|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Have you seen the porno version? Its called "The Cumstain Bears." 
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Brony+dream+toy+a+friend+posted+a+link+to+this_c54a86_3872585.jpg Current Bid: £200.50 Definitive proof that the we are living in the end times 
|
|
Quoted:
Everyone i have asked at work remembers it as "Stein" as well. Quoted:
Quoted:
Wait, what? It wasn't stein? The fuck is going on here?  Everyone i have asked at work remembers it as "Stein" as well. Yeah, I called my mom and asked her. I just said "Hey, you remember those books about that bear family from when I was a kid?" She says, "Yeah, the BerenstEEN bears." I said, how would you spell that. She said with Ein. I said would you believe it's stAin? She said no way and googled it. Now her mind is boggled too. She's running around her office asking everyone. 
|
|
Quoted:
Yeah, I called my mom and asked her. I just said "Hey, you remember those books about that bear family from when I was a kid?" She says, "Yeah, the BerenstEEN bears." I said, how would you spell that. She said with Ein. I said would you believe it's stAin? She said no way and googled it. Now her mind is boggled too. She's running around her office asking everyone. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wait, what? It wasn't stein? The fuck is going on here? Everyone i have asked at work remembers it as "Stein" as well. Yeah, I called my mom and asked her. I just said "Hey, you remember those books about that bear family from when I was a kid?" She says, "Yeah, the BerenstEEN bears." I said, how would you spell that. She said with Ein. I said would you believe it's stAin? She said no way and googled it. Now her mind is boggled too. She's running around her office asking everyone. I have asked 5 people here some with kids some without kids all the same response STEEEEN!!!!!!! |
|
Quoted:
Do tell... Quoted:
Quoted:
Hugh Everett had the answer to this back in 1957 but Neils Bohr basically told him he was retarded and then nobody took him serious. Turns out he was on the right path. Do tell... GD isn't really the place for MWI or quantum mechanics. A Google or Wikipedia search would probably be better. |
|
Quoted:
Do tell... Quoted:
Quoted:
Hugh Everett had the answer to this back in 1957 but Neils Bohr basically told him he was retarded and then nobody took him serious. Turns out he was on the right path. Do tell... What is more logical? That a wave function requires a conscious observer to collapse into a particle or that every possible configuration is realized in an infinite number of universes? |
|
EVEN IF we totally throw sanity to the wind and believe any and all of this, it doesn't support a quantum-universe reality. That would suggest that every possible event that could ever have occurred has occurred in some parallel universe. Surely, if there were such a thing as worldlines slipping or whatever, it would apply to more than just a stupid children's book series. There would be, purely by statistical chance, billions of people all recalling different events from different worldlines.
If it were to support anything supernatural, I tend to think it would be supporting the idea that we're all within a simulation. Perhaps a bored programmer decided to change everything but our minds (either because he could not or would not). That makes more sense than the idea that so many people "slipped" from another worldline that differs *only* in the sense that a children's book series author's surname is spelled differently. Or, you know, people aren't remembering correctly. |
|
Quoted:
EVEN IF we totally throw sanity to the wind and believe any and all of this, it doesn't support a quantum-universe reality. That would suggest that every possible event that could ever have occurred has occurred in some parallel universe. Surely, if there were such a thing as worldlines slipping or whatever, it would apply to more than just a stupid children's book series. There would be, purely by statistical chance, billions of people all recalling different events from different worldlines. If it were to support anything supernatural, I tend to think it would be supporting the idea that we're all within a simulation. Perhaps a bored programmer decided to change everything but our minds (either because he could not or would not). That makes more sense than the idea that so many people "slipped" from another worldline that differs *only* in the sense that a children's book series author's surname is spelled differently. Or, you know, people aren't remembering correctly. A glitch in the matrix. |
|
Quoted: Part of this picture is photoshopped. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/34/b6/75/34b675ea353a3ef710f1ff92d757eb97.jpg Are you sure? I'm 98% positive I had that one |
|
Quoted:
EVEN IF we totally throw sanity to the wind and believe any and all of this, it doesn't support a quantum-universe reality. That would suggest that every possible event that could ever have occurred has occurred in some parallel universe. Surely, if there were such a thing as worldlines slipping or whatever, it would apply to more than just a stupid children's book series. There would be, purely by statistical chance, billions of people all recalling different events from different worldlines. If it were to support anything supernatural, I tend to think it would be supporting the idea that we're all within a simulation. Perhaps a bored programmer decided to change everything but our minds (either because he could not or would not). That makes more sense than the idea that so many people "slipped" from another worldline that differs *only* in the sense that a children's book series author's surname is spelled differently. Or, you know, people aren't remembering correctly. It's weird though, that it's a collective incorrect memory. I've asked close to 20 people today. And asked all the same way "Do you remember that book from when we were kids that was about the bear family?" I want them to remember on their own without implanting my pronunciation and spelling. Every single one remembers it as Berenstein. I don't think this is some sign of a parallel universe, but it is pretty weird. |