|
Quoted:
If it's a negligent discharge, it's not the gun that needs fixing. Quoted:
Sure-Draw's momentary safety device for Glocks provides the solution to a long-known problem - reducing the chance of negligent discharge. If it's a negligent discharge, it's not the gun that needs fixing. Yep. I carry my G27 AIWB, and have no worry about shooting my dick off. Holster covers the trigger, and when drawing, by the time my booger hooker is on the bang switch, it's well clear of shooting any part of my anatomy. |
|
Quoted: Some people’s attitudes towards gun safeties depends on who taught them to shoot, especially if no one taught them at all and did what the internet told them to buy or do. Quoted: Quoted: That's a special kind of stupid. I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) |
|
Quoted:
I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a special kind of stupid. I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) |
|
Quoted: Right, so I guess all those 1911 or M9 issued servicemen were all mouth breathers too? Or were you just saying that particular device is no bueno? Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That's a special kind of stupid. I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) Like I said, I wouldn't even call it a safety. 1911's have a real safety. My ccw is a compact 1911, this device would be akin to me spring loading the manual safety on it so that without me actively pressing it it would not be locked. If someone has the mindset that they need this to be safe, then they shouldn't be carrying a gun with no manual safety in the first place. Again, I don't even consider this a safety. |
|
Quoted:
Right, so I guess all those 1911 or M9 issued servicemen were all mouth breathers too? Or were you just saying that particular device is no bueno? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a special kind of stupid. I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) Classic GSL 
You should never depend or rely on a mechanical safety. Never ever ever. And if the servicemen who are issued M9's or 1911's do that, they are negligent. |
|
Quoted:
Like I said, I wouldn't even call it a safety. 1911's have a real safety. My ccw is a compact 1911, this device would be akin to me spring loading the manual safety on it so that without me actively pressing it it would not be locked. If someone has the mindset that they need this to be safe, then they shouldn't be carrying a gun with no manual safety in the first place. Again, I don't even consider this a safety. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a special kind of stupid. I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) Like I said, I wouldn't even call it a safety. 1911's have a real safety. My ccw is a compact 1911, this device would be akin to me spring loading the manual safety on it so that without me actively pressing it it would not be locked. If someone has the mindset that they need this to be safe, then they shouldn't be carrying a gun with no manual safety in the first place. Again, I don't even consider this a safety. |
|
Quoted:
Classic GSL
You should never depend or rely on a mechanical safety. Never ever ever. And if the servicemen who are issued M9's or 1911's do that, they are negligent. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
That's a special kind of stupid. I wouldn't even call it a safety if you have to actively be pressing it for it to work. Training yourself to use that novelty will take more time and energy than just learning the right way to holster and un-holster the gun (you know, like normal people who predominately breathe out of their noses.) Classic GSL
You should never depend or rely on a mechanical safety. Never ever ever. And if the servicemen who are issued M9's or 1911's do that, they are negligent. |
keep em flying
|
I carry a XD9sc. I have a habit of holstering the gun with my thumb on the back of the slide. This ensures that the grip safety is NOT activated while holstering, just on the off chance that something snags the trigger as the gun is being holstered. Glocks don't have grip safeties. That said, if someone wants a gun that is safer to carry, instead of modifying their glock with this stupid contraption, they should throw away the glock and get an XD.
|
|
Quoted:
Just came to post this. Bet it can be modded. Quoted:
Quoted:
All I will say that if you were to look up the plans for a Glock Full-Auto sear, you might notice a 'striking' similarity.... Just came to post this. Bet it can be modded. I have a suspicion that that might be the whole reason they're making and selling it. |