Posted: 4/9/2013 6:44:03 PM EDT
|
Quoted:
Poor depth of field, boring subject matter, out of focus, not enough light. Try shooting it at ISO 200 and f/2.0 at the highest shutter speed possible. Try like f4, and you could bump that to iso400 without a problem. F2 would not give enough depth to enjoy the image... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Poor depth of field, boring subject matter, out of focus, not enough light. Try shooting it at ISO 200 and f/2.0 at the highest shutter speed possible. Try like f4, and you could bump that to iso400 without a problem. F2 would not give enough depth to enjoy the image... Max that depth of field! |
|
Quoted: I've wanted to try a couple of times but I'm askeered. I've come *really* close a couple of times of saying, "Would you mind if I took your picture? I know some guys on this website who would love it." I just don't think that would go over well. What could possibly go wrong? |
|
Some associates and I had access to a number of 110 cartridge cameras that actually had lenses like a 35mm camera only smaller.
They also had small flash accessories you could use as well. Anyway we took pictures all over town, in and out of establishments, stores, bars everything but a casino. No one noticed. We were amazed that no one paid any attention at all despite the automatic action of the camera. There wasn't a manual setting so the film would auto advance. Of course we had manual Pentax cameras as well as a few Kodaks but we liked the portability of the small 110s. We hardley ever placed the camera at eye level but the pictures still turned out superior to the one above. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Poor depth of field, boring subject matter, out of focus, not enough light. Try shooting it at ISO 200 and f/2.0 at the highest shutter speed possible. Try like f4, and you could bump that to iso400 without a problem. F2 would not give enough depth to enjoy the image... Too much grain. That sort of bumbum demands Portra 160 for rich, smooth colors and superior scanability. |
|
Quoted:
Some associates and I had access to a number of 110 cartridge cameras that actually had lenses like a 35mm camera only smaller. They also had small flash accessories you could use as well. Anyway we took pictures all over town, in and out of establishments, stores, bars everything but a casino. No one noticed. We were amazed that no one paid any attention at all despite the automatic action of the camera. There wasn't a manual setting so the film would auto advance. Of course we had manual Pentax cameras as well as a few Kodaks but we liked the portability of the small 110s. We hardley ever placed the camera at eye level but the pictures still turned out superior to the one above. Minolta 110 SLR they were a handy little camera I had one of those back in the day. It was a kit with two or three lenses and used 110 cartridges. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've wanted to try a couple of times but I'm askeered. I've come *really* close a couple of times of saying, "Would you mind if I took your picture? I know some guys on this website who would love it." I just don't think that would go over well. What could possibly go wrong? Yeah, no offense but I'm not taking advice on acceptable public behavior from you, only. Just the other day I was taking a picture of my daughter's hair while I was grocery shopping and the lady behind the seafood counter gave me a dirty look because I was aiming in her general direction. I live in a small town and I really can't afford to be banned from HEB. |
|
"You even look like a dumb fuck"
|
|
I guess people ought to get used to it with Google glass becoming available. |
|
Quoted: Not usually the best thing to do... Unless your in a Walmart ![]() Go here now. Trust me. http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/photos/ |





