|
Quoted:
Hippies are masturbating to that video.
OTOH, lot's of those old dams serve no purpose. Quoted:
Hippies are masturbating to that video.
OTOH, lot's of those old dams serve no purpose. Annual operating costs $400,000 Annual power benefits $2,896,000 Annual value of power at consumer rates $4.8 million ($0.06/kWh) Was operational to 2008, shut down for environmental reasons. Wiki - Largest Dam Demolished in US Was a registered Historic Place and Landmark. he sediment plume was expected to kill some aquatic life below the dam and displace fish as far downstream as Bonneville dam. It could also harm several generations of an endangered chum population.[14] Most environmental groups involved with the decommissioning plan, as well as the national forest service, believe that the long term benefits of removing the dam far outweigh the short term damage done by flushed sedimentation.[6] And some fish and environmental advocates see this case as an important precedent for dam removals to restore free flowing rivers Hydroelectric is the most economical and "free" power source there is. WTF. All this because they didn't want to install $50 million in Fish Ladders. |
|
Quoted:
Annual operating costs $400,000 Annual power benefits $2,896,000 Annual value of power at consumer rates $4.8 million ($0.06/kWh) Was operational to 2008, shut down for environmental reasons. Wiki - Largest Dam Demolished in US Was a registered Historic Place and Landmark. Hydroelectric is the most economical and "free" power source there is. WTF. All this because they didn't want to install $50 million in Fish Ladders. Quoted:
Quoted:
Hippies are masturbating to that video.
OTOH, lot's of those old dams serve no purpose. Annual operating costs $400,000 Annual power benefits $2,896,000 Annual value of power at consumer rates $4.8 million ($0.06/kWh) Was operational to 2008, shut down for environmental reasons. Wiki - Largest Dam Demolished in US Was a registered Historic Place and Landmark. he sediment plume was expected to kill some aquatic life below the dam and displace fish as far downstream as Bonneville dam. It could also harm several generations of an endangered chum population.[14] Most environmental groups involved with the decommissioning plan, as well as the national forest service, believe that the long term benefits of removing the dam far outweigh the short term damage done by flushed sedimentation.[6] And some fish and environmental advocates see this case as an important precedent for dam removals to restore free flowing rivers Hydroelectric is the most economical and "free" power source there is. WTF. All this because they didn't want to install $50 million in Fish Ladders. Please tell me you're not that dumb.
There was a lot more sludge behind it than I expected. |
