[ARCHIVED THREAD] - WI Primary election (Page 1 of 6)
Posted: 4/5/2016 11:50:56 AM EDT
|
Conservatism is going to win in WI! FDT! FBS! FHRC! |
|
Quoted:
Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! Quoted:
Quoted:
Conservatism is going to win in WI! Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! You're sad dude. I really can't see how anyone can see you as anything other than a joke right now. |
|
Quoted:
My ballet had more names. 
A couple of my votes were the same as yours. 
Good day, sir. Thanks for voting in this somewhat great state of WI. 
ETA. - Same county, you savage. My village still gave me more names to choose from. See you at RCLRC? 
You know, I live a mile down the road, but only get to go shoot every 6 weeks or so. 
I'm the guy doing drills from concealment 87% of the time. |
|
Quoted:
I never watch TV, but I can imagine that some of the political ads are retarded. Quoted:
Quoted:
Can't wait until tomorrow when we can finally get back to beer commercials! I never watch TV, but I can imagine that some of the political ads are retarded. Yes, they are! |
|
Quoted:
Shit, back in 2011 while at a Milwaukee voting location at a school, they had a huge Obama mural, no covered up, right behind the voting tables. Just an example (from PA) of what I'm talking about: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/06/article-2228858-15E2600A000005DC-675_634x355.jpg Quoted:
Quoted:
They let you have cameras? Shit, back in 2011 while at a Milwaukee voting location at a school, they had a huge Obama mural, no covered up, right behind the voting tables. Just an example (from PA) of what I'm talking about: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/06/article-2228858-15E2600A000005DC-675_634x355.jpg Laws only apply to those who follow them.  WTF!
|
|
Quoted: You know, I live a mile down the road, but only get to go shoot every 6 weeks or so. I'm the guy doing drills from concealment 87% of the time. Quoted: Quoted: My ballot had more names. A couple of my votes were the same as yours. Good day, sir. Thanks for voting in this somewhat great state of WI. ETA. - Same county, you savage. My village still gave me more names to choose from. See you at RCLRC? You know, I live a mile down the road, but only get to go shoot every 6 weeks or so. I'm the guy doing drills from concealment 87% of the time. I would live there if I was only a mile away. ETA. - I would also be heavily in debt due to ammo expenses. |
|
Quoted: You're sad dude. I really can't see how anyone can see you as anything other than a joke right now. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Conservatism is going to win in WI! Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! You're sad dude. I really can't see how anyone can see you as anything other than a joke right now. You are the one cheering for the candidate that wants it. I just pointed out the facts. |
|
Quoted:
You are the one cheering for the candidate that wants it. I just pointed out the facts. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Conservatism is going to win in WI! Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! You're sad dude. I really can't see how anyone can see you as anything other than a joke right now. You are the one cheering for the candidate that wants it. I just pointed out the facts. Trump supporters are too strong on facts. So, you're still a joke Go shit in another thread, liberal. |
|
Quoted:
You are the one cheering for the candidate that wants it. I just pointed out the facts. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Conservatism is going to win in WI! Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! You're sad dude. I really can't see how anyone can see you as anything other than a joke right now. You are the one cheering for the candidate that wants it. I just pointed out the facts. Opining that they should is not the same as forcing them. He also says let the states decide. |
|
Quoted:
I like it how they don't list party affiliation for judges.... We are not in the early 1900's... Everyone is partisan. Everyone. Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise.
|
|
Quoted: Can't wait until tomorrow when we can finally get back to beer commercials! |
|
Quoted:
Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. Quoted:
Quoted:
I like it how they don't list party affiliation for judges.... We are not in the early 1900's... Everyone is partisan. Everyone. Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. Have you thought about how this might work? What would the logistics be to implement some kind of qualification ? |
|
Quoted:
A vote for Cruz = a vote for Ryan/Kasich Good job You must love yourself some amnesty, refugees, and big government spending I would gladly pull the lever for either of those two, over Trump. He's doing good.
And besides, this line of reasoning is juvenile. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. That's why they look at it and go "Hey, this guy voted for Cruz. Let's increment Ted's vote count by one". |
|
Quoted:
Have you thought about how this might work? What would the logistics be to implement some kind of qualification ? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I like it how they don't list party affiliation for judges.... We are not in the early 1900's... Everyone is partisan. Everyone. Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. Have you thought about how this might work? What would the logistics be to implement some kind of qualification ? Oh, don't get me wrong. It's politically impossible. And any politician that seriously suggests it will sign his own political death warrant.
