Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/16/2003 10:12:08 PM EDT
 Guys I got it.  Listen Klinton dropped what 460 bombs on Iraq in 1998 and that wasn't considered a war right.  I mean there was no protests, no peace niks, now marches, not even no human sheilds or chicky dixes...
 So instead of going to war, why don't we just lob another say 450 dam well place bombs again.  If we can get Saddam to moveing arround we might get him or maybe one of his own people will take his ass out!!!  
 And we ain't went to war, right??
 I mean the way I look at it, we got 460 free shots before we have to go to war..  That's the rules the Demacraps and the peace niks have they themselves set, right??

 And if we don't get him then we can always go to war..
 
3/16/2003 10:25:15 PM EDT
[#1]
Cause the protesters are already organized, and 450 bombs now will look like the start of the war, Saddam will torch the oilfields, and we will have to go in anyway.
3/16/2003 10:52:31 PM EDT
[#2]
You missed an important point... which can be found in Article 34 Section 14 Paragraph 3 of the manual for American defense policy:

"You may lob up to 460 bombs without it being war if you are a Democrat.  If you are a Republican, it takes only 5."
3/16/2003 11:05:38 PM EDT
[#3]
damn Klinton...gets away with EVERYTHING
3/16/2003 11:07:51 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
You missed an important point... which can be found in Article 34 Section 14 Paragraph 3 of the manual for American defense policy:

"You may lob up to 460 bombs without it being war if you are a Democrat.  If you are a Republican, it takes only 5."
View Quote


Strange how that works.