Posted: 11/5/2012 9:07:11 AM EDT
| 49-48... ROMNEY |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Source? Link? Polling method? Registered voters or likely voters? More information is needed other to give the numbers any relevance. Ah, I think that since this was a Gallup poll, you could try that Google thing and look up gallup.com. http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx |
|
Quoted: nationwide polls are useless, show me the swing states. OK FL: R 52% O 47%... MI: R 47% O 46%... VA: R 50% O 48%... OH: O 49% R 49%... And that is with D+3 to D+ 8 methodology. PA was tied last I saw as well. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: nationwide polls are useless, show me the swing states. OK FL: R 52% O 47%... MI: R 47% O 46%... VA: R 50% O 48%... OH: O 49% R 49%... And that is with D+3 to D+ 8 methodology. PA was tied last I saw as well. The sample data is so skewed in favor of dem turnout and yet the polls are showing Romney with a lead. I don't know why so many people are completely ignoring this fact. Willful ignorance?
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Source? Link? Polling method? Registered voters or likely voters? More information is needed other to give the numbers any relevance. Ah, I think that since this was a Gallup poll, you could try that Google thing and look up gallup.com. Or people could actually put in the details needed to make their post relevant. Would it really have been that hard to add "Gallup's final pre-election survey of likely voters" and a link to http://www.gallup.com/poll/158519/romney-obama-gallup-final-election-survey.aspx |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: nationwide polls are useless, show me the swing states. OK FL: R 52% O 47%... MI: R 47% O 46%... VA: R 50% O 48%... OH: O 49% R 49%... And that is with D+3 to D+ 8 methodology. PA was tied last I saw as well. The sample data is so skewed in favor of dem turnout and yet the polls are showing Romney with a lead. I don't know why so many people are completely ignoring this fact. Willful ignorance? They're assuming the same thing the pollsters are assuming: That Obama will enjoy a huge turnout tomorrow like he did in 2008. If that happens then it will be a miracle for him. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
nationwide polls are useless, show me the swing states. OK FL: R 52% O 47%... MI: R 47% O 46%... VA: R 50% O 48%... OH: O 49% R 49%... And that is with D+3 to D+ 8 methodology. PA was tied last I saw as well. The sample data is so skewed in favor of dem turnout and yet the polls are showing Romney with a lead. I don't know why so many people are completely ignoring this fact. Willful ignorance? They're assuming the same thing the pollsters are assuming: That Obama will enjoy a huge turnout tomorrow like he did in 2008. If that happens then it will be a miracle for him. Not going to happen - that is why they are screaming about voter suppression already. They are going to claim the lack of enthusiasm reflects the evil GOP denying legitimate votes. |
|
Quoted:
I'm going out to buy a gallon of Jack Daniels just for this event tomorrow. 
I'm torn, though! Do I drink the night away for celebration/depression, or do I stay sober in case Romney wins and SHTF with rioters? Decisions decisions  You've got time. They won't show up in your neighborhood until they are finished burning their own down first. |
|
Quoted:
I'm going out to buy a gallon of Jack Daniels just for this event tomorrow.
I'm torn, though! Do I drink the night away for celebration/depression, or do I stay sober in case Romney wins and SHTF with rioters? Decisions decisions Oh I'll be drinking something. There won't be any riots in my neighborhood. Then again, I won't be surprised if we all go to bed not knowing. Going to bed now, gotta get up early and vote 
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: nationwide polls are useless, show me the swing states. OK FL: R 52% O 47%... MI: R 47% O 46%... VA: R 50% O 48%... OH: O 49% R 49%... And that is with D+3 to D+ 8 methodology. PA was tied last I saw as well. The sample data is so skewed in favor of dem turnout and yet the polls are showing Romney with a lead. I don't know why so many people are completely ignoring this fact. Willful ignorance? No one is ignoring and they aren't skewed, it reflects the people they polled. They didn't say, "lets keep calling people till we get more democrats." One thing you should understand is that there has been a slide of republicans going to independent. This is one of the reasons you see them going heavily Romney and why there are more democrats when polling then republicans.
|
|
Quoted:
One thing you should understand is that there has been a slide of republicans going to independent. Respectfully, Rassmussen announced today that self-identified Republicans are at a record high percentage of the electorate since 2002 (when he started polling partisan trends). http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/partisan_trends |