Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/31/2012 2:01:23 PM EDT
Dear Obo2,



Thank you for contacting me to share your comments regarding gun control measures in response to the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns on this important issue.



The horrific shooting that took place in Newtown that stole twenty-seven innocent lives – twenty of those children – is an incomprehensible tragedy that has deeply saddened us all. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families during this difficult time.



Like you, I know that a serious discussion on what is necessary to prevent these massacres and other senseless acts of violence is long overdue. As Americans, I know that we are capable of such a discussion without politicizing this unthinkable tragedy.



As you may know, the Second Amendment allows responsible, law-abiding U.S. citizens to own firearms, though this valuable protection is not without certain commonsense limitations. For example, federal background checks limit who may purchase firearms, and there are restrictions on the sale of automatic weapons to civilians. Government agencies, police departments, mental health institutions, psychiatrists, and family members may also request that an individual be placed on the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Index as an additional layer of security.



Our country has important laws and systems in place to protect the public, and despite this tragedy, they have been largely effective. Millions of law-abiding gun owners should not be punished as a result of the actions of one disturbed individual, but we must make serious efforts to stop these horrible acts. A comprehensive response means preventing firearms from falling into the hands of those who would do us harm, careful examination of the root causes of these violent acts, and a serious evaluation of how we treat mental health in our country. Above all, it requires thoughtful, reasonable, and thorough discussions – and actions – to prevent these senseless tragedies from devastating our communities and our families ever again. The loss of more innocent lives is unacceptable.



Again, I appreciate your thoughts and it is an honor to serve you in Congress. Your suggestions are always welcome, and if ever I may be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.











          Sincerely,

         DR. JOE HECK
         Member of Congress
12/31/2012 2:04:24 PM EDT
[#1]
Is he a dem?
12/31/2012 2:04:27 PM EDT
[#2]
Above all, it requires thoughtful, reasonable, and thorough discussions...

Never going to happen with these clowns.
12/31/2012 2:04:51 PM EDT
[#3]
Well that's the first one I've read that doesn't sound like it came from the Brady Campaign!

I still haven't heard back from mine but they are very liberal so I'm not holding my breath.
12/31/2012 2:05:00 PM EDT
[#4]
danced around that pretty well..... seems like a person who can be easily swayed either way.
12/31/2012 2:05:42 PM EDT
[#5]
Also see here...

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1412829_Response_from_Congressman_Joe_Heck__Nevada.html

Form letter!
12/31/2012 2:05:54 PM EDT
[#6]
Sounds like the usual Congressional boiler plate answer of a non-supporter of the 2nd amendment.  Hope I'm wrong.
12/31/2012 2:06:07 PM EDT
[#7]
For example, federal background checks limit who may purchase firearms, and there are restrictions on the sale of automatic weapons to civilians. Government agencies, police departments, mental health institutions, psychiatrists, and family members may also request that an individual be placed on the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Index as an additional layer of security.



Part in red, is that true?

12/31/2012 2:06:45 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Dear Obo2,



Thank you for contacting me to share your comments regarding gun control measures in response to the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your concerns on this important issue.



The horrific shooting that took place in Newtown that stole twenty-seven innocent lives – twenty of those children – is an incomprehensible tragedy that has deeply saddened us all. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families during this difficult time.



Like you, I know that a serious discussion on what is necessary to prevent these massacres and other senseless acts of violence is long overdue. As Americans, I know that we are capable of such a discussion without politicizing this unthinkable tragedy.



As you may know, the Second Amendment allows responsible, law-abiding U.S. citizens to own firearms, though this valuable protection is not without certain commonsense limitations. For example, federal background checks limit who may purchase firearms, and there are restrictions on the sale of automatic weapons to civilians. Government agencies, police departments, mental health institutions, psychiatrists, and family members may also request that an individual be placed on the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Index as an additional layer of security.



Our country has important laws and systems in place to protect the public, and despite this tragedy, they have been largely effective. Millions of law-abiding gun owners should not be punished as a result of the actions of one disturbed individual, but we must make serious efforts to stop these horrible acts. A comprehensive response means preventing firearms from falling into the hands of those who would do us harm, careful examination of the root causes of these violent acts, and a serious evaluation of how we treat mental health in our country. Above all, it requires thoughtful, reasonable, and thorough discussions – and actions – to prevent these senseless tragedies from devastating our communities and our families ever again. The loss of more innocent lives is unacceptable.



Again, I appreciate your thoughts and it is an honor to serve you in Congress. Your suggestions are always welcome, and if ever I may be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.











          Sincerely,

         DR. JOE HECK
         Member of Congress


Don't know what he is like, but that sounds kind of wishy-washy to me.  What does "preventing firearms from falling into the hands of those who would do us harm" mean?
12/31/2012 2:06:49 PM EDT
[#9]
Sounds like the status quo.
12/31/2012 2:07:28 PM EDT
[#10]
That reads like a 90% chance of a no vote on any sort of ban. He's keying in on the mental health aspect of this and enforcing existing laws. That is where the discussion needs to go.
12/31/2012 2:07:33 PM EDT
[#11]
While it sounds like he is supporting the status quo, he needs to read 2A...

As you may know, the Second Amendment allows responsible, law-abiding U.S. citizens to own firearms, though this valuable protection is not without certain commonsense limitations. For example, federal background checks limit who may purchase firearms, and there are restrictions on the sale of automatic weapons to civilians. Government agencies, police departments, mental health institutions, psychiatrists, and family members may also request that an individual be placed on the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Index as an additional layer of security.


2A doesn't cover any of that.

...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
12/31/2012 2:08:37 PM EDT
[#12]
From the other thread...

I know Dr Heck personally, having worked with him in the ER and that letter doesn't really sound like him. It sounds way too PC, he is a very conservative guy in the conversations I've had with him. I think he will be on our side when it comes down to brass tacks, no worries about that.
12/31/2012 2:10:29 PM EDT
[#13]
That is pretty much the biggest non-answer I've ever seen...lol
12/31/2012 2:13:40 PM EDT
[#14]
Yeah sorry nothing unexpected here a non committal form letter.


Here are his gun group ratings

GUN ISSUES
2012Gun Owners of America - Ratings on Gun Rights - Elected to 113th Congress [12/2012]83%
2012National Rifle Association - Candidate Positions on Gun Rights92%
2011Gun Owners of America - Key Votes Alignment on Gun Rights - Federal Vote Scorecard - 112th Congress, First Session75%
2010Gun Owners of America - Congressional Candidate Ratings on Gun Rights [09/2010]A

taken from http://votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/44082/joe-heck-jr#.UOIcJW-5MmQ
12/31/2012 2:19:50 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
danced around that pretty well..... seems like a person who can be easily swayed either way.


He'll ban them in a heartbeat if it looks popular.
12/31/2012 2:20:58 PM EDT
[#16]
Does every member of Congress use this same form-letter? I've read this almost exact same letter posted by members from other states.
12/31/2012 7:15:49 PM EDT
[#17]
He will vote for the winning side, he does not care one way or the other, he will side with the majority of the votes.