie not abortions, medicine, pot, cars, diapers, etc. I believe without a shimmer of doubt that the current "drug war" is unjust -- let people be responsible for their voluntary market actions and have access to the market instead of empowering gangs and cartels. |