[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Police brutality backfires (Page 1 of 8)
Posted: 11/13/2013 11:10:06 AM EDT
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ybkV3PjQTY&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Can some one embed the video? I'm on my cellular communication device. |
|
Quoted: I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? |
|
I agree, and it appears it has ramped up nicely already. |
|
Quoted:
"just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force. |
|
Quoted:
"just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? If I had an ignore list, it would be filled quickly with some of the comments in this thread alone. |
|
Quoted: If I had an ignore list, it would be filled quickly with some of the comments in this thread alone. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? If I had an ignore list, it would be filled quickly with some of the comments in this thread alone. Our other one got locked.  |
|
Quoted:
When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force. Ever try to cuff a recalcitrant individual? Ever give him commands to bring his hands back and he refuses? Use of Force is about control, and sometimes it's not pretty. When I carried the PR24, direct strikes like that were taught to gain physical compliance from a resistant individual. |
|
Quoted:
Our other one got locked.
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? If I had an ignore list, it would be filled quickly with some of the comments in this thread alone. Our other one got locked.
What one? |
|
Quoted: Ever try to cuff a recalcitrant individual? Ever give him commands to bring his hands back and he refuses? Use of Force is about control, and sometimes it's not pretty. When I carried the PR24, direct strikes like that were taught to gain physical compliance from a resistant individual. At least thats what goes on the report.  |
|
Feel free to post that in other threads.  |
|
Quoted:
Ever try to cuff a recalcitrant individual? Ever give him commands to bring his hands back and he refuses? Use of Force is about control, and sometimes it's not pretty. When I carried the PR24, direct strikes like that were taught to gain physical compliance from a resistant individual. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force. Ever try to cuff a recalcitrant individual? Ever give him commands to bring his hands back and he refuses? Use of Force is about control, and sometimes it's not pretty. When I carried the PR24, direct strikes like that were taught to gain physical compliance from a resistant individual. What was the ass-whipping from the crowd that didn't like it called?
|
|
Quoted:
What was the ass-whipping from the crowd that didn't like it called? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force. Ever try to cuff a recalcitrant individual? Ever give him commands to bring his hands back and he refuses? Use of Force is about control, and sometimes it's not pretty. When I carried the PR24, direct strikes like that were taught to gain physical compliance from a resistant individual. What was the ass-whipping from the crowd that didn't like it called? Steamroller 
|
|
Quoted: When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force. Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I guess some folks don't like cops who have to beat on someone they have down with a nightstick. I think the police would have been fine if they had just arrested the guy, but they had to put the beat down on him. TXL "just arrested the guy". And if he resists being put into handcuffs? He never did get cuffed. A couple of baton pokes is a "beat down"? When there are 4 officers piled on top of a guy who just ran on the field... just ran on the field, mind you, he didn't knife a pregnant mother, sell heroin to school kids, shoot up a precinct or even lead the cops on a high-speed chase, he just ran on the field. And that officer felt the need to start ramming his PR24 (or whatever they call them these days) into the suspect's back? So yeah, it was a beat down. An unnecessary, unneeded and gratuitous use of force.   |