I'm taking a page from the Trump playbook and suggesting things I'd like to see, but know damn good and well will never see the light of day. 
|
|
Quoted: I would gladly pull the lever for either of those two, over Trump. He's doing good. And besides, this line of reasoning is juvenile. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. That's why they look at it and go "Hey, this guy voted for Cruz. Let's increment Ted's vote count by one". Quoted: Quoted: A vote for Cruz = a vote for Ryan/Kasich Good job You must love yourself some amnesty, refugees, and big government spending I would gladly pull the lever for either of those two, over Trump. He's doing good. And besides, this line of reasoning is juvenile. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. That's why they look at it and go "Hey, this guy voted for Cruz. Let's increment Ted's vote count by one". Yup. If your candidate doesn't get to the magic number, well, that's how the game is played. I'm doing my part to get my guy to the magic number. If gym's guy moves on to the next "stage" for November, then we get to play this over again. And for fucks sake, gym, lay off Ryan. He's light years better than Hillary or Bernie. Take it from some WI folks who have known him for a long time. |
|
Quoted:
Yup. If your candidate doesn't get to the magic number, well, that's how the game is played. I'm doing my part to get my guy to the magic number. If gym's guy moves on to the next "stage" for November, then we get to play this over again. And for fucks sake, gym, lay off Ryan. He's light years better than Hillary or Bernie. Take it from some WI folks who have known him for a long time. I don't care how great he is. If he wants amnesty then this country is done for. It will move even more dramatically to the left with 40 to 50 million new permanent Democrat voters who know nothing other than socialism. |
|
Quoted:
I would gladly pull the lever for either of those two, over Trump. He's doing good.
And besides, this line of reasoning is juvenile. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. That's why they look at it and go "Hey, this guy voted for Cruz. Let's increment Ted's vote count by one". Quoted:
Quoted:
A vote for Cruz = a vote for Ryan/Kasich Good job You must love yourself some amnesty, refugees, and big government spending I would gladly pull the lever for either of those two, over Trump. He's doing good.
And besides, this line of reasoning is juvenile. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Cruz. That's why they look at it and go "Hey, this guy voted for Cruz. Let's increment Ted's vote count by one". This. The Trump supporters are just lashing out because WI has them collectively shitting their pants. |
|
Quoted:
Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. Quoted:
Quoted:
I like it how they don't list party affiliation for judges.... We are not in the early 1900's... Everyone is partisan. Everyone. Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. Heck, I came to that conclusion by the time I was 17. As time passes that position only gets reinforced by studies and observation. |
|
Quoted: Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. Quoted: Quoted: I like it how they don't list party affiliation for judges.... We are not in the early 1900's... Everyone is partisan. Everyone. Good. It should be your job as a voter to research it first. It's bad enough that judges are up for a vote as it is (I wish they weren't), but at least they had the sense to not list any party affiliation. I remain convinced that most people shouldn't vote, and I'm becoming increasingly in favor of restricting the shit out of the franchise. It's hard to find much on judges around here. Have tried in the past. So I just vote no on all of them. |
|
Quoted:
Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! Quoted:
Quoted:
Conservatism is going to win in WI! Yay for forcing raped women to carry the rapists baby!!!! Well, all six of them a year can have a little pity party. Fuck it, I'll even buy the cake. I'll even offer to personally execute each of the rapists if they need (following due process and a fair trial by a jury of their peers, etc.). Meanwhile, in the real world, I'd like for my government to maybe stop helping kill 800,000 babies every year. Just saying. |
|
Quoted:
LMAO Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I was voter number 136 in a village near Appleton. Pretty busy day for a primary. 430 in Caledonia. 10:30am Liberal stronghold! Caledonia?  LMAO I'm bad... lol I live in the People's Republic of Dane County It's very nice except for the crazies. |
|
What kind of "Big Lie" circus will Trump trot out tomorrow in order to distract attention from his loss.
This has basically been his entire campaign strategy since Iowa: conjur up another "Big Lie" about Cruz, whine about how unfairly he is being treated, and hint at a 3rd party run. Time to dump Lyin' Trump. |