Posted: 1/15/2013 12:58:29 PM EDT
| Is it possible they will classify these as destructive devices in order to ban by EO? |
|
Quoted: Is it possible they will classify these as destructive devices in order to ban by EO? One of the idiot Marxist-democrats somewhere has already called a high capacity mag a "weapon of mass destruction". Would not put it past the king-messiah and his minions to attempt such a move. That would mean my Ruger BX-25s will be evil. |
|
Quoted:
I'll take your banabanana banbanbanaan banbana banana babnana and raise you Bananarama http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/37222/Bananarama.jpg Man I heard thos Bananarama assault clips have been banned since the 20's. Must be some bad ass stuff. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll take your banabanana banbanbanaan banbana banana babnana and raise you Bananarama http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/37222/Bananarama.jpg Man I heard thos Bananarama assault clips have been banned since the 20's. Must be some bad ass stuff. I had several accidental discharges
|
|
Quoted:
Is it possible they will classify these as destructive devices in order to ban by EO? Why not educate yourself? You can find the definition of "destructive device" in 18 USC 921. It's readily available on the information superhighway. Read it and ask yourself: Does a magazine fit within this definition? |
|
Quoted: And definitions can never be changed right?Quoted: Is it possible they will classify these as destructive devices in order to ban by EO? Why not educate yourself? You can find the definition of "destructive device" in 18 USC 921. It's readily available on the information superhighway. Read it and ask yourself: Does a magazine fit within this definition? |







