Posted: 5/29/2015 8:22:08 PM EDT
Neat stuff
|
|
Quoted:
OK, so I have a dumb question. If you take a full size engine, say a J33, which is already small, and reduce it to CAD files, couldn't you then tell the computer to produce a miniature version of the larger engine that was identical in every way? I don't think fluid dynamics scale properly for that. It would be cool as hell if it did, though. |
|
Quoted:
I don't think fluid dynamics scale properly for that. It would be cool as hell if it did, though. Quoted:
Quoted:
OK, so I have a dumb question. If you take a full size engine, say a J33, which is already small, and reduce it to CAD files, couldn't you then tell the computer to produce a miniature version of the larger engine that was identical in every way? I don't think fluid dynamics scale properly for that. It would be cool as hell if it did, though. Neither will bearing loads. Many clearance gaps and such may actually be the same as in no scaling at all. |
|
Quoted: Neither will bearing loads. Many clearance gaps and such may actually be the same as in no scaling at all. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: OK, so I have a dumb question. If you take a full size engine, say a J33, which is already small, and reduce it to CAD files, couldn't you then tell the computer to produce a miniature version of the larger engine that was identical in every way? I don't think fluid dynamics scale properly for that. It would be cool as hell if it did, though. Neither will bearing loads. Many clearance gaps and such may actually be the same as in no scaling at all. |